Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - you have blood on your hands

[Muffinmam]

Am I being unreasonable to say that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - the Duke of York and member of the Royal Family has blood on his hands following the tragic suicide of Virginia Giuffre?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has faced zero consequences for his role in Virginia Giuffre‘s sexual abuse and trafficking because he’s rich and his powerful mummy paid off the victim and the British police failed to pursue charges against him. To be clear, while the age of consent in the UK is 17 years old this does not apply to trafficking victims and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has never faced criminal charges.

He probably thinks he’s got away with it now she’s gone.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14649791/Virginia-Giuffre-suicide-perth-mansion.html

@Iudncuewbccgrcb
Your post is incorrect

Andrew was in full regalia at Charles’ coronation . The complete velvet curtains nonsense

He has NOT lost his home - that is suggested every so often in the tabloids to keep the stupid believing that Andrew is in trouble with the Windsors . He isn’t . He has not lost his home and Charles pays for his security

William had Andrew in the front seat driving him somewhere- photographed doing so . Kate in the back
The Windsors see nothing wrong with what he did . They have a history of protecting pedophiles

I didn’t realise that she had ended her life, she was clearly a very troubled woman and had struggled for many years. Her poor family must be devastated.

Maybe they’re the ones that need the support right now rather than the lizard / leeches / royals

he is not a paedophile

lol

she may have been a troubled woman but she did manage to fight back - it is sad, but the op is ott imo,

Yes. It was a cry for help.

I live in Perth and the health system isn’t equipped to deal with people who are suicidal. So often people end their lives - often in very public ways. I was metres from a person who ended their life when I went out with friends a couple of years ago. The trains are often stopped because someone has jumped onto the tracks.

There just isn’t the help here. There is nowhere for these people to go and get help.

There just isn’t the help here. There is nowhere for these people to go and get help.

that's interesting

You can say what you like doesn't make it true, i do wonder if he can sue for slander though

And no i am not in one camp or the other i just don't see how these grand dramatic statements help the family of someone who has just died nor makes a difference excpent makes me think people have their own issues going on

Which Windsor pedophile are you referring to

Tbf to the other poster, she was just pointing out that you're wrong about the age of consent in the UK that you put in your opening post.

It's not fair to be defensive and act like @Lifestooshort71 was saying that there was an age of consent for sex trafficking when clearly that wasn't what she meant.

And you then go on to say that

She was under the age of 18 and was sex trafficked so it was a crime.

Which is wrong because, as you say, sex trafficking is a crime against anyone of any age.

Someone picking you up on an error in your post doesn't mean that they are defending him or disagree with the gist of your position.

He hasn't lost anything. Wasn't he front and centre when the Royals did their Easter church appearance this year? His mum stumped up millions to make the case go away. Which of course is perfectly normal...

Thank you for saying this. The Windsor’s have a history of protecting known pedophiles. Pedo Andrew is no different.

It’s always the same things people say “the age of consent is 16” (no, not for sex trafficking victims it isn’t) and “he lost everything” (he lost nothing - he still has his house, his title, his security and he’s present and family functions in his full dress).

I swear, the Firm must be paying for people to spread disinformation.

What…on Mumsnet?

How do you know?

I’m sorry but you cannot blame him for this sad turn of events.

She obviously had a mental health issues and was exploited in her younger years - and my understanding is she had an order against her stopping her seeing her children due to violence. You can’t pin all of that on Andrew.

Very sad for her and her family.

your quote

All of this.

What evidence do you have that he is a paedophile?

It is disinformation to say Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor committed no crime because the age of consent is 16 when it’s not 16 at all when the person is being trafficked for sex. It was a crime. He never faced charges for that crime.

It takes one person to spread misinformation and then a hundred people with low IQ’s repeat it thinking it’s true because they read it somewhere. That’s how disinformation works.

its very sad as she was also a mother her poor children. I really hope she wasn’t “pushed” into this

You're the one stating that he isn't. I'm just asking how you know. So what you're saying is, there's no proof/evidence that he is. Got it. Thanks.

It’s very sad for her family that she was broken before she even had a chance to grow up.

what would the Pope say

100%

I’m a different poster replying to you FYI, not the original.

As with everyone, if there’s no evidence to suggest that, why would you make that assumption?

This lady was 17 when she met Andrew.