Yes, but surely the moderators should engage their brains when deciding whether or not to delete posts that have been reported.
I would like to know what process is in place to determine which posts break talk guidelines - at the moment, it seems that things are getting deleted on a whim and then potentially reinstated later.
Does that mean that the moderators have had insufficient guidance or training on what to delete and what to let stand, resulting in different mods arriving at different judgements?
Or does it mean that they only give posts a quick cursory glance when deciding whether or not to delete, without actually bothering to engage with the detail?
I can't see that either scenario is going to result in effective moderation.