I have been pondering this, because a few clearly sensible (not thick) posters have dared to suggest that 'flirt' might be 'ok'.
I wonder if perhaps there are some differences of interpretation here. I don't for a second believe that anyone on this thread believes that a baby or toddler is flirting to mean sexual attraction(at least I hope not!). I am defending all your views here when I cautiously propose that those of you who have so passionately torn down anyone who suggests a baby could flirt (I was one to be torn down) are quite rightly imagining something weird and a ridiculously premature beginnings of loss of innocence. I entirely agree with the negative responses to this notion, so I don't need anyone to explain this again. The point has been made very clear on the thread.
I am not proposing or defending an alternative position, I am merely suggesting that some posters might have different interpretation of the word 'flirt'. (I do NOT include 'sexy' here, for me there is no room for interpretation with that word).
Or example, some people are known to 'flirt' with both men and women at work on a daily basis. Others would say they are simply engaging with people on a personal level, and good relationships help to further one's career. They would be outraged at the suggestion that flirting is involved. Who is right? It is a matter of personal perception.
Speaking personally my mother is American, and refers to babies flirting in the most innocent way you could imagine. She is also the most buttoned up, over-protective, small-town, naive, former cheerleader you could possibly imagine. She would faint at the suggestion that her words could cause offence - she just wouldn't get it! She adores children and would say flirt to mean exactly what has been rightly stated in this thread...a friendly baby learning to engage with the world in a positive way. She just happens to call it flirting, with no mental connection with how adults flirt whatsoever. Almost like an entirely different verb. I'm not saying this is a good thing, I am just saying I don't think it is as offensive as posters here might quickly conclude. You might not like the choice of word, but it isn't actually disgusting or offensive.
While I assume we all agree that sexualisation of children is revolting, and absolutely let them be children for as long as possible, I am simply asking if there may be more innocent explanations for any disagreements on this subject which are less offensive than we all fear.
There is no need to all jump down my throat now...I am just keeping this thread alive as I think it is a really interesting one and I have got value from everything you have all shared.