Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What's wrong with sleepovers?

311 replies

PeatandDieselfan · 28/05/2025 11:06

Accidentally watched a reel on Facebook the other day with an "influencer mommy" holding her PFB and boasting about all the things her baby will not be allowed to do over the next couple of decades, which included sleepovers (cue left-right wagging of perfectly manicured finger.) I didn't understand what she was on about, and obviously dismissed it as nonsense and gave my head a little wobble for even losing time to watching said nonsense, and went about my day.

Since then, I have noticed a few mentions on here of people not allowing their children to have sleepovers, or not before secondary school. I am genuinely interested why? Because, in my experience, sleepovers are a huge thrill for 6-11 year olds, mine loved it at that age, but now they teenagers/almost teenagers sleepovers aren't really "a thing" any more - they do different things with friends.

So why are parents anti-sleepover? I mean, I know it can be a pain to host them (sometimes) and kids are like zombies the next day, but they have a lot of fun, and it's a pretty short phase in the greater scheme of things, so why not? If it's a safeguarding thing, surely you could just have a rule about only with friends where you already know the parents/ have had a few successful playdates first, rather than a blanket (see what I did there!) ban?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Hwi · 28/05/2025 13:12

Sleepovers serve no purpose. However, residential trips (scouts, etc.) are wonderful, educational, fun. Yet they too carry risks. I let mine have one sleep-over (waste of time), hosted two (hassle and waste of time) and I also let mine go on all residentials, whilst I was chewing the carpet, waiting for the return home. Risks are everywhere - teachers, doctors, neighbours, strangers. Aaaaaaah

MrsSunshine2b · 28/05/2025 13:13

You see a lot of this on the internet but in real life it's not really common.

DD is 5 so too young for a sleepover but no-one in her friendship group is anti-sleepover.

You obviously take precautions, I wouldn't let her stay with strangers or if I wasn't comfortable with someone's parenting and I'd send her with a charged phone to contact us if she wanted to leave at any point, but anyone thinking their child doesn't miss out on having the fun of a sleepover is kidding themselves.

SA can happen anywhere and with anyone, even people you trust completely. It doesn't just happen at night.

Hollerationinthedancerieeee · 28/05/2025 13:17

Botanybaby · 28/05/2025 12:50

People are obsessed that everyone is a predator and that's why

Weird how they are absolutely fine for school trips and girl guide camps though

I would still be a bit concerned but take some comfort in the fact that there will be adult supervision by people who have been DBS checked, that safeguarding should have been factored into the planning and you can check it has been beforehand.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

PumpkinSpicePie · 28/05/2025 13:17

I've seen people say they won't allow play dates on here. They were a major part of my kids' childhood and I remember on the programme Child of our Time they said playing at a friend's house was children's favourite thing to do. Above theme parks etc

mindutopia · 28/05/2025 13:21

The thing is that children don’t need to spend the night somewhere to be sexually abused. I think the paranoia around sleepovers lulls people into a false sense of security that everything else is okay. Foolishly so.

I was sexually abused. On a play date at a trusted neighbour’s house. One I never had a sleepover with. I have 2 family members who have been convicted of child sexual offences. Neither of them ever abused anyone on a sleepover. In one case, the child was his own daughter. In the other case, a niece who he saw at family functions.

Funny enough, in both cases we are NC with them because we obviously want to keep our children safe. We are the only parents in the extended family who don’t allow contact with these two paedophiles. I bet some of these parents are no sleepover types. 🙄 But they allow unsupervised contact between their children and a known convicted child sexual abuser who served prison time for offences against another child in the family. Because who wants to make a fuss? And he’s old and harmless enough, right? It boggles the mind.

Fwiw, yes, I allow sleepovers with adults who I trust. I listen to my gut and teach my dc the same and I have no qualms about saying no or going to collect mine if something doesn’t feel right.

Justgoodforthegetting · 28/05/2025 13:22

HazelNewt · 28/05/2025 12:55

I don’t understand the ‘you are more likely to be abused by x’ posts. Yes, and? Childcare is necessary for working parents, and nurseries have safeguards in place making instances of abuse extremely rare. Childcare is pretty unavoidable if you have to work. Having family members is sort of hard to avoid too, although at least you can ensure you remain under the same roof and may be able to say more confidently that your child is safe or take measures to ensure that (although sadly not in all cases).

The sad fact is that there are too many people with an unhealthy interest in children, and too many abused. Yes it tends to be someone they know, and parents, grandparents and siblings have the greatest access making them the greatest risk. It’s a matter of access though isn’t it? A sleepover can and will be used as a means to abuse children by these people, and there are sadly many people on this thread even who have experienced that.

A sleepover is not only an occasion where you have no oversight over what circumstances your child is in at their most vulnerable, it’s also entirely unnecessary and avoidable which is why people can avoid the risk. I think you can of course make whatever choices you like, but justifying it by saying ‘well my child’s dad is the biggest risk statistically’ is a ridiculous argument in favour of sleepovers!

Totally agree with this, it’s such a stupid and short sighted argument isn’t it.

Like “well there are bigger risks out there so fuck it, I’ll take the gamble”
I think the people that use this argument are either incredibly lacking in common sense or just want to have a contrary opinion for the sake of it.

AhBiscuits · 28/05/2025 13:22

I was touched up by my friend's teenage brother.

That said, I do allow sleepovers with families I know well. Life is not risk free and all you can do is take what precautions you can and talk to your children about dangers and appropriate behaviours. The risk of something happening is still low and your children need to enjoy their lives.

vinavine · 28/05/2025 13:22

I don’t understand the ‘you are more likely to be abused by x’ posts. Yes, and? Childcare is necessary for working parents, and nurseries have safeguards in place making instances of abuse extremely rare.

It's likely far more common at a nursery on in your own home than a sleepover. The majority of dc who have a sleepover will not be abused & yet people are linking to a case where dc were murdered as to why they don't do it.

ExercicenformedeZ · 28/05/2025 13:25

Because people are obsessed with the idea that there are paedophiles lurking on every street. I don't get it myself. I always had a blast at sleepovers growing up. My parents didn't let me go with just anyone, only with trusted friends, but I wouldn't have swapped those times for anything.

vinavine · 28/05/2025 13:26

Totally agree with this, it’s such a stupid and short sighted argument isn’t it

People are completely missing the point.

Life is not risk free

Exactly

The thing is that children don’t need to spend the night somewhere to be sexually abused. I think the paranoia around sleepovers lulls people into a false sense of security that everything else is okay. Foolishly so.

Agree

But they allow unsupervised contact between their children and a known convicted child sexual abuser who served prison time for offences against another child in the family. Because who wants to make a fuss? And he’s old and harmless enough, right? It boggles the mind.

wowsers @mindutopia that is unfathomable

Blanknotebook · 28/05/2025 13:26

It’s not only sexual predators to be aware of. I am a dog lover and have my own dogs, but there are some dogs that I would not want to come into contact with. I remember the poor child in Wales that went to a friend’s house for a play date and was killed by the family’s dog.

ExercicenformedeZ · 28/05/2025 13:26

AhBiscuits · 28/05/2025 13:22

I was touched up by my friend's teenage brother.

That said, I do allow sleepovers with families I know well. Life is not risk free and all you can do is take what precautions you can and talk to your children about dangers and appropriate behaviours. The risk of something happening is still low and your children need to enjoy their lives.

I'm very sorry that happened to you, and I applaud you for your measured attitude to it. As you say, nothing in life is completely without risk and I think that your attitude is the correct one.

Justgoodforthegetting · 28/05/2025 13:28

ExercicenformedeZ · 28/05/2025 13:25

Because people are obsessed with the idea that there are paedophiles lurking on every street. I don't get it myself. I always had a blast at sleepovers growing up. My parents didn't let me go with just anyone, only with trusted friends, but I wouldn't have swapped those times for anything.

I work with paedophiles and sex offenders and they are so terrifyingly common, they almost are on every street, certainly in every town, estate. You’d never know, they are incredibly manipulative and charming often.

Thank goodness you never had a negative experience, but there are many many more adults and children out there who have not been as lucky.

sHREDDIES19 · 28/05/2025 13:28

There are risks with most choices we make in life, but it's about mitigating risks and taking sensible precautions. My son has loved sleepovers with his bestie (they still have them even though they are now teens) but I know the mum very well, she is a good friend. My daughter isn't keen on sleeping over someone's house as she is a home bird but she has friends stay over ours. Again I am good friends with the mums and they trust me to take good care of their children, which I take very seriously.

vinavine · 28/05/2025 13:29

I would still be a bit concerned but take some comfort in the fact that there will be adult supervision by people who have been DBS checked, that safeguarding should have been factored into the planning and you can check it has been beforehand

No way, this is the complete opposite of what you should do! A DBS doesn't mean someone hasn't abused a child! I would be far more wary of a scout camp than a sleepover. Predators position themselves in jobs with access not just hoping their dc has a friend over to stay.

Hollietree · 28/05/2025 13:29

I knew two men during my childhood that later turned out to be Paedophiles. Both were good friends of my parents, absolutely lovely charming salt of the earth men, kind, funny, respectable jobs, married, one with his own children. Both men I could NEVER have dreamt would be a danger to children in a million years.

These dangerous men walk among us. And they are people that you know really well, people you trust, people you would never dream have this dark side to them.

As a consequence I will never risk my children having sleepovers at other people’s houses. Even close friends.

vinavine · 28/05/2025 13:30

@Justgoodforthegetting and did most of them do their abusing on sleepovers?

vinavine · 28/05/2025 13:31

@Blanknotebook I would send my dc to a house with a banned dog.

vinavine · 28/05/2025 13:31

would not!

Calmdownpeople · 28/05/2025 13:31

I completely understand if someone has experienced something horrific and I am truly sorry to all those that have.

Unfortunately I know women who were abused as children and it wasn’t at a sleepover.

There is a really difficult line between being cautious and letting kids experience fun things. I think in general kids are protected too much these days and stats tell us that horrific events don’t happen anymore than they used to. But everyone lives their own experience.

I let my kids have sleepovers and have had other kids sleep over. They have also done school residentials and scouts equivalent. And DoE.

I grew up in a town where a boy was kidnapped and murdered from a local mall so understand parental caution (and yes I don’t equate this to pedos) but it’s the balance . We wouldn’t ever go outside because of all the dangers either. Or leave kids with a sitter or let them walk to school alone. It’s an individual choice.

MrsKeats · 28/05/2025 13:31

InvasiveSpecies · 28/05/2025 11:09

I was raped when I was ten by someone my parents knew and were fine with me being around. 'Already knowing' the parents is no real safeguard.

Edited

So sorry you went through that.

amyds2104 · 28/05/2025 13:32

Youbutterbelieve · 28/05/2025 11:58

The number 1 risk of sexual abuse to a child is a step parent. It's the biggest risk by far, but rarely talked about or acknowledge. After that it's once removed relations - uncles, grandparents, cousins.

You’ve missed sibling on sibling sexual abuse too. It’s one no one wants to hear/think about. That happens in a child’s own home and sometimes sleepovers at other people’s homes are a protective measure!

Wife2b · 28/05/2025 13:32

My girl will be allowed sleepovers - at our house. Obviously her friend’s parents may have reservations and that’s ok. As a social worker, I have seen too many houses with poor home conditions, domestic violence, drugs, alcohol abuse, then of course there is the sex offenders. You can’t tell from just looking at someone, I have been in rich houses and poor houses, seemingly nice parents, outwardly horrible parents. You just don’t know and without being able to do a police background check, my answer will be a resounding no.

HuskyNew · 28/05/2025 13:33

vinavine · 28/05/2025 12:12

Most sexual abuse is by a father or step father so I'm not sure sleepovers are the protection people think they are...

the two are not related.

that’s like saying I don’t use cycle helmets because I can swim so don’t need a buoyancy aid.

MrsKeats · 28/05/2025 13:34

Botanybaby · 28/05/2025 12:50

People are obsessed that everyone is a predator and that's why

Weird how they are absolutely fine for school trips and girl guide camps though

Have some empathy for the people on here who have suffered. Read the room.