"No one was mocking or racist towards her. "
Except people mock her all the time. She's "stuipd, useless, thick"
"A spectacularly unintelligent woman."
Except that she has a degree from Cambridge and has been a successful public servant for 35 years.
No one aims the same "stupid, thick, useless" comments at other politicians in the same way.
Boris quotes incorrect figures, but it gets laughed off, and the vitriol is no where near the same.
Hammond, Grieve and Gove made very similar errors over figures in the same election campaign, where is their vilification?
Jacob Rees Mogg went on Andrew Marr and made statements that show that he totally doesn't understand how the WTO works, buyt no one uses these terms about him. Farage did something similar with Andrew Neil.
The ERG published an entire document that discussed something that doesn't exist a "World Trade Deal", and in this document used citations, which only cited other documents written by the organisation its self ( none of which contained any actual data) the one document from the Bank of England that they did quote, they did so erroneously. They launched this travesty to much fanfare, whilst essentially saying "All economists are idiots, except for this one that says what we want" . An utter act of intellectual credulity.
Ian Duncan Smith lied about his qualifications and has a history of getting things wrong too.
But no one vilifies them, and no one uses terms that have in the past been used to justify discrimination to black people.
So yes, racist.