"It doesn't make it better but she wasn't a friend of mine"
I think this statement rings the most instinctively truthful (to me), among all those you have written.
[Understand that I am not saying that I think everything else you have written is lies, not at all, just that this seemed to me to be the most honest].
'She wasn't a friend of yours', so it cannot be said that you owed her anything. Not loyalty, not honesty, not regard for her feelings, not any of the considerations of friendship.
[I do find it a bit strange that in the ten years of their relationship, you haven't formed any feelings towards your best friend's long term partner. Friendship, dislike, affinity, hatred? Nothing??]
Given that 'she wasn't a friend of yours' it could be argued that you should give her no more consideration than you would ordinarily choose to give a total stranger, so if you have behaved (towards her) in a manner befitting the standards you would ordinarily set for yourself (in your behavior towards people who are nothing to do with you), then you have nothing to reproach yourself with or feel guilty about.
Indeed, if that is fact, then (in my opinion) your 'best friend' has manipulated you, while treating his (now ex) long term partner horribly, and doesn't sound too much like anyone's friend (best or otherwise).
I say "could be argued", but I can visualise a few other scenarios here, too. For example, I can't help wondering if maybe your 'best friend's (now ex) long term partner would feel doubly gutted and betrayed if she knew it was you with whom he had cheated upon her, because perhaps over the years she had come to consider you her friend, too. Maybe. Just wondering.