To wonder if past trauma was a factor in the Renee Nicole Good murder and that, while not absolving agent, it shows ICE should select agents more carefully?

[Carla786]

Reading this from the BBC, I wonder if the agent was suffering from previous trauma. They had earlier been in the Iraq War and then had huge number of stitches after being dragged by a car while arresting apparently a 'child sex offender' illicit migrant last March.

Thus I wonder if, because Renee Good clipped them with the car earlier(as The Times indicates), shooting at her car as she drove past was less a rational decision borne from evil and more an instinctive reaction from recent trauma with cars on the job?

This is NOT an excuse. But I wonder if it also shows that ICE are selecting traumatised agents who are too dangerous, due to this, to be in that position?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx4qd4d16no

Greg Bovino using chemical gas against the protestors yesterday was blatant. He knows he’s on video and doesn’t care. The same with the agents using the five-year-old boy as bait, not only are they doing something completely repugnant, but they know that they have the complete backing of the president to do whatever the fuck they want.

I suppose when they started off by shooting a woman dead they basically knew they could do anything.

He's got small man syndrome. He's enjoying cosplaying as Himmler, see the coat he's got himself. He walks about shouting at people while flanked by burly men.

'Because the Mayor did not try to stoke unrest. That is another of your lies. He was quite clear in calling for peace.'

Telling ICE to get the fuck out is indeed stoking unrest. It would seem a massive stretch to say otherwise.

You are the ones spreading misinformation. You make wild claims that you’ll never walk back, you just move on as if nothing ever happened.

Maybe next time you hear a story like that, you’ll wait for the full facts to come out. Usually it takes a day or two …

Facts like when everyone heard Trump say Iceland but Leavitt said he didn't?

wtf but whatabout this, whatabout that?

Try to stay on topic

Just wondering where you get your facts from

You should watch his speech in full.

She made such a fool of herself with that one. I wonder whether that will be what gets to her in the end - not the representation and furthering of the aims of an evil man and regime with outright lies, but embarrassment of looking like as much as a fool as he does.

I think it’s likely Trump will never face any legal consequences for his actions, given his age and current untouchable status. But I’m surprised Karoline hasn’t thought about the long-term implications.

I think you’ll be wondering for all eternity 😆

Why ignore everything in every post and just attack?
It is very likely he does have some form of dementia but as predicted that is the only part of the post you pick up on. What is your agenda?

Not at all he said they need to leave...that is the only way to calm down a situation you dont supress public opinion by militart action that is exactly what Trump is supposedly against in Iran, and what most saine people objected to in china and at Penn State.
The mayor objecting to breach of the constitution and protecting his citizens is exactly what he was elected to do.

That coat is something else. They are acting with such impunity. I think about how long it took for Nazi war criminals to face consequences, but it did eventually happen.

You've wholly misunderstood my point. Violence is wrong.

They’re reporting on poor Liam Ramos on Channel 4 now. I think anybody that can look at the pictures of that poor little kid with his Spider-Man backpack and wooly bunny hat and feel anything other than horror is part of the horror themselves.

This thread alerted me to the 5 year old child report- just awful and this thread is a depressing reflection of some people's level of humanity!

It is on topic its all about bad leadership anc criminal actions if someone goes as a leader to talk about a country everh nation is worried about and he is arguing about the geographical importance but cant even name the right country there is something seriously wrong. If the same oerson sends in paramilitary organisations to do a job in his own country there is domething really wrong.

Agreed but I suppose that makes it worth keeping on posting, if not interacting directly with that contingent.

Yeah …. about that ….

https://x.com/dhsgov/status/2014357350329532886?s=46&t=LHu5hEVEgoG4lIIfMesJGA

So the dad legged it and abandoned his kid. Now they’ll be deported because it appears none of the family have a legitimate basis for asylum.

The poster said 'Dementia Don' which is using a serious and distressing medical condition to mock sufferers. It isn't ok. Bit lke calling everyone nazis who are carrying out immigatrion enforcement.

My 'agenda' is to challenge some of the batshit whataboutery and misinformation on this thread.

God the depths of depravity to defend what happened to that little boy. Fuck me.

Below are the actual facts, although, back in the ‘there’s no acceptable reason to use a five-year-old boy as a pawn’ universe it should be irrelevant.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/21/ice-arrests-five-year-old-boy-minnesota

It would be hilarious is it wasn't such a serious situation but some posters seriously think officers are going round arresting 5yr olds .

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/21/ice-arrests-five-year-old-boy-minnesota

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/01/22/minnesota-ice-columbia-heights-school/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyrrqwxpz7o.amp

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/5-year-asylum-seeker-detained-ice-expands-enforcement/story?id=129451987

www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/ice-detains-5-year-old-boy-minnesota-tp8pq0fbm?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqccfpoI9diyCoEY9Dsbn2IlXARof0JnI8r16X8o4fS0maMWCJLvc6zmKeoW9rw%3D&gaa_ts=697265f3&gaa_sig=x7uCIF1ZA541r_WY_Yge93fDfYlNcRpaNdJaVy1G7A3KDjNsK_QOe5z6Aw_RSsXVOvoVZI4BxUBUl403jEd_lg%3D%3D

The DHS are the last people I'd go to for an impartial and honest assessment. It's a bit like getting your news from Pravda, only in English.

Yes. Also they had an asylum case pending. This is literally the legal way to go about it. They were in the US legally.

Regardless though, what kind of a person would someone have to be to ever condone this being done to a little boy, regardless of his or his parent’s legal status. To then be someone that lies about it…