Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think their no-touching rule for the baby is OTT?

749 replies

Pretfeen · 03/05/2026 16:52

Some relatives recently had a baby. They are quite a young couple in mid 20s and have set a rule that no one is allowed to hold or touch baby until he's at least 12 weeks old, not even grandparents. Before 4 weeks no one could visit. Now visits are permitted but only to look at baby, no touching.

For background baby is healthy, born full term so no issues like that.

AiBU to think this is a bit OTT and precious? Obviously it shouldn't be pass the parcel with a newborn, no kisses, wash hands, stay away if sick etc but I've never seen this level of protection before.

Obviously it's their baby, their rules and I'm not going to break them. I'll visit in a few weeks and keep my distance.

Is this a Gen Z thing? Or are they a bit extreme? I was never this way with my DC nor were any friends and relatives in my age group. We'd usually visit a week or two after and hold baby after washing hands. Maybe I'm just a bit blasé about these, I'm sure there will be plenty of sanctimonious parents in here who'll tell me AIBU

OP posts:
Sunisgettinganewhaton · 04/05/2026 10:06

Bet they accept gifts in manhandled wrapping paper.... All those germs...

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 04/05/2026 10:08

And at least the parents aren’t pushing people to ‘ meet’ (I always eyeroll at that word in that context) the baby and they aren’t getting offended if someone doesn’t want to hold it.

There is a lot to be said for that 😬

bagpuss90 · 04/05/2026 10:14

Unless dad has paternity leave - she’s going to be very isolated when he returns to work

Lavender14 · 04/05/2026 10:16

Ilovelurchers · 04/05/2026 09:28

I really don't like the "their baby, their rules" thing, that you hear so much on Mumsnet.

A baby isn't someone's possession - you can't own anirher person. It's a whole person in its own right.

And, quite rightly, there are laws as to how one must treat a baby - it's not just 'their rules', anything the parent says goes......

Of course, what this baby's parents are doing doesn't constitute abuse at this stage, though this kind of behaviour (isolating the child and denying it appropriate developmental opportunities) can become abusive over time.

The baby needs to realise it's an independent being, separate from it's mother. It's an incremental process that starts at birth.

Surely nobody wants their baby to have separation anxiety.

This is a bit of a leap.

Of course nobody owns another person. But parents are the primary care giver for a baby and developmentally babies feel safest when beside their mothers. They don't recognise themselves as seperate entities for many months. As the primary caregivers the parents are the ones primarily responsible for setting appropriate boundaries and safeguarding their baby. This is also driven by hormones and maternal instinct to protect which is why this role falls more to the mother than anyone else, even the father. So in respect of that piece of biology, yes their child their rules. If you had a child and I decided to treat them how I liked and said that's my decision to make since you don't 'own' them then how would that affect you as a parent? This is why laws uphold parental rights except in cases of abuse.

Their behaviour is not remotely abusive. And there's nothing whatsoever to suggest it will continue past a matter of weeks or hinder the child to the age of 18.

This is also not how seperation anxiety works.

seasmussealife1 · 04/05/2026 12:14

Lavender14 · 04/05/2026 10:16

This is a bit of a leap.

Of course nobody owns another person. But parents are the primary care giver for a baby and developmentally babies feel safest when beside their mothers. They don't recognise themselves as seperate entities for many months. As the primary caregivers the parents are the ones primarily responsible for setting appropriate boundaries and safeguarding their baby. This is also driven by hormones and maternal instinct to protect which is why this role falls more to the mother than anyone else, even the father. So in respect of that piece of biology, yes their child their rules. If you had a child and I decided to treat them how I liked and said that's my decision to make since you don't 'own' them then how would that affect you as a parent? This is why laws uphold parental rights except in cases of abuse.

Their behaviour is not remotely abusive. And there's nothing whatsoever to suggest it will continue past a matter of weeks or hinder the child to the age of 18.

This is also not how seperation anxiety works.

Lol I wonder how they come up that crap that babies think they are still attached to their mother's

Loulou4022 · 04/05/2026 12:19

Batshit crazy and they’ll be on here in a few years moaning that none of their relatives bother with the little one!!

ValhallaCalling · 04/05/2026 12:22

Loulou4022 · 04/05/2026 12:19

Batshit crazy and they’ll be on here in a few years moaning that none of their relatives bother with the little one!!

Probably a good thing if they are the type of people who shun a baby because they had to wait!

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 04/05/2026 12:44

ValhallaCalling · 04/05/2026 12:22

Probably a good thing if they are the type of people who shun a baby because they had to wait!

‘Shun’ a baby? WTF 😬

seasmussealife1 · 04/05/2026 12:45

Loulou4022 · 04/05/2026 12:19

Batshit crazy and they’ll be on here in a few years moaning that none of their relatives bother with the little one!!

Exactly

Mayana1 · 04/05/2026 12:54

Pretfeen · 03/05/2026 16:52

Some relatives recently had a baby. They are quite a young couple in mid 20s and have set a rule that no one is allowed to hold or touch baby until he's at least 12 weeks old, not even grandparents. Before 4 weeks no one could visit. Now visits are permitted but only to look at baby, no touching.

For background baby is healthy, born full term so no issues like that.

AiBU to think this is a bit OTT and precious? Obviously it shouldn't be pass the parcel with a newborn, no kisses, wash hands, stay away if sick etc but I've never seen this level of protection before.

Obviously it's their baby, their rules and I'm not going to break them. I'll visit in a few weeks and keep my distance.

Is this a Gen Z thing? Or are they a bit extreme? I was never this way with my DC nor were any friends and relatives in my age group. We'd usually visit a week or two after and hold baby after washing hands. Maybe I'm just a bit blasé about these, I'm sure there will be plenty of sanctimonious parents in here who'll tell me AIBU

How entitled. Feel sorry for a child, this will be an entitled brat in few years time.

DemelzaandRoss · 04/05/2026 13:06

Completely ridiculous.
Nothing else to say.

ValhallaCalling · 04/05/2026 13:46

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 04/05/2026 12:44

‘Shun’ a baby? WTF 😬

Isn't that what half the people on this thread are crowing about? Not getting their own way and seeing the baby so refusing to babysit and bother with the baby in future? Sounds like shunning someone to me.

Helpforsummer · 04/05/2026 13:48

bluewhitebluewhite · 03/05/2026 17:16

Their baby their rules blah blah. Of course. It’s a bit sad though. A new baby is a joyful thing. I’d be really sorry as a grandparent not to be allowed to hold the new member of the family.

As a mother of three (6,4&1) the only things better than me and my husband holding our babies for the first time was watching our parents hold them - all did within 24 hours and it was bloody magical. The visitors bringing pressies and making me cuppas was equally as great. No one kissed them, every one washed their hands and I asked my cousin not to come when she had cold (she came the following week).
Can't imagine with the third asking my mother to have the big two whilst I gave birth and not letting her back in the house for a month 🤣
What happens to these folks when they have a second child who brings in all of the nursery bugs 🫠

hellomylov3 · 04/05/2026 13:57

Absolutely right helpforsummer. My third got chicken pox at 2 weeks old as my older ones had it when he was born. Children are the ones with the worst illnesses , you don't see those on subsequent dc keeping their newborn away from their siblings. Life goes on, you can't wrap them in a bubble forever.

Floppyearedlab · 04/05/2026 14:31

She will soon be bleating that nobody is interested in her and her PFB. Or will be moaning that 'she doesn't get a break'.
Reap what you sow and all that.

TopPrincess · 04/05/2026 17:52

Don't worry, in a few weeks they'll be begging anyone who's willing to hold the baby for a few minutes and as for breastfeeding, the baby will make up its own mind.

chocolateaddictions · 04/05/2026 17:53

Batshit. I have twins so couldn’t wait for visitors to come round and hold one of them 😂 OP I bet they are anti vaxxers as well.

chocolateaddictions · 04/05/2026 17:56

Helpforsummer · 04/05/2026 13:48

As a mother of three (6,4&1) the only things better than me and my husband holding our babies for the first time was watching our parents hold them - all did within 24 hours and it was bloody magical. The visitors bringing pressies and making me cuppas was equally as great. No one kissed them, every one washed their hands and I asked my cousin not to come when she had cold (she came the following week).
Can't imagine with the third asking my mother to have the big two whilst I gave birth and not letting her back in the house for a month 🤣
What happens to these folks when they have a second child who brings in all of the nursery bugs 🫠

Edited

I agree, the most precious photos I have from newborn days are my parents holding one twin each and my in laws doing the same. First grandchildren for both, boy and girl. The joy on their faces almost makes me weep when I see those photos. ❤️

RosyDaysAhead · 04/05/2026 17:59

It’s just typical first time mum nerves but they’ve read every horror story that has increased their fears beyond the norm.

In suspect that once the initial baby rose tinted glasses have slipped and they are tired with a baby who is teething or going through sleep regression, they will be cross that no one is helping them.

I had some weird ideas when my son was born. But they soon fizzled out when I realised the baby bubble had burst and I was exhausted and the baby wanted to be held all the times

jdb9803 · 04/05/2026 17:59

Whoooville · 03/05/2026 17:10

Maybe they'll be just fine without you and the other whiney relatives who can't bear to just let them recover from birth and enjoy their baby for what is realistically a tiny amount of time.

Yet they are happy to visit and hold other people's babies when they are just days old - so one rule for their baby and another rule for all the others

Jayne35 · 04/05/2026 18:00

My Mum babysat my first overnight at 2 weeks, I was exhausted and couldn't function, was only 21 and it was a shock getting no sleep. My Mum and daughter have a brilliant close relationship (she is 30 now) and I'm so glad I did things that way..

jdb9803 · 04/05/2026 18:02

ValhallaCalling · 04/05/2026 12:22

Probably a good thing if they are the type of people who shun a baby because they had to wait!

They aren't shunning the baby - they are fed up with the 100 rules they have to follow when they visit - so don't bother

Tableforjoan · 04/05/2026 18:03

jdb9803 · 04/05/2026 17:59

Yet they are happy to visit and hold other people's babies when they are just days old - so one rule for their baby and another rule for all the others

I don’t want to hold other peoples babies either.

Id rather do your washing up tbh.

LaughingCat · 04/05/2026 18:04

Xennial here (ridiculous name they’ve coined for Millennials that are almost Gen X). Had our first child last October and absolutely no visits for the first 6 weeks, at which point we said holding was fine but no kissing and no strong scents. Other than that, we’ve been the kind of parents that are letting her explore the world in her own time and we’re definitely letting her take her chances and develop a robust immune system!

However, I love that younger parents are setting strong boundaries - for all those saying ‘well, everyone I know was fine with kissing the baby at the hospital the day after’, that’s cool for you. But, if research clearly shows that it’s safer in those early weeks to limit outside contact, then the rules are saving some lives somewhere. And if it helps first time parents to feel a little more in control and less overwhelmed, then get off your high horses and let them have that.

Swiftie1878 · 04/05/2026 18:05

Pretfeen · 03/05/2026 17:01

Whooville, its pretty clear you subscribe to same school of thought as my relatives.

It’s the Gina Ford book of parenting.