Woman, 41, pretended to be a boy to groom a girl

[TurfClub]

Jacinta Brooks is a serial paedophile

metro.co.uk/2018/10/01/trans-woman-pretended-to-be-a-boy-to-groom-a-girl-7994533/

"Prosecutor Berenice Mulvanny said that police found screenshots of the conversation with the girl along with hundreds of child abuse pictures. Brooks gave no comment during a police interview but admitted she ‘couldn’t argue’ about being attracted to children. Miss Mulvanny said: ‘Brooks knew the girl was underage but sent her sexual messages. The defendant originally pretended to be a 14-year-old boy but soon admitted her real age.’

OK I’ll just say this.

The photo loaded later than the rest of the page.

The comic timing was perfect.

That’s all kinds of fucked up.

Clicked on this thread and physically threw myself away from that picture.

I thought I had peaked. I hadn't.

Holy shit...

Oh God, I really can't take much more of this.

I just...I can't even with this....

When the fuck will this ridiculous nonsense stop????

So, even if the male born transperson impersonates a boy to victimize a child, 'she' retains the right of female pronouns in the press? In statistics and prison facilities - will 'she' also be treated as 'female'?

This is not sustainable and the people won't stand for it. If the elites don't do a 180° this will end in barricades and pitchforks, 1789 style.

MAN PREDATOR MALE PAEDOPHILE HE

And I thought my chin hair problem was bad...

Fucking grim male grooms childen online.

What's with all the "she"???

"Brook’s lawyer Robert Harding claimed much had changed in the time his client had been behind bars and she had struggled to understand social media and online networking."

Yeah, right.
Suppose it must be confusing for this person (would I get banned for saying "him"???)
Everyone seems to support and encourage their right to lie about one aspect of themselves, yet not their age.

The headline changed as did some of the body of text when I clicked on to another story. 'Woman' is now changed to 'Transgender' and a lot of the 'her's and 'she's have been omitted. There's been an obvious re-write since it was first posted an hour ago which is interesting.

deepwatersolo you raise a very interesting point.

Why is this a woman impersonating a boy?

Why is it not a man impersonating a woman (impersonating a boy), or otherwise simply a boy, because it’s a person who identifies as a boy?

Where is the line?

Mumsnet would you now ban or delete someone if they said this person is clearly a man?

or otherwise simply a boy, because it’s a person who identifies as a boy? Where is the line?

Exactly.

I thought I had peaked. I hadn't.

ditto

And which prison is this person in I wonder?

Wtf?

Yeah mumsnet, if we deny this person is a boy, then what?
If we deny the person is a woman, then what?

Do we have to call the person a boy-woman?

Anyone know what he did the first time round? 13 years served is a very long sentence.

Brooks, who was previously known as Duncan Smart, has previously faced the courts for having sex with someone who is underage and child abuse

Although I am glad that they have reported it this way because it very clearly shows the whole thing up for what it is. I'm furious this could be recorded as a female crime

" I'm furious this could be recorded as a female crime"

could be? 100% for sure IS

HOW is it possible that this paedophile has even been allowed to be considered to identify as a woman - HOW?????

Will the crime statistics record this as a female crime now?

Crime stats and prison planning are swiftly going to become meaningless and impossible.