It's amazing how utterly enraged and furious some
men people get when men are denied access to children. They really do think having access to whatever they want is their birthright, don't they?
No mother with a single ounce of common sense would let some random strange man who approached them in a park just take their toddler off unsupervised.
To be suspicious of every male and view them as a potential predator is not called safeguarding, it's just sick.
No, letting your toddler go off unsupervised with every random Tom, Dick or Harry who approaches you in public is sick.
It doesn't mean that every busybody in the street should accuse perfectly normal teenage boys of being a potential molester.
Interesting use of language there.
Mothers making choices for their own toddlers = INTERFERRING BUSYBODIES. (Is it really possible to "interfere" over your own baby??)
Politely saying no to a strange man wanting unsupervised access to a strange child - ACCUSING THEM!!!!
Total stranger = perfectly normal teenage boy.
The fact is you have absolutely no idea who this man is or whether he is "normal" or not. Yes, statistically he probably is normal. But there's simply no way to tell. Because he is a total stranger.
It's remarkable how anonymous Internet posters who have never even laid eyes on this guy, who don't know him from Adam, who only know he exists from reading a message board, have automatically assumed thinks about his character and personality purely because he is a man.
Anyone With A Penis = Good, Mother=Bad. Thanks for clarifying!