WarPigeon
I never said my knowledge of the EU "covers everything". I'm willing to bet it is a lot more detailed than most people's knowledge of the EU though.
Regarding EU expansion, it's a good question. Perhaps the criteria for letting new member states join should be more stringent and more rigorously enforced. It's always been ambitious project, it hasn't been done before, and no, they haven't got everything right. I don't think the UK has been particularly negatively affected by EU expansion. Economically we have benefited from it. Politically it's a more difficult issue because some people have a perception that EU immigration has undercut their wages. I'm not sure that's really borne out by the available evidence, but it's worth noting that the UK government could have made more of an effort to control the flow of immigration from eastern Europe following the 2004 expansion and chose not to. There are checks and controls that they could have put in place at any time, which are permitted Under EU law. They chose not to do so.
As for future expansion, each member state has a right of veto. No one is joining unless everyone else agrees. Further expansion can't be forced on any country. And Turkey will most likely never join because they will never meet the criteria.
Regarding wider issues such as Russia and Yugoslavia, the EU is primarily supposed to be about trade. Yes, there is necessarily come political cross-over. But one thing I find curious is that some leavers say "we joined an economic union, we never agreed to a political union", and then the next minute they're trying to hold the EU accountable for its political action or inaction in third countries.
You can't have it both ways.
Nobody is pretending the EU is perfect but overall, we are much better in than out.
We were originally invited to join along with the original six but we turned up our noses and said, "eww, no thanks". We then looked on from the sidelines for the next decade as the economies of the original six member states went from strength to strength before swallowing our pride in about 1960 and asking if we could join after all.
The French blocked our entry for over a decade because they said we weren't team players and were only interested in the potential economic benefits.
Maybe they were right, and we should never have been allowed to join.