Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Are we a cult?

617 replies

CyclingSam · 11/08/2026 11:01

I keep reading that sex realists, of which I am one, are a cult. Perhaps a genderist could be so kind as to explain what a cult is, and why we qualify. Sometimes one of us calls them a cult too. Who has a better case, hmmm?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
GreyskySexRealistsky · 11/08/2026 13:46

KindViper · 11/08/2026 13:34

Here's an outside question, and one to which I genuinely don't know the answer.

What percentage of ardent, aggressive MNetters would ever dare to leave the reassuring echo-chamber and post their beliefs / start threads on other social media sites and see how they fare?
My guess is that they'd be - to employ the parlance of the youth today - 'owned' pretty quickly, and by other women as well.

Which, I suspect, is why they don't do it.

There is safety in remaining in your own little walled garden, since it never interferes with your cosy view that all women must think like you - and agree with you - simply because those immediately around you in the same walled garden do.
So, yeah, about those parallels to a cult...

Well, you'd be wrong. And you'll have to find a way to cope with that.
Many of us have posted on Reddit, for example, and been deleted.
Why?
Because it's the true definition of an echo chamber.
Here is not. How do we know that? Because you're here, posting inflammatory nonsense and everyone is letting your posts stand without deletion. Because the things you write do so much to help the sex realist position in ways that you probably can't even comprehend.

thegoodnews · 11/08/2026 13:46

Shedmistress · 11/08/2026 13:41

Sex realists can't or won't listen

What should 'we' be listening to exactly?

We've been asking for why and how men turn into women for at least a decade now, and not one person has ever explained so...please feel free to expain what it is we are missing.

CRACK THE FUCK ON...

Edited

Like I said you can't or won't listen because if you could you would know my last post said why.

Your dogma is preventing you from hearing anything.

Pingponghavoc · 11/08/2026 13:46

I used to post regularly on reddit, including on a 'debate' sub with trans people.

Thats until the subs were closed or banned from discussing feminism and safeguarding.

Im still on a more private forum with some of these people. The thing that strikes me is the trans people I talk to want somesort of gatekeeping because the last thing they want is to be alone with the majority of vocal TRA. These ones who have no sense of safeguarding, viper.

Shedmistress · 11/08/2026 13:47

KindViper · 11/08/2026 13:34

Here's an outside question, and one to which I genuinely don't know the answer.

What percentage of ardent, aggressive MNetters would ever dare to leave the reassuring echo-chamber and post their beliefs / start threads on other social media sites and see how they fare?
My guess is that they'd be - to employ the parlance of the youth today - 'owned' pretty quickly, and by other women as well.

Which, I suspect, is why they don't do it.

There is safety in remaining in your own little walled garden, since it never interferes with your cosy view that all women must think like you - and agree with you - simply because those immediately around you in the same walled garden do.
So, yeah, about those parallels to a cult...

This is genuinely hilarious.

'We' used to be able to say that sex was binary then virtually every social media organisation banned us, doxxed us, threatened us, reported us etc etc etc, and even on here complained about us and forced all threads into one board...that 'we' then get accused of never leaving because every thread about this gets shoved back here like some sort of twilight zone invisible hand...and then 'we' get accused of never leaving this 'walled garden' and on and on and on.

But feel free to explain what it is we are missing, how does a man turn into a woman?

BackToLurk · 11/08/2026 13:48

GreyskySexRealistsky · 11/08/2026 13:46

Well, you'd be wrong. And you'll have to find a way to cope with that.
Many of us have posted on Reddit, for example, and been deleted.
Why?
Because it's the true definition of an echo chamber.
Here is not. How do we know that? Because you're here, posting inflammatory nonsense and everyone is letting your posts stand without deletion. Because the things you write do so much to help the sex realist position in ways that you probably can't even comprehend.

[Reddit is] the true definition of an echo chamber.
Here is not. How do we know that? Because you're here, posting inflammatory nonsense and everyone is letting your posts stand without deletion.

This. To be repeated at every accusation of MN being an echo chamber.

KatyKan · 11/08/2026 13:48

not unlike pro lifers & their obsessive 'fetal' worship.
Cor! That's a new one.

chirrupybird · 11/08/2026 13:50

CyclingSam · 11/08/2026 11:01

I keep reading that sex realists, of which I am one, are a cult. Perhaps a genderist could be so kind as to explain what a cult is, and why we qualify. Sometimes one of us calls them a cult too. Who has a better case, hmmm?

I'd never heard of sex realists, who do you worship in your cult?

Shedmistress · 11/08/2026 13:50

thegoodnews · 11/08/2026 13:46

Like I said you can't or won't listen because if you could you would know my last post said why.

Your dogma is preventing you from hearing anything.

What is it I am supposed to hear?

MarieDeGournay · 11/08/2026 13:51

KindViper · 11/08/2026 13:34

Here's an outside question, and one to which I genuinely don't know the answer.

What percentage of ardent, aggressive MNetters would ever dare to leave the reassuring echo-chamber and post their beliefs / start threads on other social media sites and see how they fare?
My guess is that they'd be - to employ the parlance of the youth today - 'owned' pretty quickly, and by other women as well.

Which, I suspect, is why they don't do it.

There is safety in remaining in your own little walled garden, since it never interferes with your cosy view that all women must think like you - and agree with you - simply because those immediately around you in the same walled garden do.
So, yeah, about those parallels to a cult...

Lovelyview beat me to it - MNetters do engage with other SM sites, and if they post anything that hints at sex realism gets them banned.
Not even 'owned, but banned.

You are mistaken if you believe that there's any kind of fair, balanced, grown-up, back-and-forth between people like me who believe that human sex is binary and immutable, and people who believe that it's possible to transition from one to the other.

The latter are the ones who do the banning and name-calling and threatening.

BackToLurk · 11/08/2026 13:52

I'm in the fortunate position of not having to watch what I say publicly. Many women are not. I post fairly regularly on public pages on Facebook. I occasionally have comments deleted - nothing abusive, just old-fashioned men aren't women stuff. What I can say is the deletions occur far less frequently than they used to, and more people are much more confident about expressing and supporting a broadly GC position in public.

Igneococcus · 11/08/2026 13:52

BackToLurk · 11/08/2026 13:36

If we are, is there a dress code? I feel like this is crucial. I’d propose no crocs.

Boily will be here soon to have words with you heathen.

I'm still baffled how being a "realist" has become something negative to some people.

chirrupybird · 11/08/2026 13:52

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · 11/08/2026 11:25

If this helps at all.
I've now read multiple times from the Be Kind crowd that trans was accepted in the past before JKR and Musk radicalised TERFery from niche culture war to full on right wing bigotry.
Yes, just a couple of decades ago, women welcomed trans women in, men had no objections.
Not always plain sailing, but the arrow of history on minorities meant that we were becoming more and more understanding, as seen by the legalisation of same sex marriage and Pride becoming mainstream.
And then the backlash started, Brexit to Trump to Farage to the demonization of Stonewall, and what was fast minimizing stigmatization of trans escalated the other way.
...a totally bogus rewriting of history, but explains why it's GC and TERFs that are seen as the cult, that the silent majority were/are totally cool with the trans narrative,

Where did Brexit come into it?

WallaceinAnderland · 11/08/2026 13:53

We weren't the ones who opened with #nodebate

Igmum · 11/08/2026 13:54

BackToLurk · 11/08/2026 13:36

If we are, is there a dress code? I feel like this is crucial. I’d propose no crocs.

I am currently wearing Crocs - does this mean I can’t be part of the cult?

Also is it Googledocs that invents random Adjective-Animal names for people contributing to shared docs? No particular reason for asking…

BunfightBetty · 11/08/2026 13:54

GreyskySexRealistsky · 11/08/2026 13:46

Well, you'd be wrong. And you'll have to find a way to cope with that.
Many of us have posted on Reddit, for example, and been deleted.
Why?
Because it's the true definition of an echo chamber.
Here is not. How do we know that? Because you're here, posting inflammatory nonsense and everyone is letting your posts stand without deletion. Because the things you write do so much to help the sex realist position in ways that you probably can't even comprehend.

Exactly! Instead of mashing the report button and crying to MNHQ about feeling 'triggered' or 'unsafe' because somebody disagrees with me, I'm sat here having a right old laugh at the ridiculous hilarity of Kind Viper's nonsense posts.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 11/08/2026 13:54

BackToLurk · 11/08/2026 13:52

I'm in the fortunate position of not having to watch what I say publicly. Many women are not. I post fairly regularly on public pages on Facebook. I occasionally have comments deleted - nothing abusive, just old-fashioned men aren't women stuff. What I can say is the deletions occur far less frequently than they used to, and more people are much more confident about expressing and supporting a broadly GC position in public.

Yes, same here. Under my own name too, in a lot of cases. I am not ashamed of my position on women's rights.

"Which, I suspect, is why they don't do it."
It's a bit weird that @KindViper seems to know who we are and what we do or don't do.

CassOle · 11/08/2026 13:58

Of course, I am happy to say that mammals can't change sex IRL. I am happy to specify that Human Beings are mammals too.

People can call it a 'dogma' if they like, but they would be wrong. It's just the reality of mammals. Plus, as I said, if I was ever presented with evidence that proved that mammals can go through a natural metamorphosis that changes their sex, then I would be happy to give that example when discussing the biology of mammals.

Shedmistress · 11/08/2026 13:58

Wishesandhorses · 11/08/2026 11:25

Seriously, you could intentionally share a word here on Monday, repeat it a lot, and by Friday it's been acquired and DARVOed by activists as the New Thing to Say. It's been done. (I particularly enjoyed 'coy' week.)

The term cult is one with a meaning and a clear definition, and a list of points to identify it. Easily Googled. You'd need a very big crowbar to get women wanting and needing to retain sex based rights and protections in law to fit under any of them. (Transactivism on the other hand ticks a whole lot more boxes).

So no. It's just more nonsense.

Edited

First rule of 'MAGIC MADE UP WORD CLUB TO PWN THE ACTIVISTS IS DO NOT TALK ABOUT MAGIC WORD CLUB'

FUCKS SAKES

quantumbutterfly · 11/08/2026 14:00

Igneococcus · 11/08/2026 13:52

Boily will be here soon to have words with you heathen.

I'm still baffled how being a "realist" has become something negative to some people.

Reality is apparently a cult.

KindViper · 11/08/2026 14:01

Thank you to those few of you who have made a genuine effort to answer my query about posting elsewhere on the internet.

I'm sad to hear your experiences were instant bans (obviously, I've no way to tell if that's true or not, so have to take what you're saying in good faith). That is not the outcome I'd have preferred for you. The preferred outcome, obviously, would be to have left those threads active and allow debate to flourish...

...which segues neatly to the next point, since I can already predict the reactions of many of the less capable regulars here to this post.

There has been much reference to Reddit. Not just on this thread, but I've seen it constantly and consistently used in weaponised whataboutery across this area of MN ("yeahbutyeahbutyeahbut Reddit", "Reddit are worse times ten", "At least we're not Reddit", etc.).
Unfortunately, this is not quite the 'gotcha' some of you seem to think it is, so I'll state here and now, very plainly for the slower children at the back, nobody - absolutely nobody - is suggesting Reddit is a bastion of balanced, informed discourse. Indeed, it's often worse than this particular area of MN, but the salient point here is that you are both cut from the exact same cloth.

I close as I opened, by saying again that it's unfortunate that those who did attempt to post elsewhere had their posts/threads/accounts/whatever banned for doing so; I imagine it unfortunately only reinforces the pervading, obsessive attitude here that anything not MN - and Reddit especially - is evil, or misguided, or beyond the enlightenment some of you genuinely seem to think you've achieved.

Again, that pesky cult parallel...

BackToLurk · 11/08/2026 14:05

KindViper · 11/08/2026 14:01

Thank you to those few of you who have made a genuine effort to answer my query about posting elsewhere on the internet.

I'm sad to hear your experiences were instant bans (obviously, I've no way to tell if that's true or not, so have to take what you're saying in good faith). That is not the outcome I'd have preferred for you. The preferred outcome, obviously, would be to have left those threads active and allow debate to flourish...

...which segues neatly to the next point, since I can already predict the reactions of many of the less capable regulars here to this post.

There has been much reference to Reddit. Not just on this thread, but I've seen it constantly and consistently used in weaponised whataboutery across this area of MN ("yeahbutyeahbutyeahbut Reddit", "Reddit are worse times ten", "At least we're not Reddit", etc.).
Unfortunately, this is not quite the 'gotcha' some of you seem to think it is, so I'll state here and now, very plainly for the slower children at the back, nobody - absolutely nobody - is suggesting Reddit is a bastion of balanced, informed discourse. Indeed, it's often worse than this particular area of MN, but the salient point here is that you are both cut from the exact same cloth.

I close as I opened, by saying again that it's unfortunate that those who did attempt to post elsewhere had their posts/threads/accounts/whatever banned for doing so; I imagine it unfortunately only reinforces the pervading, obsessive attitude here that anything not MN - and Reddit especially - is evil, or misguided, or beyond the enlightenment some of you genuinely seem to think you've achieved.

Again, that pesky cult parallel...

You're still here then? Cults: Well-known for embracing diversity of opinion.

Bit embarrassed for you TBH.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 11/08/2026 14:06

This rubbish ^ accusing us of not posting on other platforms reminds me of Omid Djalili's tweet a few years ago about western feminists apparently not standing up for women in Iran
"GC feminists! Where are you? Where are your voices?"

He totally failed to comprehend that he had blocked loads of those same "GC feminists" because he didn't like their feminist opinions on other matters. Then complained he wasn't hearing them.

The same is happening here. Pro-women supporters are blocked on other social media for speaking the factual truth and then ignorant posters claim we are saying nothing elsewhere.

To me, that's the very definition of "comfortable" - to make sure all your opponents have no voice. That you aren't faced with opinions you don't like. A true walled garden, if you will.

CassOle · 11/08/2026 14:07

'..which segues neatly to the next point, since I can already predict the reactions of many of the less capable regulars here to this post.'

Less capable regulars.
What an unkind thing to write.

KindViper · 11/08/2026 14:09

CassOle · 11/08/2026 14:07

'..which segues neatly to the next point, since I can already predict the reactions of many of the less capable regulars here to this post.'

Less capable regulars.
What an unkind thing to write.

Unkind, certainly, but undeniably accurate.

As evidenced in abundance.