Can't help thinking King Charles is selfish

[Eieiom]

Standing back, looking at the Harry situation, I can't help thinking that Charles is the root of all the family toxicity.

He had an affair while married to Diana, which led to their divorce and much unhappiness on her side. After her early death, his children were obviously in a lot of pain. The remote parenting style of the RF probably did little to soften this.
He's managed to marry his affair partner and now he's cutting off one of his sons.
Harry just looks like a really hurt person acting out to me. In most families, they would just be tolerated and forgiven.
I think the RF look very cold.

That's called being selective.
Two pictures with a biased comment proves absolutely nothing.

There's lots of examples in the article.
I'm less interested in gossip as you appear to be- I'm more interested in their parasitic relationship with the UK taxpayer ie why do. our taxes pay for one lazy and rather unpleasant family to live in complete luxury not even working.

Oh it's from Bored Panda! I thought maybe BuzzFeed. I knew it was something with just bitesized snippets.
No in depth reporting there, @pleasehelpwi3 !

No need for in depth reporting, just compare the headlines!

My favorite anti Meghan headline is the one they suggested she was trying to poison Charlotte with her wedding bouquet!!!!🤣

No, I don't just look at headlines. I like to read the article. So many negative headlines about Charles, Camilla, William and Kate, then I read the article and find that the details are lacking, and they contain no substantive evidence.
That's just like a social media meme, isn't it?
I don't think I'd rely on "Bored Panda" as a news outlet, thank you.

Was that your favourite? Not as entertaining as the recent jam ones, although possibly funnier!

No. He might be selfish and I kind of agree about the affair partner.

But Harry and Meghan have been outrageously disloyal. No-one could work around that.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13350497/Jams-Meghan-Markle-sell-hilariously-jam-basket-duchess.html
This is quite amusing, @CurlewKate : trigger warning - Daily Mail! Funny picture, though.

Forced to marry a virgin etc etc .......
That may be true but thereafter he could have chosen to act with compassion and integrity. Diana was the only one who didn't know what was going on ....add to that , she was barely 19 ! C was a mature man having grown up amongst the rules of 'the firm'
Diana was supposed to have been told by the Queen Morher to expect a Prince of Wales to have a mistress , it was just something that always happened and I firmly believe C was told this before he married.

He may have been doing his 'duty' or however they convince themselves that behaviour like this is OK but again, Diana was a teenager and she knew nothing.
Absolutely horrible with no justification then or now.
I am totally sick of them all , they should go !!!!

Diana was 19 when engaged, 20 when married.

There’s literally no evidence she is friends with him

Unless @derxa is Camilla - so what

No you don’t

On that thread someone corrected you that Andrew is not in fact a pedophile. There is k evidence he is but he almost certainly had sex with trafficked of-age girls. But that’s not the same as pedophilia

Thats not defending him that’s just making a correction

Oh FGS.
Youre being silly now

Imagine claiming awareness raising achieves nothing

About something as crucial as VAWG.
I despair.
People may not like Camilla, but slagging that really is the pits.

I find it so weird that people think they can actually make any a judgement. You’ve no idea what happens behind closed doors. None.

Look at the way Charles mother treated him. She was cold and indifferent. He should have been king 19 years ago. Charles is just carrying on the pattern.

The UK tabloids started raising racist commentary and the situation with Meghan's dad. The RF could have exerted some pressure.

No.
It's not the role of the Head of State or his family to interfere with a free press.

19 years is a weirdly specific number. In fact saying someone should have been dead for 19 years is an odd concept.

Yes indeed. Most peculiar.

Charles who did his own book on his parents and called his dad to account director gordunstsn publicly (but as future king he could)
Charles who conducted public widely broadcast interviews about the most intimate family life whilst his young sons where at boarding school?

Yes he's a selfish naval gazing man. I still like him but as a dad... Nil point.

Here's a much more detailed article from the Guardian with some analysis about the press treatment of Meghan and Kate for you.

https://www.theguardian.com/global/2020/jan/18/meghan-gets-more-than-twice-as-many-negative-headlines-as-positive

No thanks.
I don't think that the Guardian is a reliable source either. They have a very strong editorial bias, and their writers are no longer of a high calibre. Shame. It used to be a decent paper.
They've fallen into the trap of thinking that by supporting H&M they're being republican - they're not. They're just supporting a worse form of royalty. Not very well argued at all, and somewhat naive
Plus - they need to improve proof reading!

I confess I only read the report on it but didn’t he lose his job after that?