Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Anyone else terrified!!

221 replies

Netflixandchill25 · 15/05/2025 22:13

I’m starting to find all these deals between Trump and the dodgy Middle East nations quite scary. Latest being the AI deal with Abu Dhabi.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
rubicustellitall · 16/05/2025 16:27

No amount of you being terrified is going to make an ounce of difference.

Socrateswasrightaboutvoting · 16/05/2025 16:35

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/05/2025 16:25

Well I guess that means that any Brit’s opinion on the US in this thread is irrelevant.

Oops…didn’t think this one through did you? 😂🤣

Go ask the indigenous People how valuable they think your contribution is...

Brits are entitled to have an opinion, it doesn't make it valid though.

deusexmacintosh · 16/05/2025 17:01

PhilomenaPunk · 15/05/2025 22:37

Dodgy Middle East nations? What exactly makes them dodgy? @Netflixandchill25

Have you been living under a rock?

The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, the lad Trump's just done a deal, with is a violent misogynist who had a journalist called Jamal Khashoggi murdered for speaking out against his repressive regime.

In Saudi Arabia, homosexuality is a crime punishable by DEATH.

Is this genocidal dictator really the sort of man you want backing the West? Because wherever American goes, the UK follows.

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/05/2025 17:02

Socrateswasrightaboutvoting · 16/05/2025 16:35

Go ask the indigenous People how valuable they think your contribution is...

Brits are entitled to have an opinion, it doesn't make it valid though.

Yeah, so once again, as this little inconvenience often is forgotten.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.
There is another very important point to keep in mind: European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Native American control and settlement of that land looked different to European eyes. Nonetheless, Native American groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion.

https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/colonial-settlement-1600-1763/overview/#:~:text=In%20the%20early%201600s%2C%20in,to%20deal%20with%20that%20invasion.

The US did not exist until 1776. Don’t blame us 😁

Overview | Colonial Settlement, 1600s - 1763 | U.S. History Primary Source Timeline | Classroom Materials at the Library of Congress | Library of Congress

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America.

https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/colonial-settlement-1600-1763/overview#:~:text=In%20the%20early%201600s%2C%20in,to%20deal%20with%20that%20invasion.

PhilomenaPunk · 16/05/2025 17:07

deusexmacintosh · 16/05/2025 17:01

Have you been living under a rock?

The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, the lad Trump's just done a deal, with is a violent misogynist who had a journalist called Jamal Khashoggi murdered for speaking out against his repressive regime.

In Saudi Arabia, homosexuality is a crime punishable by DEATH.

Is this genocidal dictator really the sort of man you want backing the West? Because wherever American goes, the UK follows.

I hate to break it to you but the UK is already doing deals with Middle Eastern countries. And the West’s track record when it comes to genocide is pretty impressive already. My point has never been about whether or not countries in the Middle East are committing atrocities, but rather that this ridiculous sense of moral superiority the West seems to perceive itself to have is harmful, blatantly untrue and racist.

So again, why call the Middle East “dodgy” but not the West?

CaptainMyCaptain · 16/05/2025 17:12

I was extremely worried in the early 80s when nuclear war was a real possibility. I'm concerned and somewhat depressed now but not terrified.

JHound · 16/05/2025 18:10

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/05/2025 16:25

Well I guess that means that any Brit’s opinion on the US in this thread is irrelevant.

Oops…didn’t think this one through did you? 😂🤣

I mean they’re both colonisers so….(not an individual fighting back against a colonising entity.)

JHound · 16/05/2025 18:12

deusexmacintosh · 16/05/2025 17:01

Have you been living under a rock?

The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, the lad Trump's just done a deal, with is a violent misogynist who had a journalist called Jamal Khashoggi murdered for speaking out against his repressive regime.

In Saudi Arabia, homosexuality is a crime punishable by DEATH.

Is this genocidal dictator really the sort of man you want backing the West? Because wherever American goes, the UK follows.

I mean we have been doing business with them for years. It’s not a new thing.

JHound · 16/05/2025 18:14

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/05/2025 17:02

Yeah, so once again, as this little inconvenience often is forgotten.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.
There is another very important point to keep in mind: European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Native American control and settlement of that land looked different to European eyes. Nonetheless, Native American groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion.

https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/colonial-settlement-1600-1763/overview/#:~:text=In%20the%20early%201600s%2C%20in,to%20deal%20with%20that%20invasion.

The US did not exist until 1776. Don’t blame us 😁

It’s still a colonising force. You don’t stop being colonisers because you stayed (and spread far beyond the original “colonies”).

I think that PPs point is the colonisers opinion as to whether the people they are oppressing are terrorists or not is never valid.

Weepixie · 16/05/2025 18:27

swimsong · 16/05/2025 14:30

Where to start?

How about with Qatar - which has been a key financial supporter of Hamas, giving them more than $1.8 billion over the last couple of decades.

How much has Israel received from their bankers or is that different?

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/05/2025 18:37

JHound · 16/05/2025 18:14

It’s still a colonising force. You don’t stop being colonisers because you stayed (and spread far beyond the original “colonies”).

I think that PPs point is the colonisers opinion as to whether the people they are oppressing are terrorists or not is never valid.

Yeah I don’t think that’s how it works.

Dorisbonson · 16/05/2025 21:04

Netflixandchill25 · 16/05/2025 13:14

That’s actually hilarious. You know the information you can access is heavily censored right? What about the women held against their will, employers hold their passports, not allowed mobile phones? You only have to glance at the Facebook groups, the way WOMEN are traded as property. “Nanny swaps” etc.

So you haven't been here and don't understand it?

You want to tell me what it's like here without actually being here?

You lack any credibility and your opinion is worthless then.

Whatifitallgoesright · 16/05/2025 21:09

Netflixandchill25 · 15/05/2025 22:20

My news consumption is limited to the BBC app!

That is unreasonable.

Doggymummar · 16/05/2025 21:12

I would be more concerned about India and Pakistan myself. My partner was on a disaster planning call today for what they need to do if/when it goes nuclear. We are in the UK but they have offices in both countries, international Bank.

StickyCoffee · 16/05/2025 23:29

BeyondTheReef · 16/05/2025 01:39

My young adult child died this year. I refuse to waste my life worrying about things I cannot control, and don’t have the headspace to be concerned. It put everything into perspective.

I am so so sorry this happened to your family. Nothing else in the wider world must seem that important right now x

JHound · 17/05/2025 00:02

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/05/2025 18:37

Yeah I don’t think that’s how it works.

It is.

saltinesandcoffeecups · 17/05/2025 01:29

JHound · 17/05/2025 00:02

It is.

Really? If colonization occurs 100 years prior by nation X to nation Y forming you think nation Y’s citizens do what… move somewhere else? How does that work? Where do they go? Not sure nation X is going to be keen to take them in.

Is it really that difficult for you to admit that the British Government historically has been one of the most prolific colonizers in history. What was that saying… Something sun something setting on the British flag?

I mean it’s hard to be smug and all when you as a nation are part of the problem.

Now sure anything past the point of nation Y forming is on them. But if you note a lot of the landmass in the US was purchased from other colonizers.

Since I believe this thread started with the SA (although I’ll admit it’s getting late). So if that’s correct then yeah… once again good ol’ Britain (and the Dutch) seem to the original colonizers. 😁

Socrateswasrightaboutvoting · 17/05/2025 02:47

saltinesandcoffeecups · 17/05/2025 01:29

Really? If colonization occurs 100 years prior by nation X to nation Y forming you think nation Y’s citizens do what… move somewhere else? How does that work? Where do they go? Not sure nation X is going to be keen to take them in.

Is it really that difficult for you to admit that the British Government historically has been one of the most prolific colonizers in history. What was that saying… Something sun something setting on the British flag?

I mean it’s hard to be smug and all when you as a nation are part of the problem.

Now sure anything past the point of nation Y forming is on them. But if you note a lot of the landmass in the US was purchased from other colonizers.

Since I believe this thread started with the SA (although I’ll admit it’s getting late). So if that’s correct then yeah… once again good ol’ Britain (and the Dutch) seem to the original colonizers. 😁

Talk to Frank.

Socrateswasrightaboutvoting · 17/05/2025 12:03

TempestTost · 16/05/2025 02:08

🙄

?

SpringGreenOnion · 17/05/2025 18:11

Pyew · 16/05/2025 13:30

I thought he was after a plane from them. Not much to worry about, the guy's always getting handouts.

thankfully our current government wouldn’t dream of enjoying freebies and handouts eh?

tilypu · 17/05/2025 18:27

NineteenSeventyNine · 15/05/2025 22:15

Anyone who isn’t seriously concerned about what the US government is doing has their head firmly in the sand, at best. YANBU.

It's not that.

It's just that life is too short to be worrying about shit you can do nothing about.

When you've lived through the cold war, when you watched terrifying educational videos about what to do on event of nuclear war when you were in primary school, when you've lived through news story after news story about wars in other countries, some of which people you know have served in, when you've been aware of many a dodgy political alliance, of famine and drought and forest fires and climate change, when you've experienced winds of over 100mph and power cuts that have lasted days on end, when you've survived extreme poverty (not eating anything for days) - well, I guess pragmatism wins over. You do the things you can do, and don't worry about the stuff you can do nothing about. Eventually we'll all be dead, so might do the best we can to enjoy the time we have.

Musclewoman · 17/05/2025 22:39

PhilomenaPunk · 16/05/2025 07:59

Firstly, you’re not funny. Secondly, as a Kurdish person I certainly do not think Saddam Hussein was a good bloke. Thirdly, this is nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with being sick of people making wildly racist assumptions about nations outside the West. The US is a supremely “dodgy” nation itself. So why did the OP frame it as if the US is functional? Abortion is no longer a constitutional right. Child marriage is still legal in most states. Hundred of thousands of people go bankrupt every year due to medical bills. There are vast swathes of corruption. Hun crime through the roof. School shootings. Domestic terrorism. Endemic racism. And so on and on and on. So which country is “dodgy” again?

I am funny. And you are a racist.
Look forward to your next essay which I won't read....
Too much time on your hands.

Grapewrath · 17/05/2025 22:40

No im not. Op switch off mainstream and social media and live your life.

Echobelly · 17/05/2025 22:42

Of all the things to be terrified about I'm less concerned about that than I am about a lot of other things America is doing.

PhilomenaPunk · 17/05/2025 22:51

Musclewoman · 17/05/2025 22:39

I am funny. And you are a racist.
Look forward to your next essay which I won't read....
Too much time on your hands.

And yet you responded. I always find it so strange when someone actively joins and engages with an online discussion forum and then tries to “win” an argument by claiming to not be interested in the responses they receive. Not able to formulate anything more intelligent? Please try for a more original comeback next time.

Swipe left for the next trending thread