annual EHCP review is due so we've got a meeting booked in for the 13th of October.
@Jimmyneutronsforehead, the AR process should be as follows:
- Updated advice and information must be circulated at least 2 weeks prior to the AR meeting.
- Then you have the AR meeting.
- Within 2 weeks of the AR meeting, a report must be circulated.
- Within 4 weeks of the AR meeting, the LA must inform you if they propose to amend or not. If they are, they must send the amendment notice/draft/notice of amendment/proposed amendments (whatever the LA/you want to call it) at the same time and you must be given at least 15 days to comment on the amendments and state your preferred placement.
- Then, if the LA is amending, the LA must finalise within 8 weeks of sending the proposed amendments.
Before the AR meeting it is a good idea to go through the current EHCP, existing evidence and the updated advice and information (they you should have by now) so you know what needs amending and if you need any further evidnece.
Go through all the reports with highlighters. Highlight all DS’s special educational needs in one colour and all the provision to meet DS’s needs in another colour. Each need should have corresponding provision. There should also be corresponding outcomes.
Then go through the EHCP and make sure all the highlighted needs are in B and the highlighted provision is in F. Make a note of anything the LA has omitted, any needs without corresponding provision, any woolly and vague wording.
When checking F look out for vague and woolly wording - “access to”, “or equivalent”, “opportunities for”, “as appropriate”, “would benefit from”, “regular”, “up to”, “would be useful/helpful”, “such as”, “e.g.”, “etc.”, “as required”, “as advised”, “key adult(s)”, “small group”. If provision isn’t detailed, specified and quantified the EHCP isn’t worth the paper it is written on and cannot be enforced.
When you come across vague and woolly wording, check the reports to see if they are woolly and vague or if the LA has watered down provision. Provision in EHCPs is taken from the reports, so if the reports are vague and woolly the EHCP will be too.
This way, you know where the weaknesses are, what needs amending, and what updated advice and information is needed.
Also make sure any health or social care provision that educates or trains is in F. For example, LAs like to put things like SALT, OT, physio, etc. in G (health care provision) when it belongs in F.
@Leafywool LAs act as the do because it saves them money. What to you is bizarre and inefficient is a carefully crafted tactic to put parents off and save money. It makes sense when you consider it from the LA’s PoV. The vagueness of what happens now is also a carefully crafted tactic. Just another way of stringing parents along.