Thanks for the reply @MarielVanArkleStinks. I totally agree with you that those (impressively researched and compelling) stats show conclusively that male on female domestic violence is more widespread and often has more pronounced harmful outcomes than frmale on male domestic violence. No argument from me at all, and I hope it goes without saying that the perpetrators of those offences are vile creatures, who need to have the book thrown at them. So, I agree with you that domestic violence disproportionately impacts women (while also significantly impacting men), and I agree with your conclusion that it makes sense to listen to your own protective instincts when you meet someone. That's true for everyone.
The issue I had was with your conclusion that it's right to treat men with suspicion, by virtue of them being men. I'll explain why.
First, let me illustrate it with some data from the US crime system, which shows that black Americans account for 13% of the population, but are responsible for 52% of homicides.
www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-black-americans-commit-crime
That's hugely disproportionate, and there are all sorts of possible explanations for it, which are considered in the link. Using your logic, Americans should therefore treat black people with suspicion, as the stats say that they disproportionately commit more of the most serious crimes. I hope you'd agree with me that would be a conpletely inappropriate and unacceptable conclusion to draw from that information. But it's the same analysis that leads you to conclude that men should be treated with suspicion when it comes to violent crime in the UK.
It's a common leap to make - there are plenty on here also concluding that everyone with a shared characteristic (in this case, men - but it could be race, religion, wearing a blue sweater etc) should be treated with suspicion because of the actions of some people with that characteristic.
Society's view of violent crime (particularly domestic violence) leads to an exclusive approach, that causes male victims to feel they simply don't matter. Even the govermment's strategy for tackling domestic violence is called "Ending violence against women and girls". Now, that's a laudable aim - and one we can all get behind. But it leads the 1 in 3 victims who are men to feel that our experience somehow doesn't matter - it invalidates what we've been through, and causes us to feel that we are the victims nobody cares about.
We then encounter attitudes across society saying that - in your words - it's right to view men with suspicion as potential perpetrators of violence. Now, we've not only been invalidated as survivors of domestic violence, but we're being told that we should be suspected of the very offences that have been committed against us. I hope you can understand how that is experienced by a man who has lived through abuse.
So, I agree that male on female violence is more widespread and often more serious than the reverse. It needs to be taken seriously. But my problem is with people who conclude that, because of the actions of a minority of men, all men should be treated with suspicion. That, for someone like me, is a conclusion that just feels as though society is weighing in with my abusive ex purely because I am a man.