Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - you have blood on your hands

[Muffinmam]

Am I being unreasonable to say that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - the Duke of York and member of the Royal Family has blood on his hands following the tragic suicide of Virginia Giuffre?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has faced zero consequences for his role in Virginia Giuffre‘s sexual abuse and trafficking because he’s rich and his powerful mummy paid off the victim and the British police failed to pursue charges against him. To be clear, while the age of consent in the UK is 17 years old this does not apply to trafficking victims and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has never faced criminal charges.

He probably thinks he’s got away with it now she’s gone.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14649791/Virginia-Giuffre-suicide-perth-mansion.html

How do you know he did not have good reason to limit access to their children, how do you know everything going on and not what people chose to take from the media?

In prison, why?

Prince Andrew was not convicted of anything , he was not charged with anything. The principle of innocent until proven guilty is just as important and relevant for a person in the public eye as for a private person.

So of all the things that have happened in her life, including being estranged from her children, it was Prince Andrew who tipped her over the edge??

Do get a grip - maybe try and find something useful to occupy your time with.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. It’s illegal to buy sexual services from anyone under 18, though — even though 16–17-year-olds can legally consent to sex.

Raped by whom?

Do you think the £12m pay off has anything to do with this?

Having sex with a trafficked person is basically rape. Or should be if it's not already.

How do we know anything for sure? How do we know she was abused by Andrew? It’s her word against his. Nothing has ever been proved or disproved.

How do you know the extent of any relationship between PA and VG, if there was any relationship at all.

”I can well believe Andrew to be arrogant, entitled, not very bright, a poor judge of character, too easily flattered but I do not believe he would have sex with anyone without consent. No-one in his position, with years of being in the public eye, and of the gutter press, would be that stupid.”

@Meadowfinch

you seem to be implying in your post that Virginia Guiffre was able to consent to sex with Andrew Windsor

Are you not aware that trafficked women and girls are not able to consent ??

So you think there is time limit to when you are "over" being sexually assaulted? Fair enough

I know i agree

You said "While the age of consent in the UK is 17 years old...". You know perfectly well that pp were correcting that. It is misleading to attack them and pretend they are spreading misinformation.

Charles was friends with Laurens Van Der Post , Jimmy Saville, nephew of Mounbatten, Bishop Peter Ball - all notorious paedophiles. Indeed he remained friends with the Bishop and helped him with accomodation after he was outed just like Andrew with Epstein. There is something seriously wrong in their moral compasses to put it mildly.

Exactly

@Muffinmam he does not have blood on his hands. By all accounts, she appears to be a violent abuser herself, and due before the court. I have very little sympathy for her, and her family.

No one has suggested he is a paedophile. So your comment is more than a little weird.

You realise that sexual abuse and trafficking as a young adult often has lifelong mental health problems. She also had to deal with the world's media and people pulling her shreds on social media as a result of Prince Andrew actions. She wouldn't have been made inadvertently famous had it not been for his involvement.

You'll get a lot of Royal apologists on this thread. The Royals can do no wrong in many minds. I completely agree with you, had he been a meer mortal he'd have faced the wrath of the public. This is just shoved under the carpet. Now had he ever dared to leave the Royal family he would be absolutely hated and vindicated(as Harry)

And you know that exactly how?

I think she topped herself because she exposed herself for the liar she is with the being dead in four days lie! She was obviously a deeply disturbed woman with lots of issues and anyone who believes 100% everything she said is more than a little bit naive and stupid.

Honestly, the need for people to constantly bring Andrew into this is tedious.

There is no doubt that Andrew is a sleaze but VG had a far more complicated life than that, some of which was of her own making.

She was estranged from her children and by all accounts had a restraining order against her.

I’m sure that far more is going to come out about her in the media over the coming days/weeks and not all of it is going to be pleasant reading.

But hey she wasn’t responsible for any of the wrongs in her life because “Andrew”.

I read she was trafficked from Mar a Lago where she was working as a waitress for Trump. They are all involved.

@m00rfarm

See savory’s post above and educate yourself a little