Possibly more of a wwyd.
My husband has the opportunity for a new role at work. It would be at 0.8 but is a promotion so has a higher FTE. This essentially means his take home remains the same but obviously with it being a promotion is better for him career wise in the long term.
While the money would be the same he would also be working from home at least 2 days a week whereas he is currently 5 days a week in the office with the exception of certain times of year so we would save quite a lot on commuting costs.
I do not object to him taking this job in principle as it clearly logically makes sense but I am finding it hard not to feel resentful that he would get to work 4 days when I have always supported us financially as I make more money and up until 2 years ago he was studying and only working part time. Since he has been working full time I have felt like it is my turn to be a bit financially supported. I also feel resentful that because he is the lower earner and we don’t “need” is money as such, he has more freedom to make decisions like this where I don’t.
I’m thinking about saying to him that I am in support of him taking the role under the following terms:
- If an opportunity to go up to 5 days arises he takes it
- It does not become the “norm” for him to work 4 days a week with me working full time because I am the breadwinner and that future roles should be full time.
- He attempts to find additional paid work on the 5th day (this might be casual)
- If he is not working full time he picks up a significant extra chunk of domestic load.
Is this reasonable? It doesn’t feel reasonable to make DH stay in a lesser role commuting 5 days a week just for the sake of him working full time but I also feel like I should get some benefit if this is going to be the arrangement. We don’t have children yet.