I thought I made myself quite clear what I was getting at over the several posts I made, but for your benefit, I’ll try again. I’ll break it down for you.
Farage surrounds himself with very rich and powerful people and is a known ally of the MAGA movement and the Russian regime. He very likely knew exactly what was in the Epstein files, and very likely knew what was being sat on waiting to be released.
It was known that Mandelson was corrupt and would leak information for money, so he was quite useful for a short time.
Farage endorsed his appointment as US ambassador, as reported in the press here, and Farage is also connected to some very corrupt and powerful people whose interests it would serve to have Mandelson appointed, so whilst I’m not suggesting that Farage had any direct influence on Mandelson’s appointment, what I am suggesting is that he would have been connected to those people who would want him in the role, hence he came out saying he was a very intelligent man and a good pick.
There is nothing to say that Mandelson’s appointment wasn’t influenced by those connected to Farage in some way, and that the reason Farage was happy that Mandelson was appointed is because he knew that MAGA had information about him in the Epstein files waiting to be released to undermine the British government, which it did, and ultimately led to Starmer’s resignation.
When the Epstein files did drop with all the incriminating evidence against Mandelson, this gave Farage political leverage against the government to use to gain favour amongst the electorate. ‘Look how incompetent this government is!’
There is already evidence in the files that Steve Bannon, Trumps advisor, attempted to overthrow Theresa May and other European leaders, and it benefits both Russia and the US for a far right party to gain power in the UK and other EU countries. You are being deliberately mislead for their benefit.
Edited