Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to say that DC should not go to their grandparents abroad for 2 weeks?

204 replies

LookingforRainbows · 16/07/2017 08:54

Hi all,

DD is 4, due to start school in September, and DS is 2. DH and I both work full time, and both dc go to day nursery.

We both have time off work the last week and a half of August, to take a family holiday together. I then have the first week of September off, and DH has a few days in the week of September off (to settle DD into school before she starts breakfast club/after-school club).

DH does however have a lot more flexibility with his work - he often holds meetings via skype and teleconference, and if planned and organised in advanced, he can spend periods working from home, not needing to go into the office for a couple of weeks, whereas I work public sector, and certainly don't have that degree of flexibility.

Anyway, last week DH was talking with his family (who live abroad in Europe) in his native language. I admit I certainly am not fluent in his language, although I do know a bit, and when they were talking, I gathered that they were talking about the children, but I wasn't able to understand much as they were talking very fast. Not that it mattered I thought, as I don't need to understand, it's their conversation and doesn't concern me.
Anyway, later that eve, DH told me that he was thinking about taking 2 weeks in August to work from home, and he could go to his home country, with DD and DS, and his parents could look after them while he worked, as this would be good for their learning of his native language which is coming on slow at the moment, which I agree with, (although this is because DH is always talking to them in English and 'forgets' to speak his native language, but that's a whole other issue for a whole other thread) also that it would be good for them to bond with his parents, who they do know, as his parents come over every year, and we also visited earlier this year, and we do Skype etc.

Anyway, I wasn't keen on this idea, as I don't want to be away from DC for 2 weeks, and even though DH will be with them, he will be working, so they will be full time with their grandparents who they don't know very well, (although I do accept they are not strangers). Aside from taking them to the park when they came to visit this year, my inlaws have never looked after DC alone before, and DS in particular can be quite clingy and unsettled, especially in unfamiliar places. Also, DD can get anxious and gets upset when she doesn't understand (but she internalises it rather than letting it out) and I worry that she might be some upset if she doesn't understand the language or feels that her grandparents don't understand her.

So I told DH that I didn't think it would be a good idea, and that I wasn't comfortable with it.

Roll forward to this weekend, DH is again trying to convince me to change my mind. Again I say the same things. DH is adamant it will be fine, and tells me that his parents have already been getting ready to have the children and have been making plans for all the things they will do when they have the children, and how they are really looking forward to having them etc etc. I was a bit annoyed, because it seemed as bough he had gone and made the plans with his parents, knowing that I had already said I wasn't happy with it.
He then said to me that I was being selfish as I would have no problem with them being with my parents for two weeks (not really the same as my parents live not too far away and see DC quite often and have cared for DC on their own a few times before) and that I am being selfish because I am blocking what will be good for the children, all because I don't want to be alone and have an empty house after work, and that it would be better than the children being at nursery. He even had said I was being controlling! But I think that he is the controlling one, making plans with his parents, knowing I had already said no.

DH is frosty with me his morning, but I really don't want to back down on this. I worry that as DD is starting school soon, I don't want to add to her anxiety, and yes I guess I am being protective, I know they will be with their dad and grandparents, but I just have a bad gut feeling about this. It's not an option for me to join them I'm afraid as I wouldn't get the time off work. And it's not an option for my inlaws to fly over at the moment either.

AIBU?

OP posts:
FrancisCrawford · 16/07/2017 13:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Seenoevil · 16/07/2017 13:33

Yabu! Let them go, there enjoy themselves and there Dad will be there!

ConstanceCraving · 16/07/2017 13:33

How old are the children OP?

HateSummer · 16/07/2017 13:38

Yabu. You do seem controlling. Let them go and have fun with their grandparents, they won't be around forever. Their dad will be with them, so I don't see the problem.

cafetea · 16/07/2017 13:55

It could be nice to let them visit their other country and family. You could have a relaxed time at home when you're not working. The condition on them going could be that your dh startes to speak more in Swedish to them. It would be good that you learn it as well even just to a basic level.

GreenRut · 16/07/2017 14:01

Yabu. It's their grandparents and they'll be with their father! In your position I would have been booking the tickets for them in case anyone changed their minds!

Nightshirt · 16/07/2017 14:01

yabu.

GreenRut · 16/07/2017 14:01
ConstanceCraving · 16/07/2017 14:06

Something does not add up with poster.

MummyMuppet2x2 · 16/07/2017 14:25

Personally I don't think there is one 'correct' answer. I can see both sides, but would veer in favour of the OP's DH. But....

My main issue is the way it's been presented to the OP. Her DH has made these arrangements with his parents without involving her in the decision-making process. Then, he presents her with all the ready-made plans, expecting her to fall in line. How can he be surprised that she isn't that keen? They are her kids!

Both parents should decide. Not one parent along with the GPs on their side. No matter how well intentioned.

This needs to go back a step in my opinion and allow the OP more day in the idea and the planning.

The opportunity and experience for the kids could be amazing, but both parents should be happy about the arrangements.

KatharinaRosalie · 16/07/2017 14:35

YABU. My kids are 2 and 4 and my parents live abroad. We would have some issues if DH decided I can't take them to see my parents.

Saiman · 16/07/2017 14:55

3 years ago the ops kids were older than they are now?

How does that work?

I get changing ages to protect privacy but both if those threads are very age relevant.

AdalindSchade · 16/07/2017 15:14

They won't just be with their grandparents though their dad will be there and working from home!

Natsku · 16/07/2017 15:16

Assuming they are 2 and 4 then I'd think two weeks is too long for a first visit and would compromise on one week or, finances permitting, going out there for the middle weekend (that would be best in my opinion). This is something that is really important for the children's language skills and getting to know their cultural heritage.

Plus as its Sweden I'd be doubly keen on it because its such a lovely, beautiful and child-friendly country.

I'm in your DH's position and if my OH said no to me taking the children to my home country to stay with my parents we wouldn't last long together (and actually DD's dad tried to say no, even refused to drive us to the airport after tickets had been paid for - his sister ended up driving us and I left him a month later, though not just for that but it was one of the last straws). Now I have sole custody I'll be sending DD, and eventually this next baby, over to my parents for a week or two each summer.

GhostsToMonsoon · 16/07/2017 15:41

If it's Sweden then I would imagine the GPs speak good English and it's also a very safe country.

I still think two weeks is too long for a 2yo to be away from their mother. This thread is very age-dependent so I hope OP will clarify ages of the children given the discrepancies with her previous threads.

Natsku · 16/07/2017 15:49

Even if the grandparents don't speak good English the children will quickly pick up enough Swedish for basic communication - its amazing how quickly very young children pick up other languages when fully immersed, and they will have at least heard it occasionally from their dad.

yikesanotherbooboo · 16/07/2017 16:47

I agree with YABU posters.
Your children deserve a relationship with their GPs and contact with their culture. Weeks spent immersed at a young age will help them to retain it.
I would have missed my children terribly if I had had to leave them at that age but as far as I can see it is a great option for them. They have each other, their Daddy and their GPs who I am sure adore them. Of course they will miss you but I still think you should let them go . I also think that not letting them travel with your DH is disrespectful , surely if the roles were reversed you would want to take this opportunity?
Be brave OP and make it happen in a positive manner.

Witchitywoo · 16/07/2017 16:58

"Anyway, I wasn't keen on this idea, as I don't want to be away from DC for 2 weeks......"

This speaks volumes in my eyes. YOU don't want to be away from the kids. It's not about you, surely? It's about the kids spending time with GPs, brushing up on their language and having fun. If the GPS are capable, trustworthy adults then let DC go.

PurplePeppers · 16/07/2017 17:53

I really really hope that the grand parents are NOT going to speak English with the dcs.
The whole point would be for them to learn Swedish. And the culture (the songs, the stories etc etc). You can't do that in English!

NorthernLurker · 16/07/2017 18:11

Sounds like the op has reduced the kids age to improve her argument. Pretty crap tactic.

Sparkletastic · 16/07/2017 18:16

YANBU your DCs don't sound like they'd enjoy being away from you for 2 weeks. How about 1 week and then in-laws return with DH and DCs for a week with you?

Saiman · 16/07/2017 18:20

sparkle which kids?

The 6 and 8 year old. Or the 2 and 4 year old. Or the only child she has who is a boy who is older?

It appears op changes ages and genders to suit her argument. Its impossible to say if the kids wouldnt be happy or not.

Sparkletastic · 16/07/2017 18:21

Oh right. Whatevs then.

KayTree87 · 16/07/2017 18:21

YANBU personally I think they are far to young to be away from you in a strange country for two weeks. I would put my foot down. No way would this be happening.

ConstanceCraving · 16/07/2017 18:26

OP was pregnant with a baby girl late 2015 too that she wanted to call Pauline. I wish the OP would come back and clarify things Confused