She's smoothly insincere. Difficult to like.
I was very disappointed at the shallowness of her campaign. I expected her to annihilate Trump in the debates with her far superior intellect and experience of how the political world works. I wanted her to ask him the really probing questions:
"How exactly are you going to build this wall? Tell us your plan on how you will fund it";
"How exactly do you propose to deport all illegal immigrants who, by definition, are currently living here illegally and presumably in hiding?";
"You say you won't get involved with wars abroad that don't concern the USA - and yet you say you will wipe out ISIS - how will you achieve both those things?"
"You're highly critical of the US military's strategy in Mosul, saying they gave the enemy far too much notice. How exactly would you mobilise thousands of troops and train the local army in secret? And tell us how you, who dodged the Vietnam draft, now seem to know how to launch an invasion better than our army generals with decades of experience?"
"You brushed off your 'Grab em by the Pussy' comments as 'Locker room talk'. Is this how you and your friends usually talk? Do you think that's OK?"
Instead - she spoke in the same, cheesy, repeated, hollow soundbites and catch phrases. Her campaign was almost as lacking in substance as his was. She doesn't lack the intelligence to challenge him, so I can only assume that this was a strategy worked out with her team to just repeat the same lines....
It didn't work, she just sounded insincere and there was no challenge, no exposing this ignoramus for what he was. She grossly miscalculated and underplayed her hand.