Is Radical Wind and her blog the new Scum Manifesto......................
(by which I mean the example trotted out to show how ludicrous/violent/mad (some) feminist thought(s) are).
And those who find "UTOPIA: what would a women’s society look like?" shocking/puzzling/weird obviously haven't read much feminist post-patriarchy womens science fiction (Herland,:Charlotte Perkins Gilman, The Female Man: Joanna Russ). Trying to envisage such a future, even an extreme and distorted one, is fairly standard in feminist literary circles.
As regards 'All PIV is rape' -- I think it isn't so much that you agree, but can you actually demolish the argument that leads to that conclusion? Just saying 'it's bonkers' repeatedly doesn't count, although instructive in a way that it's the conclusion being rejected as so obviously ludicrous rather than showing why it is wrong.
I think of this type of thinking (Scum manifesto etc) as parody, satire and hyperbole. That the patriarchal normality and ways of thought are so ingrained that such extreme excursions are useful to highlight what might be changed. RADICAL feminism meaning getting right to the root of the issue as to why relations between men and women are the way they are (and how they might be changed). The monetary importance of pornography alone tells us that there is more going on here than simple sexual pleasure for all..........and what is the prime act repeated again and again in pornography. Penis in something. If pornography is viewed as propaganda rather than simple pleasure material, then what is it that it is espousing?
Anyway, the existence of the ensuing discussion on this thread shows that the hyperbole has achieved something, in that I don't think this discussion would have got going without it.