Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

3 ‘baby mums’…. Instant red flag??

354 replies

Lilysienna1 · 13/05/2024 20:23

As the title says…. Would you continue talking with a man you’ve met (in person) if he told you he has 5 children with 3 women? (Youngest is a one year old, oldest is 16.)

From what he has said, the relationship he has with the mothers of his children is amicable, and he has all 5 of them (3 with 1 mum, then one each with the other 2) every other weekend and pays child support for all 5.

Bearing in mind, I have 3 children with my ex, so I feel like a hypocrite for even wondering if there is something just a bit off… that with 3 women things didn’t work out, that he has had the last 2 children fairly early into each relationship and that the youngest is only 1, and that relationship ended 6 months ago…. Red flag or second date…

OP posts:
NonPlayerCharacter · 14/05/2024 12:18

Three kids with one partner is nothing like three kids with three partners.

MagnetCarHair · 14/05/2024 12:25

Thegoodbadandugly · 14/05/2024 11:27

If this was a woman would you all still be of the same opinion?

Yes.

Willyoujustbequiet · 14/05/2024 12:25

Beekeepingmum · 14/05/2024 11:37

Why do so many women think a man simply seeing his kids is a positive - surely it is the bare minimum.

Indeed. Still being in contact with the children you created and who you are legally responsible for is not something to be applauded.

Raise the bloody bar.

Tamigotxh · 14/05/2024 12:28

Willyoujustbequiet · 14/05/2024 12:25

Indeed. Still being in contact with the children you created and who you are legally responsible for is not something to be applauded.

Raise the bloody bar.

And to add to that in many cases the fathers contribution to the financial support of the first children is heavily subsided by the mother and/or taxpayer.

That’s why these men can “afford” to go and have more kids.

bonzaitree · 14/05/2024 12:30

Think about it this way.

Three separate women gave birth to his child. And now he is single.

There are two possible options:

1 He made the conscious choice to leave his child and partner when his kid was young and the woman was at a vulnerable point in her life.

OR

2 He was such a shit father and partner that the women decided that their lives would be better and easier living as single mothers rather than staying with him.

And that happened three separate times with three separate women.

That says something very very strong about him.

OneHeartySnail · 14/05/2024 12:31

Not when is as recent as having a one year old!

Maybe if they were teens and young adults and he had managed at least a decade without reproducing, and showed signs of having learnt and grown up.

savethatkitty · 14/05/2024 12:33

Hard pass.

Naunet · 14/05/2024 12:38

Thegoodbadandugly · 14/05/2024 11:27

If this was a woman would you all still be of the same opinion?

Could you not even manage to read the thread and see that this has already been answered before the need to put your cape on and come police us all on behalf of the men, struck you? Why on reading the OP, was your thought “but what about a hypothetical woman who did the same thing?”

catchthebeat · 14/05/2024 12:45

I'm just imagining the potential for drama with so many different sets of children, yours included.

Abeona · 14/05/2024 12:45

If this was a woman would you all still be of the same opinion?

Absolutely. I'm a lesbian, I'd be running as fast as I could.

2024istheyearforme · 14/05/2024 12:48

no thank you

ThirtyThrillionThreeTrees · 14/05/2024 12:52

It's not such much the 3 different exes/children. In certain circumstances, I coukd see how it may happen etc. I know of a few cases - ranging from relatively normal to insane chaos.

It's the speed at which he has children so early in relationships and the fact the youngest is only one, that would really put me off.

StormingNorman · 14/05/2024 12:55

Missimperfection · 14/05/2024 08:57

You need to delete this comment calling people "stupid",is Ableism which is offensive to the disabled people.

‘Stupid’ is only ableism if you’re stupid enough to think disabled are stupid.

CharlotteRumpling · 14/05/2024 13:08

I think even putting aside any moral judgement, it is ok to decline great men with complicated lives if you want a simpler life.

WoshPank · 14/05/2024 13:13

CharlotteRumpling · 14/05/2024 13:08

I think even putting aside any moral judgement, it is ok to decline great men with complicated lives if you want a simpler life.

This.

If you wanted a relationship with any involvement in each other's lives, the logistics would be such a faff. They wouldn't become less of a faff even if one felt he'd behaved impeccably at every point.

tuvamoodyson · 14/05/2024 13:15

Not if his arse was studded with diamonds!! I’d say the same if it was a woman too…

MalcolmTuckersSwearBox · 14/05/2024 13:15

Throw this fish back, you deserve better

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 14/05/2024 13:27

Tamigotxh · 14/05/2024 11:41

@Greeneyegirl

It’s not hate, it’s just that we
are allowed to have our standards and preferences when dating. I’d happily sit down and have a drink with someone like that, or even employ them but I’m not having them in my life romantically or sharing a house/raising kids together and that’s OK.

It’s not a work opportunity or something where everyone needs to get an equal chance.

One of the best predictors of future behaviour is past behaviour so on that basis no I wouldn’t encourage any one I knew to date someone who has children by 3 different people. It also shows they think very differently about procreating and establishing families from me so we’d have conflicting values and principles. Each to their own though.

Edited

This is one of the most mature things I've heard.

You do you. But I don't have to accept it into my own bubble.

maddiemookins16mum · 14/05/2024 13:41

Run Forrest Run.

MrsSunshine2b · 14/05/2024 13:41

I wouldn't, not because he's a red flag, but because you are looking at having your life revolve around 3 other women and 5 other kids for the next 18 years, plus having to provide a home for 8 kids in total whilst 20% of your OHs income leaves the household every month.

Acornsoup · 14/05/2024 13:48

Even if he was the best Dad in the world and perfectly lovely it would be a no from me.

His kids should be a priority.

Good Dads have their own kids more than once every other week.

I don't want a side part in my life story.

A 4 bed with a through lounge is not big enough for this side show.

I don't want to drive a minibus.

There must be other options. Throw him back.

Yes he's obviously talented at being 'lovely' but has he got capacity for a relationship longer than 18 months?

🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

JuiceBoxJuggler · 14/05/2024 14:02

Run.

HedgehogB · 14/05/2024 14:16

Difficult. Stacey Solomon is wonderful, I love her, yet she has five kids with three different fathers. Would anyone say these things about her if she split from her husband? Unlikely. However - still a red flag for me .

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 14/05/2024 14:21

HedgehogB · 14/05/2024 14:16

Difficult. Stacey Solomon is wonderful, I love her, yet she has five kids with three different fathers. Would anyone say these things about her if she split from her husband? Unlikely. However - still a red flag for me .

I still wouldn't want to get into a relationship with someone who had 5 kids and 3 exes to consider, regardless of how wonderful they are

OhmygodDont · 14/05/2024 14:21

HedgehogB · 14/05/2024 14:16

Difficult. Stacey Solomon is wonderful, I love her, yet she has five kids with three different fathers. Would anyone say these things about her if she split from her husband? Unlikely. However - still a red flag for me .

Yeah. She would have made poor choices repeatedly, bought in multiple men and added additional siblings to the mix.

It’s thinking with her heart not her head for herself not her children.