Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - you have blood on your hands

737 replies

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:14

Am I being unreasonable to say that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - the Duke of York and member of the Royal Family has blood on his hands following the tragic suicide of Virginia Giuffre?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has faced zero consequences for his role in Virginia Giuffre‘s sexual abuse and trafficking because he’s rich and his powerful mummy paid off the victim and the British police failed to pursue charges against him. To be clear, while the age of consent in the UK is 17 years old this does not apply to trafficking victims and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has never faced criminal charges.

He probably thinks he’s got away with it now she’s gone.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14649791/Virginia-Giuffre-suicide-perth-mansion.html

OP posts:
HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 07:16

i dont think he has blood on his hands.
how many years ago was this?

KenAdams · 26/04/2025 07:17

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 07:16

i dont think he has blood on his hands.
how many years ago was this?

What is the correct number of years you should take to get over being trafficked and raped exactly?

araiwa · 26/04/2025 07:18

I've never heard him called that before

Age of consent in UK is 17?

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:20

It’s interesting that you believe the passage of time absolves him of any guilt. Not that he’s not guilty because it never happened - but that it was so long ago that he is absolved.

I believe that the passage of time is not a reason to absolve him of his crime. He never faced any real repercussions for what he did.

Virginia has paid for his crime and the crimes of his close friend Jeffrey Epstein with her life.

OP posts:
HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 07:21

there must be more than this to her life though

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 07:22

@HelenWheels

I assume I’m you are a supporter of the Windsors ?
Your post neatly sums up royalist attitudes to that family - deflecting and downplaying their crimes . How many years ago ?? As if that matters . You ought to be ashamed of yourself .

Thankfully attitudes like yours are in tiny minority

Lifestooshort71 · 26/04/2025 07:22

araiwa · 26/04/2025 07:18

I've never heard him called that before

Age of consent in UK is 17?

No, it's 16.

Phoebepeeby · 26/04/2025 07:22

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 07:21

there must be more than this to her life though

Wtf. You’ve never suffered trauma?

Kingoftheroad · 26/04/2025 07:22

Poor poor woman. She’s been killed.

MoreChocPls · 26/04/2025 07:23

I’m sure there’s so much to this story than people know but at the end of the day, this woman had kids and family and the loss of her in tragic circumstance will be more than enough to deal with, let alone all the speculation and comments. Sympathies with her family.

IDontHateRainbows · 26/04/2025 07:23

How can you be so very sure that this was the reason for her suicide and that nothing else had happened since however many years ago to make her want to end her life?

Iudncuewbccgrcb · 26/04/2025 07:23

I don't think he has faced zero consequences. He's basically lost his job, his home, his social status and become someone that anyone with any sense keeps as far away from their functions as possible.

Everyone is laughing at him and thinks he is vile.

For someone like him that's probably worse than prison.

He'd be as welcome at a ribbon cutting these days as Saville.

FamilyPhoto · 26/04/2025 07:24

KenAdams · 26/04/2025 07:17

What is the correct number of years you should take to get over being trafficked and raped exactly?

Well said.

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 07:24

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 07:22

@HelenWheels

I assume I’m you are a supporter of the Windsors ?
Your post neatly sums up royalist attitudes to that family - deflecting and downplaying their crimes . How many years ago ?? As if that matters . You ought to be ashamed of yourself .

Thankfully attitudes like yours are in tiny minority

why should I be ashamed?
that is ridiculous

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:24

Lifestooshort71 · 26/04/2025 07:22

No, it's 16.

The age of consent is not aged 16 when a person is trafficked for sex.

I swear, the Firm must be paying for people to spread disinformation.

She was sex trafficked. She was under the age of 18 when she was trafficked so it was rape. He never faced charges.

OP posts:
Lifestooshort71 · 26/04/2025 07:24

Kingoftheroad · 26/04/2025 07:22

Poor poor woman. She’s been killed.

Has she? Really?

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:25

Iudncuewbccgrcb · 26/04/2025 07:23

I don't think he has faced zero consequences. He's basically lost his job, his home, his social status and become someone that anyone with any sense keeps as far away from their functions as possible.

Everyone is laughing at him and thinks he is vile.

For someone like him that's probably worse than prison.

He'd be as welcome at a ribbon cutting these days as Saville.

He never lost his home. He’s still living with that ginger woman in mansion.

OP posts:
LlynTegid · 26/04/2025 07:25

I think the title of Duke of York should have been removed from him years ago.

Londonrach1 · 26/04/2025 07:26

Did wonder if she been killed. Yanbu . Poor lady. What horrible memories she must have had.

hazelnutvanillalatte · 26/04/2025 07:26

Oh no, didn't hear of this :( so in a way she was right that she didn't have much time left

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:28

Lifestooshort71 · 26/04/2025 07:22

No, it's 16.

No - it isn’t if you’ve been trafficked for sex. She was under the age of 18 and was sex trafficked so it was a crime.

It could be proven she was sex trafficked. She fought for years and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor never faced criminal charges. He got away with it. He has blood on his hands.

OP posts:
Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:29

LlynTegid · 26/04/2025 07:25

I think the title of Duke of York should have been removed from him years ago.

I agree

OP posts:
gottakeeponmoving · 26/04/2025 07:29

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:25

He never lost his home. He’s still living with that ginger woman in mansion.

You lost me at ‘that ginger woman’.

CurlewKate · 26/04/2025 07:30

Iudncuewbccgrcb · 26/04/2025 07:23

I don't think he has faced zero consequences. He's basically lost his job, his home, his social status and become someone that anyone with any sense keeps as far away from their functions as possible.

Everyone is laughing at him and thinks he is vile.

For someone like him that's probably worse than prison.

He'd be as welcome at a ribbon cutting these days as Saville.

Did you see him at the Coronation? With the RF at Easter?

Lifestooshort71 · 26/04/2025 07:30

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:24

The age of consent is not aged 16 when a person is trafficked for sex.

I swear, the Firm must be paying for people to spread disinformation.

She was sex trafficked. She was under the age of 18 when she was trafficked so it was rape. He never faced charges.

Looney tunes out in force on this one. He's a thick entitled sleazeball, agreed, but not charged or convicted of any offence. Don't bother with a slanging match as I won't be reading it.