Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To resent my DIL a tiny bit?

457 replies

TessieMec · 11/07/2016 18:44

please be kind, I'm new here! Just after some advice. I'm 56 and have 2 adult sons (this concerns my eldest, who is 30). He married my DIL 3 years ago. Now I must say, she's a lovely girl. Kind, always polite and good fun to be around. She clearly dotes on my son for whom she does everything (I tell her to get him to do housework but she says she wants to and it's easier as she works from home and he commutes quite far to work). They are happy. This is good, obviously.

My husband (who is not sons dad but brought him up ever since we got together when son was 2) and I live about an hour and a half away. Son and DIL live 5 mins from her parents (she has never admitted to me that this is the real reason she moved there although I haven't directly asked). They are always at her parents. From what I can tell, they go over most Sunday's and DIL sees her mum regularly so seems a bit ott. DILs parents are very nice people but see DIL as a bit of a princess and lavish her and DS with attention and nice holidays, things, meals out etc. This isn't about money, as we are not struggling so don't get the wrong impression. I have noticed that when DS is around his Pils he is different to how he is around our family and they speak to each other as though they are all friends. I really notice this when I am around my son and DIL's parents. Lots of jokes and v informal.

I guess we are a little less 'fun' and I am the first to admit I'm not overly maternal but I do resent the fact that we never hear from them. DIL and son might text from time to time but I never hear from them. I don't like to interfere so obviously I don't harass them. Perhaps DILs parents impose on them but I don't want to be like that. Every single Christmas they spend Xmas day at her parents and DIL and son have us over at theirs on Boxing Day. Always the same and I anticipate this year to be the same.

Here's the thing. Son told me about 6 months ago that DIL is having fertility treatment but I didn't pry so I assume IVF. They haven't updated me once ever since. I know it's not DIL per se as she's not a nasty girl but I feel like they are all for her parents. My son is as much to blame here and I know he also prefers her parents as he is now very good friends with DILs brothers. I can't help but resent DIL.

We have another son (he and his brother are not close) but I feel like son just acts as though he has made a decision to prefer her parents and doesn't make any effort with us. AIBU? Has anyone else ever been placed in this position?

OP posts:
Aerfen · 14/07/2016 13:09

Several others have said this up thread.
Many couples/ families choose to spend more time with the relatives they like and who are nice to them than the ones they don't like and aren't nice to them

You have missed the point.
It is unusual for a daughter to favour her PILS to the point of rejecting her own family. This is because your own family are familiar and the relationhsip almost always more relaxed. I dont know why youre trying to deny that?

Everyone knows in law relationships, however lovely they are, have more potential to be strained, especially between the two women, MILS worry about upsetting their DIls and vice versa in a way mums and daughters dont!

Most of the tales in the thread of one set of GPs being 'better' are daughters complaining about their PILs and preferring their own parents!

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 14/07/2016 15:03

Not everyone is good company

Giving birth does not make you good company.

When you're children are children they have to spend time with you, when they're adults it'll depend on whether they like you or not.

Initially you love your parents out of instinct, because infants have to form a bond with their care givers in order to survive. That love'll either continue and grow as you become an adult and know your parents in a different way: adult to adult. Or it'll decline if they're not particularly likable people.

Some women (and sons) don't like their mothers but still see them regularly out of duty - it seems excruciating all round, what's the point if noone is enjoying it? I'ld be mortified if anyone had me in their life just out of duty.

Lymmmummy · 14/07/2016 16:55

I have not read the full 18 pages but my view is
Daughters are often closer to their mothers - this will be especially the case if they live close not sure there is much you can do about that
The issue of you not being included as much is really an issue between yourself and your son and I think you are right not to demonise DIL - which is what many MIL have tendency to do
It takes courage and self awareness to admit you may not be as maternal or fun - my MIL is neither of these things but thinks she is gods gift v difficult demanding and ungrateful then wonders why we stopped making it a priority to v - so can you work on inviting them to do some fun things visit to an exciting place or event or short break

I am imagining your fear is that if the pattern is set of your side of the family being seen as an occasional matters this may continue with respect to grandchildren

Like I say you come across to me as genuine and as not wanting to be overbearing - but perhaps you need to try and set a bit of the agenda yourself

howdoyoueatanelephant · 14/07/2016 16:56

I think you are being unresonable! You just need to make a bit of effort. I get that you feel jealous but it seems silly to resent someones close relationship with their parents whilst also detailing that you're not really making that much effort yourself! If you feel resentful now, imagine how much more you will feel once there is a baby in the picture. Lighten up a bit and start being nice.... this is not really about maternal instinct, its about being kind and friendly. Pop round occasionally, take flowers. Send flowers in the post, send notes.... whatever, just make some effort. Ask your DS how the baby making is going. Maybe you could help..... infertility treatment is expensive, get saving. maybe DIL is stressed running about after your son, send her a spa day for her and a friend so she can chill out... tell DS to pull his finger out and help more round the house. This is really an opportunity for you to build a relationship with your DIL, future mum to your future grandkids. seriously get on with it, good support can really make a difference in the lives of your son, his wife and their future children and in return will bring you so much happiness, but relationships have to be worked on, they dont just happen. Good luck xxx

Kr1stina · 14/07/2016 18:26

You have missed the point. It is unusual for a daughter to favour her PILS to the point of rejecting her own family. This is because your own family are familiar and the relationhsip almost always more relaxed. I dont know why youre trying to deny that?

You are connecting two things that are not connected. Women don't " reject their own family" because they " favour their PIL" .

People go LC or NC with certain family members because of that persons behaviour . It's nothing to do with them " favouring " their in laws. It's not either / or. Most people are happy to have two loving families and work hard to juggle their lives around this .

People who go NC or Lc usually do it because of the pain and hurt caused by YEARS of cruel , thoughtless or selfish behaviour .

I am labouring this point because there are certain people in my ( and perhaps your generation ) who simply will not accept any responsibility in their relationships with their adult children .

It's always " oh my DIL has forced my son not to see me "
They favour the others so are ignoring me

They keep putting the blame on others so the problem can never be addressed. Even when their children sit down and TELL THEM what the problem is , they ignore it.

karigan is not seeing less of her parents BEACUSE her IL are great. She is seeing less of her parents because they are miserable and her kids have no fun there . As a consequence , she probably sees more of the inlaws because they have more time . But it's EFFECT Not CAUSE

Can't you see the difference ? Because it's really important

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 14/07/2016 18:29

exactly

People who "reject" their birth family would do so whether or not they had PILs to spend christmasses with!

However sometimes it is a slight catalyst, because seeing your partner's loving functional family can confirm your feelings that your own family isn't worth persevering with.. you'ld get there eventually anyway if you were single, but it can be a push to do it sooner.

TopiaryBun · 14/07/2016 18:35

Most people are happy to have two loving families and work hard to juggle their lives around this .

Or, in our case, be very fond of both sets of parents and Skype very often, but have lived in a different country for our entire adult lives, so any kind of parents vs ILs Sturm und Drang just doesn't really come up. Grin

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 14/07/2016 18:55

In short; some people are assholes

Assholes don't exclusively have sons, just as many have daughters, and many of those daughters realise their parents are assholes once the daughter is grown up and isn't a captive audience to said assholeness and can find healthier relationships elsewhere

Whether or not an asshole's grown kids do or don't have a husband/wife nice PILs is irrelevant, if they're assholes chances are their kids'll want less to do with them

(not calling the OP an asshole, just replying to the "daughters are closer to their parents" stuff)

JessicasElephant · 14/07/2016 20:48

I don't really understand this idea of 'fairness' when it comes to relationships. I see far more of my mum than my dad because I like her more. I see some of my siblings more than others because we get on better. Running my life trying to ensure that everyone gets a fair share of my time seems depressing, self-important and hard work. In an ideal world a couple would equally enjoy spending time with both sides of the family. But often that doesn't happen. Are they seriously expected to split their time equally even if that makes them unhappy?! Screw that for a game if soldiers. Spend time with people you like, and if you want to see more of someone then reach out.

Aerfen · 15/07/2016 01:17

Adulting
karigan is not seeing less of her parents BEACUSE her IL are great. She is seeing less of her parents because they are miserable and her kids have no fun there . As a consequence , she probably sees more of the inlaws because they have more time . But it's EFFECT Not CAUSE

I didnt say it was the cause. You misunderstand me. To rephrase a little I said she rejects her own parents to such an extent, that as a consequence the PILS have ended up being the 'favoured' ones.
That is pretty unusual for daughters especially, while sons will often, even if they dont reject their own parents, neglect them to such an extent that the PILS end up being the favoured ones.
This is why it is far far more common for paternal grandparents to feel sidelined.

On this thread alone of those women who have been critical of one set of grandparents more are criticising their PILS than their own parents.

I think its telling too that they often say 'we' including their OH , as if its a joint opinion, when I suggest their OH if asked in private might take a somewhat different view, and would admit they they see less of his parents because his partner prefers to spend time with hers.

I think the suggestions that the OP should have to spend money to win the love of the DIL, sending flowers, treating them to days out, is appalling too, even contributing to the cost her infertility treatment.
Eek!Shock
What if she cannot afford such generosity?
What if the son and DIL are far better off financially than her?
Or what if the DILs parents, the favoured ones, are better placed to help out financially than she is?

Aerfen · 15/07/2016 01:26

not calling the OP an asshole

Should hope not! Most parents are NOT.

just replying to the "daughters are closer to their parents" stuff

Nobody is saying ALL are, but in general its true. Most grown up daughters do remain closer to their birth families than sons do (again plenty of exceptions).

I also think men more often indulge their wives in terms of going along with their wish to involve their parents. Quite a lot of women will go on holiday with their own parents for example to have help with child care but few want to take in laws along!

dobbythedoggy · 15/07/2016 09:10

Dh and I live across the road from my parents. I see a lot of them with the dc and it is unusual for me not to see them for more than a couple of days. They get involved in our everyday lives. Dh tends to be on call a lot so the dc need to come with me so my mum likes to come along to help out. My dad and dh take on the odd project together and will always help each other out. They are relaxed and flexible and good at reading social cues. We tend to holiday with them and do days out because they make it easy to do so. We both have keys to each others houses and easily come and go as no one out stays their welcome and will instantly leave if it isn't a good time. Dh will often spend time alone with them and encourages me to do lots with my mum if he hears about things she'd enjoy. It is pure chance that we live so close together as a property came up with our letting agents when their former landlord gave them notice and was able to accept their pets.

On the other hand pils live about an hours worth of traveling away. Logistically it makes it much more difficult to see them. Added to the fact dh doesn't enjoy spending time with them as he constantly has to watch what his saying and gets blamed for everything we see very little of them. Dh doesn't have much time where he can travle out to see them and mil is reluctant to "bother" us when he invites her out. He hates talking to her on phone because she shows very little intrest in his life and just moans and then twists everything he says. In an ideal world he would leave dealing with his family to me but so much damage waa done by their demands when I was pregnant with dd I don't feel comfortable seeing them alone. Keeeping up contact with mil, fil is nice enough but just doesn't get involved, is the one thing we really argued about. So for a happy relationship I just leave dh to it.

Mil did visit yesterday because fil has some time off work and accepted dh's invite out. Mil talked about how little she'd seen of us all, how she missed us, how she knows how busy we are, how tired dh is from work and how I like to get the dc out and about. Then refused 3 separate times for visiting dh surrgested because she's seen us now! Dh was really hurt and took a few hours to stop muttering about being stuck with his bloody family and ask me what was so hard about just getting on with things like my lot do.

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 15/07/2016 17:33

Aerfen, you don't sound like you think very much of men in general, read back how you've described half the population there!

Men can and do chose to see less of their parents, it might be conveneiant for his parents to blame the DIL in many of those cases, doesn't make it true. Most men I know know their own mind and aren't as wet as the ones you describe.

Aerfen · 15/07/2016 23:30

Adulting
I didnt put a proportion on it. That was you.

And no I dont think all the men who spend more time with their wife's parents are going along with their wishes because they are being 'wet' as you put it, but just because they are more laid back and don't really care, while their wives do.

It's self evident that for all the old MIL jokes are told by male stand ups, the far more common in law tensions arise between DILs and MILs.

Aerfen · 15/07/2016 23:39

"it might be convenient for his parents to blame the DIL in many of those cases"

And its equally convenient for DILs to blame the PILs or just the MIL, when the truth is its just she that actively wants to spend more time with her own parents rather than her husbands wish!

A readiness to 'blame' works two ways.

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 16/07/2016 02:42

A DIL could see her parents 7 days a week.. she's still not the one responsible for the PILs&Sons relationship. That's between them. If an adult son isn't that bothered about his relationship with his parents and is happy to go along with seeing lots of the ILs and not them.. then there was something lacking in that relationship long before the DIL came along

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 16/07/2016 02:46

It's self evident that for all the old MIL jokes are told by male stand ups, the far more common in law tensions arise between DILs and MILs.

It's not tension if a woman says to her male partner, "look, I already do all the work to keep in touch with my own family, its up to you to organise stuff with your family" - that's balance

If someone thinks that women are causing "tension" if they don't maintain their male partners relationships with his own parents for him, then there'll be tension where there needn't be any… still not the daughter in laws fault or responsibility

OlennasWimple · 16/07/2016 03:01

Women are always at fault, whether MiL or DiL Adulting Sad

Noodledoodledoo · 16/07/2016 04:59

In my situation my MIL can't complain we see my mum more as she is no longer with us she has no one to compete with. However doesn't make an effort at all. Has seen her GC 5 times in 22 months. Mostly us going to them.

Refuses most offers of visits. We do keep trying but it's flipping hard work.

My dad is much easier and less expecting of anything.

Kr1stina · 16/07/2016 09:11

Of course it's the woman's fault, it always is. Shes wrong if she is close to her own family , because she " prefers " them or " favours " them.

How DARE SHE love her own family! Once she marries she must adjust her own relationship with her family to make it exactly the same as her husband's with his family. If he sees his twice a year , she must only see hers that often .

Because fairness .

She's wrong if her husband and chooses to see less of his own parents, whereas he's not at fault at all, on no, it's just because he's " laid back " . Because it's HER JOB to be his social secretary and fix his family of origin, however dysfunctional it is.

Because patriarchy .

Aerfen · 16/07/2016 11:05

It's self evident that for all the old MIL jokes are told by male stand ups, the far more common in law tensions arise between DILs and MILs.

It's not tension if a woman says to her male partner, "look, I already do all the work to keep in touch with my own family, its up to you to organise stuff with your family" - that's balance If someone thinks that women are causing "tension" if they don't maintain their male partners relationships with his own parents for him, then there'll be tension where there needn't be any… still not the daughter in laws fault or responsibility

You've completely missed the point Adulting. The reality is there often are tensions between MILS and DILS regardless of whether they see each other often or not, regardless of whether the son makes an effort to maintain relationships or not!

It was suggested earlier that the reason families saw one set of parents more than the other was entirely down to how likable they were. I am saying that isnt the case.

Most daughters prefer their own mothers to their MILS (rare exceptions of course, and some get on with both), thus they usually naturally gravitate more towards their own families. Many (not all) sons are less good at maintaining the relationship with their own families, and that is not always the fault of their mothers for not being 'nice' enough! And while sons must always carry a big share of the blame if they make no effort for their parents, DILs can be selfish and obstructive because they actively do not wantt to spend time with the PILS, and there is only so much time in the year that can be spent with ANY parents. If for example every Sunday is lunch at her mums, then it does make it difficult for PILS to get a look in! Likewise if her parents are taken on holiday with them every summer to help look after the GCs then that is blatantly unfair!

Patriarchy is still with us, and for all progress has been made women are usually still the primary organisers of family time, and it is unfair to the DHs parents when the DIL makes no effort to get a reasonable balance, and an excuse for bad DIL behaviour to lay ALL the blame on the DH for not defending his parents need to spend time with the family too, especially when there are GCs involved.

Kristina. There has been a great deal of 'blaming' of the OP on this thread while she herself has been 'blaming' the DIL.
See my point above.

startrek90 · 16/07/2016 11:57

Why should the DIL 'make an effort' to get a reasonable balance? Have men not got voices? Have men got a complete inability to manage their own family relationships? Are they incompetant? Are they just too stupid to manage relationships? Why aren't men good at maintaining relationships?

Surely if they are not good they need more practice then.

You are being so sexist Aerfen. The only way women are going to stop this expectation of emotional labour is if they stop doing it.

It is perfectly reasonable for a woman to refuse to manage the relationships of her husband.

He knows his family better than she, he understands the dynamic better than she does. If he chooses not to do that labour then that is on him, not her.

Why do you expect women to do all the emotional labour?

My MIL doesn't expect me to manage hers sons relationship with her. He is a big boy and does it all himself, right now he has taken our son to see her -I am not avoiding her btw I just got a lie in instead! :)

BarryTheKestrel · 16/07/2016 12:16

Frankly YABVU. It is not her job to keep you informed. It is also not entirely your son's job. You have said you don't have much contact with them, if you don't put in the effort why should they?
My grandparents are very similar, they never call or text and hardly ever see us, yet complain to anyone who will listen that we don't care and they don't know what's going on in our lives. I make a point of calling them once a week to keep them at bay but they are disinterested and never ask any questions.

Stop going on about not wanting to impose, harass or hassle and contact your son and talk to him. Make plans with them. See them as a couple. This is what her parents do, which is why they see them more and are close to them.

Being family doesn't entitle you to anything. Putting in the effort and showing you care gets you much further.

This is not her fault. Do not blame her or her parents in this. This is between you and your son and the evident lack of relationship you have.

AdultingIsNotWhatIExpected · 16/07/2016 12:22

Kristina. There has been a great deal of 'blaming' of the OP on this thread while she herself has been 'blaming' the DIL

The OP said in her opening post that her family isn't as much fun to be around, and that she is not "maternal" - posters picking up on that are not "MIL blaming" - they're listening to the OP who clearly IS less good company than the ILs here

But I suppose its the DILs fault, she should MAKE her partners mother be more fun and maternal? Hmm

Aerfen · 16/07/2016 15:41

startrk said
"You are being so sexist Aerfen. The only way women are going to stop this expectation of emotional labour is if they stop doing it."

No I am not being sexist. I am acknowledging that still roles of men and women in the family are different. They have drawn closer together but they are not identical. Still far more women than men with children work part time for example and still women far more than men organise family activities.

Its no surprise that the majority of posters who are mostly women not men, DILs but not MILS are casting DILs in the role of innocents and blaming EVERYONE except the DIL in the OPs post. The MIL is to blame, the son is to blame, but NOT the DIL.

The OP has been remarkably self depracating describing herself as 'less fun' and 'not maternal' but if we are to take her description as accurate (and who knows she may be just insecure and intimidated by the DILS louder more extrovert family), then equally you should accept her description of the DIL as 'princessy' i.e a little spoiled, bratty, likes to be the centre of attention, likes her own way. To ignore this is just confirmation bias.

What makes you think she is blameless? How do you know she isnt immature and selfish, prefers being her parents 'little girl' and is cleverly but determindly putting barriers in the way of her husband and herself spending time with the PILS because she just doesnt want them around?

I am not saying that IS the case, but its equally ridiculous to put all the blame on the OP and her alleged 'bad relationship' with her son. Sh said nothing implying her relationship with her son wanst good, ONLY that she doesnt see much of him now. She doenst even say if she saw more of him before this DIL arrived on the scene. Maybe she did!

Swipe left for the next trending thread