@justcly as with all crime the intent has to be proven and a child of 10 would have to be a rather special case to have to have had the sexual intent required for the elements of sexual assault or harassment every one is banging on about.
And any adult that compares a 10 year old boy acting on what is more than likely (statistically) given that at this age sexual proclivities are no where near formed, especially in boys - to an adult male performing a sexual assault or sexual harassment - needs their lumps feeling!!
You can't on one hand say a child of ten understands sexual drive enough to commit a sexual assault or sexual harassment and then on the other say a child of 10 isn't old enough to make fully informed decisions around consent to sexual activity.. at 10 they either understand sex enough or they don't .. it doesn't matter what side of this situation your sat on!
The derogatory terminology used towards this child is so much more likely To crest a situation around sex for him as an adult than a few mistaken attempts at a prank that it would seem has been dealt with.
At the end of the day the OP herself doesn't even know the details of how the child was dealt with, and rightly so - that's between him, his carers and school .. so a group of adult strangers speculating like this is some juicy game of cluedo is quite frank distasteful and a bit weird ..
OP if I posted this after one of my kids had be 'pantsed' at school I can say without a doubt all three of my boys would far angrier with me for sharing it with utter strangers than the classmate who acted stupidly .. it's one thing to air your own dirty mess in public forums but our
Kids deserve a level of privacy just completely negated here