Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not want to date men who earn less than me, even if they’re kind?

402 replies

RealPlumEagle · 10/04/2025 14:01

I’ve worked hard for a certain lifestyle and I don’t want to feel like I have to downgrade. It’s not about love, it’s about compatibility. AIBU or does that make me a snob?

OP posts:
JHound · 10/04/2025 19:47

JontyGentoo · 10/04/2025 19:18

Well yes but she did meet a man that was attractive, was nice but he wasn’t a high earner so it didn’t go very far. Obviously there has to be some attraction when you meet someone but if they are nice, have a good sense of humour, easy to get on with and there is a spark I wouldn’t say I would give them the heave ho just because he wasn’t a high wage earner. She wanted a high earner so she could be a SAHM and knew she couldn’t do that with someone on a lower wage. I just think she was just too rigid in her wants and she didn’t end up with the man/life she hoped she would have.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to be a SAHM but I see you meant she wanted a high earner. I thought you just meant a decent job which isn’t that demanding!

But honestly as some who was less selective always “gave men a chance ” if we got on, there was a spark and I found them attractive - terrible idea!

I guess either way your cousin would not have had the life she wanted - at least her way she attempted to getting what she wanted instead of immediately settling for what she did not want.

JHound · 10/04/2025 19:49

Loloj · 10/04/2025 19:28

I didn’t say that though did I?

My point was that I wouldn’t choose a partner purely based on them earning more than me and that my preference would be a kind and loving man any day over someone who earned more than me. Not that any man who earns a high salary will definitely be a dick head.

Edited

OP has not said she would choose a man purely based on him earning more though. I don’t know why people keep pretending that she has said that.

JHound · 10/04/2025 19:52

Iamthequeenoftheworld · 10/04/2025 19:20

men are more likely to leave than a woman if his partner gets sick and also men with money trade in loyal wives who been with them since they had 0 for a younger prettier girl all the time

so many left with no career, career growth etc because they were sahms (and unmarried ones too omg) while partner worked on career and pension etc after separation

but how dare a woman want her financial equal

you’d never see men defend the woman like this on male forums or be on the woman’s side/call him out for being unfair like this etc

ignore these pick mes

Edited

Your last sentence is fascinating to me for how true it is.

Women will berate other women for preferences that exclude certain men.

But you never see men battling and berating other men for excluding certain groups of women from their dating pool.

It’s odd and I wonder why women do this.

BeCleverViewer · 10/04/2025 19:54

Shirkingly · 10/04/2025 16:34

Why is it sad? I’m from a poor WC background, went to Oxford and so ended up mixing with and dating people from entirely different social class backgrounds. Let me tell you, there is a lot to be said for being in a relationship with someone to whom you don’t have to explain that binmen are people, too, and one of them is your dad, or that no, you don’t have a bedroom at home any more because two of your sisters moved into, so I was on the sofa when I visited in the vac, which was why I’d chosen a college that was able to accommodate me all year, not just in term-time. Or whose mother doesn’t congratulate you on not eating with your hands after a dinner party.

I mean, it’s not my job to educate people about my origins by dating them.

Same background diffrent experience. I enjoyed meeting other people and have not met a complete gormless dickhead who's rude to trades people. But yeah I can see if that was your experience why you think that way.

NoSoupForU · 10/04/2025 19:56

It's absolutely fine to have whatever likes and wants you desire.

I wouldn't like to be with someone with a big disparity in earnings either side of mine. I like doing and having nice things and wouldn't want to compromise on that. Equally, I wouldn't want somebody else to feel they have to compromise either.

justasking111 · 10/04/2025 20:02

@RealPlumEagle

Are you planning on having children?

BeCleverViewer · 10/04/2025 20:03

gannett · 10/04/2025 17:35

You get to hold out for whatever red lines you decide on and you don't need our permission.

I'm not going to warn you about all the good guys you might be saying no to. But good luck with the kind of guy who'll willingly choose a woman like you as his life partner! I wouldn't touch that guy with a bargepole.

This level of rudeness is bizzare. Its really really common for people to consider the finacial circumstances of their partner before committing. Does not make op bad or undesirable. Why have you and others reacted so poorly. In this world in real life people largely marry their finacial equals. People really do not typically deviate from that.

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 20:06

Loloj · 10/04/2025 19:28

I didn’t say that though did I?

My point was that I wouldn’t choose a partner purely based on them earning more than me and that my preference would be a kind and loving man any day over someone who earned more than me. Not that any man who earns a high salary will definitely be a dick head.

Edited

Neither did OP. She didn’t even say she wanted someone that earned more than her, but someone on an equal financial footing. Really not that wild a concept.

My point is there are more than two options out there.

JMSA · 10/04/2025 20:27

Hmm, I know what you mean. I’ve yet to meet a guy whose place is nicer than mine. Once, I went to a date’s house and he had plastic garden furniture as living room furniture.
Sorry, just no.

Loloj · 10/04/2025 20:36

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 20:06

Neither did OP. She didn’t even say she wanted someone that earned more than her, but someone on an equal financial footing. Really not that wild a concept.

My point is there are more than two options out there.

Erm the title of the thread is “To not want to date men who earn less than me, even if they are kind?”

So she wants to be with a man who earns at the very least the same as her.

I didn’t even say that I disagreed or suggested it was a “wild” concept. I just gave my experience and you’re twisting my words.

KidsDr · 10/04/2025 20:43

My husband doesn't earn as much as me (at this point in our lives) but his contribution towards my career, particularly in terms of flexibility re childcare is absolutely invaluable.

Silvertulips · 10/04/2025 20:44

but I do look for indicators of drive, direction and ambition

Absolutely! I have daughters and have told them to aim high. Nothing wrong in that!

No point wasting your time on lazy men who will add nothing to your life.

If every woman had the same ambition, men would have to step up.

How many posters do we see where husbands are comfortable in their role and don’t want to progress and take some of the strain.

BCBird · 10/04/2025 20:47

I think if here is a massive disparity in earnings it can cause issues when dating. I've been in this situation. It becomes annoying if u end up paying for most things. If money is pooled when living together or married, maybe it's different

steff13 · 10/04/2025 20:48

StrangerThings1 · 10/04/2025 15:41

She was in mid thirties , she had opened up her options at this stage because she had to if she wanted to have children which led to her meeting Steve, with whom she fell in love with

But Miranda didn't want children. She almost terminated her pregnancy with Brady because she wasn't in a place in life to have a kid. She and Steve had already broken up at that time.

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 20:57

Loloj · 10/04/2025 20:36

Erm the title of the thread is “To not want to date men who earn less than me, even if they are kind?”

So she wants to be with a man who earns at the very least the same as her.

I didn’t even say that I disagreed or suggested it was a “wild” concept. I just gave my experience and you’re twisting my words.

Edited

Which isn’t the same thing as choosing someone unkind, or choosing someone only on the basis of them being wealthier than her.

Kindness isn’t enough by itself, any more than wealth is.

Loloj · 10/04/2025 21:12

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 20:57

Which isn’t the same thing as choosing someone unkind, or choosing someone only on the basis of them being wealthier than her.

Kindness isn’t enough by itself, any more than wealth is.

I didn’t say it was the same thing.

Yes of course there are more than 2 options.

My point was simple - that I would not rule a partner out purely because they earned less than me. The example I gave was just an example - not black and white suggesting that these are the only two options.

Moopsie · 10/04/2025 21:17

As a fellow usually higher earner in a relationship situation, you are not unreasonable for myriad reasons.

It’s caused so many issues in my relationships. Either feelings of emasculation and insecurity on their part, feeling taken advantage of on my part, or having to ‘downgrade’ the standard of living/holidays etc that I’ve slogged for 20 years to get to accommodate other budgets.

Minor differences can be worked through, but a big gap is definitely problematic.

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 21:35

BeCleverViewer · 10/04/2025 20:03

This level of rudeness is bizzare. Its really really common for people to consider the finacial circumstances of their partner before committing. Does not make op bad or undesirable. Why have you and others reacted so poorly. In this world in real life people largely marry their finacial equals. People really do not typically deviate from that.

Hit dogs will holler.

Tbf this is mumsnet, where a woman will be told her standards are too high and she’s destined to die bitter and alone if she insists on limiting herself to only men that have teeth.

Yes, unless you’re willing to live in a cardboard box with three-teeth-Keith, sustained only by the power of love, you’re basically fucked.

BeCleverViewer · 10/04/2025 22:23

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 21:35

Hit dogs will holler.

Tbf this is mumsnet, where a woman will be told her standards are too high and she’s destined to die bitter and alone if she insists on limiting herself to only men that have teeth.

Yes, unless you’re willing to live in a cardboard box with three-teeth-Keith, sustained only by the power of love, you’re basically fucked.

You killed me I'm dying wheres your teeth Keith.

Crushed23 · 10/04/2025 22:36

StrangerThings1 · 10/04/2025 15:20

I was asking because most high earning career think like you in their 20/early 30, ( it’s very common) then by mid thirties, still haven’t met their perfect high earning mate and the chances of them doing this are getting rapidly slimmer and slimmer as every year goes by until they must either make a decision ( if they want children) to (a) lower their expectations / list of criteria and open themselves up to meeting men who earn less than them but at this stage a lot of the lower earning good catch men are now gone and looks are dwaning (b) keep pursuing the high earning men who are at this stage looking for women who are younger than them

Beware that this mindset is quite common but doesn’t always work out well for women

Example: Miranda and Steve in Sex and the City, Miranda was a high earning Lawyer n mid thirties, still single in mid 30s and wanted children, wasn’t getting the high earning men she wanted so ended up with a Barman (not dissing bar men) as she couldn’t hold out any longer and wait for the high earning man as if she did that she would possibly have lost the ability to have children

As I said there are risks to having this mindset and I know women who are single and childless because of it

That’s not the story of Miranda and Steve at all though. She broke up with him because they were incompatible at the time (he was a big kid). Then she fell pregnant accidentally and initially didn’t want to keep the baby because it wasn’t in her life plan to have a baby at that point (she was 35/36 I think? It was season 4 anyway). She decided to keep the baby, then nearly two years later, on the baby’s first birthday, her and Steve got back together. By that point he was running his own business coz he opened up a bar with Aidan, plus they had a lot of history and a baby together.

I don’t disagree that women adjust their standards as they get older (I certainly have), but it’s rarely to the extreme of the (incorrect) example you gave of a law partner choosing a random bar man to settle down with.

TunnocksOrDeath · 10/04/2025 23:01

I think for most people a relationship works best if you have similar values, educational attainment, attitudes to work-life balance, preferences re spend-versus-save, shared expectations re home and lifestyle, similar attitudes to risk, and so on.
I'd be really surprised if people who were aligned in all of those areas were not in the same earnings bracket, unless life has thrown one of them a very weird curveball, because how much you end up earning is frequently dependent on behaviours which are driven by those things.

TheHerboriste · 10/04/2025 23:04

Silvertulips · 10/04/2025 20:44

but I do look for indicators of drive, direction and ambition

Absolutely! I have daughters and have told them to aim high. Nothing wrong in that!

No point wasting your time on lazy men who will add nothing to your life.

If every woman had the same ambition, men would have to step up.

How many posters do we see where husbands are comfortable in their role and don’t want to progress and take some of the strain.

Exactly. If women would raise their standards, men would have to.

As it is, no matter how lowdown, lazy, horrible and useless a man is, there is always some woman who will stoop to service him, provide sex, bear his children and financially prop him up. One really despairs.

So many here calling it “shallow” to have high standards certainly explains a lot.

TheHerboriste · 10/04/2025 23:04

Silvertulips · 10/04/2025 20:44

but I do look for indicators of drive, direction and ambition

Absolutely! I have daughters and have told them to aim high. Nothing wrong in that!

No point wasting your time on lazy men who will add nothing to your life.

If every woman had the same ambition, men would have to step up.

How many posters do we see where husbands are comfortable in their role and don’t want to progress and take some of the strain.

Exactly. If women would raise their standards, men would have to.

As it is, no matter how lowdown, lazy, horrible and useless a man is, there is always some woman who will stoop to service him, provide sex, bear his children and financially prop him up. One really despairs.

So many here calling it “shallow” to have high standards certainly explains a lot.

durchwaffles · 10/04/2025 23:12

durchwaffles · 10/04/2025 15:25

So, everyone who is calling the Op shallow etc - did you or your partner not have any standards/requirements regarding looks /figure/heights when dating?

And even if not do you judge the many people who do have those requirements, the same way as you judge the OP for having income requirements?

Would you say “oh you shouldn’t care if she/he’s unattractive to you , as long as she/he’s kind or else that means you’re superficial?

what I find interesting is most men (at least men of a similar age to Op) by and large loudly and proudly go for women they find attractive. Their fellow men are not telling them to not to be shallow, and disregard how pretty or not they find the woman or how attracted they are to her body. Men will happily announce a woman’s beauty caught their eye.

But there’s all this hand wringing when a woman wants a man to be able to afford a similar lifestyle to her? I don’t understand it.

Edited

Came back to this thread wondering if anyone had answered this & don’t think they have. So much hypocrisy and misogyny on one thread.

It’s apparently ok for people - especially men - to have standards about how someone looks/their height/figure (some of these things people can’t even change or didn’t earn other than by genetic lottery ) but hey it’s @RealPlumEagle who is superficial for wanting someone she is equally matched with financially and is ambitious with similar aspirations and goals.

Re. The pps saying she will end up a single bitter cat lady you do understand that in 2025 some women are happier single than settling with someone who has what they see as an adverse impact on their lifestyle?

My old school friend married a guy who was very low earning and unambitious, 15 years on they have 2 kids, he still doesn’t earn much and she’s ran ragged with doing everything with the kids and working and rarely socialising .

Her sister of a similar age chose not to settle for that lifestyle and enjoys her single life of travelling, pursuing her hobbies and spending time with friends and family. Maybe she will find someone later but if not - there are worse things than ending up single!! Read the relationships board on here 😂

durchwaffles · 10/04/2025 23:17

InterIgnis · 10/04/2025 21:35

Hit dogs will holler.

Tbf this is mumsnet, where a woman will be told her standards are too high and she’s destined to die bitter and alone if she insists on limiting herself to only men that have teeth.

Yes, unless you’re willing to live in a cardboard box with three-teeth-Keith, sustained only by the power of love, you’re basically fucked.

Too funny 😂 but hey what did 3 teeth Keith ever do to you? He deserves to get some love in that cardboard box too 🤣and anyone who rejects him is clearly unreasonable and losing out!

Seriously though, as I’ve also said above - it’s funny how yet men can say they only go for say eg. a woman they find pretty, slim, who is at least a few years younger than them and and no-one - including women - will bat an eyelid.

Men certainly don’t tell each other to abandon their preferences or requirements and berate each other as superficial for having certain requirements regarding looks and weight. Or very rarely anyway.