Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School Readiness

325 replies

MissLead · 22/01/2026 12:42

So on the news this morning it was reported that 37% of kids going to school in UK are not deemed ‘ready’ often lacking basic speech and not being toilet trained.

Assuming these kids have no medical conditions - there must be some bloody lazy parents out there!!

OP posts:
Partiedout · 22/01/2026 16:50

Fizzyfruitdrink · 22/01/2026 16:47

The examples you use shouldn't be having children in the first place. They are unfit parents way beyond lack of potty training. Horrendous what they inflict on their beautiful innocent kids due to selfishness and poor choices.

Abuse usually starts after pregnancy.

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 22/01/2026 16:51

Kirbert2 · 22/01/2026 16:38

and completely discriminates against the SEND children or children with other medical reasons who are unable to be potty trained by 4.

Edited

You know very well that no-one is suggesting that these rules should be applied to SEN children. The VAST majority of children- SEN or not- can be toilet trained by 3 and I would say that most children can be out of nappies by 2 with enough effort and consistency. The issue isn't the tiny percentage of children who can't be toilet trained, but the large number of children who could be but aren't.

NewPinkJacket · 22/01/2026 16:52

5128gap · 22/01/2026 16:41

I have no expectations of parents and children.
I do however have some knowledge of poverty and the impact that has on behaviour and I'm merely trying to explain to you the link between absolute poverty and gaps in parenting.
You can of course dismiss the findings of academic research in favour of hyperbole about the impact on your digestive system if you choose.
However seeing this issue purely in terms of individual failing, rather than something that is becoming an increasing pattern in our society, isn't going to identify and address the root cause.
No parent did a better job to avoid churning your stomach. Plenty do a lot better when their basic needs of survival are met.

Just stop please.

You're doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of children anywhere and you've made it quite obvious that you have no expectations.

If a parent really wanted to make sure their kids knew how books worked, they absolutely would spend a few pence in a charity shop or ask on their local FB group if anyone is having a clear-out.

Since the dawn of time parents have made sure their poverty impacts their children as little as possible.

chateauneufdupapa · 22/01/2026 16:53

It’s laziness (overuse of screens and lack of conversation) and lack of education.

Lucelulu · 22/01/2026 16:53

Partiedout · 22/01/2026 16:43

Many women live in abusive relationships so yes they may not have the headspace to be the best possible parent. In the past these people would have had much more intervention and support but now the first time they become 'known' is when the DC start school. The previous government actively decided to remove funding that supports these women and children.

You live in a position where you cannot imagine how some people live in the UK and that is great. But that comes from a place of luck and privilege not superiority.

Edited

You don’t know the position I live in, nor what my familiarity is or otherwise with the family court and the police in that regard.
I have however read this report, 37% not school ready. I agree there are outliers with extreme circumstances but I think absolving the remainder of that 37% of parents because some live in extreme circumstances, some have SEN etc. is not useful either.
I believe we need BOTH - more social support, Surestart, good advocacy and social justice AND to stop absolving parents of individual caring responsibility amounting to neglect.

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 22/01/2026 16:55

NewPinkJacket · 22/01/2026 16:52

Just stop please.

You're doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of children anywhere and you've made it quite obvious that you have no expectations.

If a parent really wanted to make sure their kids knew how books worked, they absolutely would spend a few pence in a charity shop or ask on their local FB group if anyone is having a clear-out.

Since the dawn of time parents have made sure their poverty impacts their children as little as possible.

It seems to me like parenting got worse when every criticism of obvious poor parenting got called "Mum shaming" and not allowed. It's more frowned upon now to say that it's lazy not to potty train a child than it is to not potty train a child.

Fizzyfruitdrink · 22/01/2026 16:57

Abuse doesn't prevent potty training whilst the non abuser parent leaves the relationship.

Too many excuses for bad parenting. If you don't want to raise them don't have them

Partiedout · 22/01/2026 16:58

Lucelulu · 22/01/2026 16:53

You don’t know the position I live in, nor what my familiarity is or otherwise with the family court and the police in that regard.
I have however read this report, 37% not school ready. I agree there are outliers with extreme circumstances but I think absolving the remainder of that 37% of parents because some live in extreme circumstances, some have SEN etc. is not useful either.
I believe we need BOTH - more social support, Surestart, good advocacy and social justice AND to stop absolving parents of individual caring responsibility amounting to neglect.

You've read the full report or a headline in a newpaper? You've said your position is that you cannot imagine someone not having money to buy DC books in a charity shop, I haven't made an assessment of you.

Kirbert2 · 22/01/2026 17:01

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 22/01/2026 16:51

You know very well that no-one is suggesting that these rules should be applied to SEN children. The VAST majority of children- SEN or not- can be toilet trained by 3 and I would say that most children can be out of nappies by 2 with enough effort and consistency. The issue isn't the tiny percentage of children who can't be toilet trained, but the large number of children who could be but aren't.

and how can people magically tell that difference at just 4? Especially when many children are still undiagnosed at that age?

ForumMouseGuards · 22/01/2026 17:01

bonnnn · 22/01/2026 14:37

What a load of utter shite

TA of 14 years here in a (private) primary in a very middle class area.

I wish this wasn't true - I have seen this happen.

It's definitely got worse since Covid. Lots more not toilet trained in Reception. More kids with weak fine motor skills so they can't dress or undress themselves - even going into Year 2, some still can't do zips or buttons. Many still eat with their fingers and don't know how to use a knife and fork. Very poor problem solving skills. I see this in NT pupils as well as SEND.

Not sure what the root cause is - probably many things.

ERthree · 22/01/2026 17:02

Coffeeandbooks88 · 22/01/2026 15:47

And all the SEN kids? Not sure why people say this like it is a good thing?

From 1985 to 2000 i never had one single child start Playgroup (age 3) late because they weren't out of nappies. Wonder why that was ?

Betsyboost · 22/01/2026 17:07

Partiedout · 22/01/2026 16:43

Many women live in abusive relationships so yes they may not have the headspace to be the best possible parent. In the past these people would have had much more intervention and support but now the first time they become 'known' is when the DC start school. The previous government actively decided to remove funding that supports these women and children.

You live in a position where you cannot imagine how some people live in the UK and that is great. But that comes from a place of luck and privilege not superiority.

Edited

I agree. Far, far less money should be paid out in benefits for ‘disability’ payments for under 10s with ASD etc and instead more money should be ploughed into bringing back sure start.

Lucelulu · 22/01/2026 17:07

Partiedout · 22/01/2026 16:58

You've read the full report or a headline in a newpaper? You've said your position is that you cannot imagine someone not having money to buy DC books in a charity shop, I haven't made an assessment of you.

This certainly appears to be your assessment of me:

You live in a position where you cannot imagine how some people live in the UK and that is great. But that comes from a place of luck and privilege not superiority.

And yes, I have read (maybe rather scanned and read the bits that are of interest to me) the report after I saw the headline this morning. This is the link should you like to do so too:

https://kindredsquared.org.uk/school-readiness-survey/

SR Survey 25 Featured Image

School Readiness Survey

School Readiness Survey For the past six years, Kindred² has surveyed thousands of teachers and parents to source robust evidence of the proportion of children that are considered 'school ready', comparing this to perceptions of parents.We use this sch...

https://kindredsquared.org.uk/school-readiness-survey/

Rover83 · 22/01/2026 17:08

The EYFS teacher at my DSs school say that they had plenty this year who weren't toilet trained, lots who wouldn't/couldn't sit and listen to a story and a lot who didn't know how to use cutlery.

I didn't ask for specifics obviously but it'd be fascinating for people to do actual research into why this is. The 2-3 year old early years funding was supposed to help even the playing field but clearly some kids are still being left behind. Sadly thing is parents who are less engaged with their kids are not going to engage with school or surveys so hard to figure out what's happening

Coffeeandbooks88 · 22/01/2026 17:09

Fizzyfruitdrink · 22/01/2026 16:41

That is the excuse those who parent to a poor standard use. They need to face their parental duties and ultimately their kids should know if their parents failed them.

Cutting benefits punishes the kids.

Betsyboost · 22/01/2026 17:13

People who cannot afford books cannot afford kids.

People who don’t have the time to potty train their kids don’t have the time to have kids.

Kirbert2 · 22/01/2026 17:14

Betsyboost · 22/01/2026 17:07

I agree. Far, far less money should be paid out in benefits for ‘disability’ payments for under 10s with ASD etc and instead more money should be ploughed into bringing back sure start.

Why 'disability'? Do you think Autism isn't a disability?

Fizzyfruitdrink · 22/01/2026 17:15

Betsyboost · 22/01/2026 17:13

People who cannot afford books cannot afford kids.

People who don’t have the time to potty train their kids don’t have the time to have kids.

Well said

Playingvideogames · 22/01/2026 17:15

Coffeeandbooks88 · 22/01/2026 17:09

Cutting benefits punishes the kids.

Benefits destroy lives.

At work I see the same thing time and time again. School leaver (18/19), works for a couple of years, then quits or gets fired and signs onto benefits. Usually staying with family so the fact it’s only £450 is just pocket money for them. After a few years of sleeping all day, gaming and spending the money on vapes/weed/takeaways, they’re almost unemployable with no work ethic and borderline addictions. A few more years of this and they add a couple of mental health labels to their belt - hello PIP. Then they have a few kids, and its benefits kerching. The kids are then brought up by hopeless selfish parents who barely know what day of the week it is and are unemployable due to ‘MH’ (aka long term laziness and addiction). Kids brought up badly and cycle continues.

I often wonder what would’ve happened had we never allowed them to claim to start with.

Partiedout · 22/01/2026 17:16

Betsyboost · 22/01/2026 17:07

I agree. Far, far less money should be paid out in benefits for ‘disability’ payments for under 10s with ASD etc and instead more money should be ploughed into bringing back sure start.

I doubt there would be enough money in your plan to open one sure start centre.

Coffeeishot · 22/01/2026 17:21

Betsyboost · 22/01/2026 17:07

I agree. Far, far less money should be paid out in benefits for ‘disability’ payments for under 10s with ASD etc and instead more money should be ploughed into bringing back sure start.

You don't want children to get disability benefits ? I am assuming you are just being a goady fecker now,

Needlenardlenoo · 22/01/2026 17:23

ERthree · 22/01/2026 17:02

From 1985 to 2000 i never had one single child start Playgroup (age 3) late because they weren't out of nappies. Wonder why that was ?

This contemporaneous report on the labour market from the ONS suggests one reason.

I did manage to get my daughter toilet trained by 3 (just) but I remember it was very difficult co-ordinating with nursery.

School Readiness
Kitte321 · 22/01/2026 17:24

100% bring back sure starts. We need more investment in great early years provisions with rigorous checks and balances.
We need more health visitors and better access to support services.
But yes. Anecdotally, the standard of parenting seems to be in decline and I am regularly shocked by the behaviour in primary schools.

Fizzyfruitdrink · 22/01/2026 17:26

Coffeeandbooks88 and Coffeeishot

Are defending poor parenting. Interesting coffee link!

5128gap · 22/01/2026 17:26

NewPinkJacket · 22/01/2026 16:52

Just stop please.

You're doing absolutely nothing to improve the lives of children anywhere and you've made it quite obvious that you have no expectations.

If a parent really wanted to make sure their kids knew how books worked, they absolutely would spend a few pence in a charity shop or ask on their local FB group if anyone is having a clear-out.

Since the dawn of time parents have made sure their poverty impacts their children as little as possible.

I worked for many years directly addressing child poverty as it happens. And now indirectly support children via work with vulnerable women.
However, I will leave you to your assumptions as I see your mind is closed on the subject.