David Tennant seemingly hates women

[Loveaghost]

Just seen David Tennant on The Assembly. Might be a repeat not sure. Flabbergasted that in response to a question about supporting transwomen in women’s spaces he said people need to ‘stop the hatred’, step aside and ‘let people just be.’ (Imagine that being said in his over the top faux ‘man of the people’ manner.)

He was then asked a question about making Good Omen’s 3 when Neil Gaiman has been ‘cancelled’ due to the light issues of being accused of Sex trafficking and rape of women. Here, he simply said he couldn’t ’leave people on a cliffhanger’ and moved on.

So, he’s happy to literally line the pockets of (very alleged) male rapists whilst at the same time arguing women not letting men in their spaces is hatred.

Fuck David Tennant.

It's all self-serving rubbish based on his own gratification, rather than anything with any merit.

Your anger and hatred of women is leading to irrational thinking. You are driven to knee jerk respones but sadly they only show up the paucity of your argument. The harder you try, the fewer you convince.

I pity you. It must be hard to live with such hatred and denial.

Until soneone can give a coherent, from first principles case for why transwomen are the same as people of female body, there is no basis to lump them in with people of female body than male.

And no one will ever be able to make that case because transwomen will always be people of male body rather than female.

The only way you get what you want is by dehumsnising, objectifying, reducing and disempowering female people. By denying our own knowledge of our own lives.

Yes, it's the same old sexism. We, the female people on the end of it as we always have been see it clearly even if you cannot.

I want to be someone who is guaranteed single sex provision but the likes of DT are aiming to prevent that. So why isn’t he letting me and everyone who also agrees with me, be?

Do you understand safeguarding at all? Do you understand why women have a separate changing room to men? If 99% of sex offenders are men - and that includes men who identify as women - what recommendations would you make regarding male and female changing rooms to reduce the risk to women of a sexual offence taking place?

Being convinced he’s right is a problem, though, because it means he can’t rethink, can’t reevaluate his opinions and can’t accept that others have opinions that might be more persuasive and that his own might be mistaken.

His comment about critics of the transgender community being “a tiny bunch of little whinging fuckers who are on the wrong side of history, and they’ll all go away soon.” Is revealing.

Wow
Any man or person who says that is vile.

"whinging little fuckers on the wrong side of history"
And hoped that they'd all be dead soon anyway"

Disgusting man.

Oh dear. This is embarrassing.

Not understanding how principles work is indeed very embarrassing.

The principle is no males in female spaces.

The fact you’re struggling to grasp that is a you problem.

None of this screed substantively addresses anything I said…..probably because you can't.

He did not say they will all be dead soon, he said they’ll all go away soon. And in respect of Kemi Badenoch, he said “However until we wake up and Kemi Badenoch doesn’t exist anymore — I don’t wish ill of her, I just wish her to shut up — whilst we do live in this world I am honored to receive this.”

“This” being the British LGBT award

This makes sense.

Any biological males, no matter whether they identify as 'women', or anything else, should NEVER be in women's spaces.

Thanks.

Incredibly vile man.

OMG. We aren't even speaking the same language. Not sure if you don't understand your inconsistencies in terms of applying your principle or won't acknowledge them. Either way, it's no wonder rational people won't debate GC's.

Which bit is difficult for you to understand? Do you not know what a 'male' is and what a 'female' is?

Or “rational”.

Keeping males out of women’s spaces is an entirely consistent stance.

We have sex segregated spaces, which is based on a long-held societal understanding of the risk between two groups of humans.

You are the one who wants to justify changing the groups, therefore it’s up to you to justify why the group of men you are championing should gain the privilege of moving spaces.

No other risk groupings have been taken into consideration, so throwing them randomly into the debate, as you are attempting to do, is irrelevant.

And if you think you can compare this to racial segregation, think again. The campaign to remove racial segregation was a campaign to remove that segregation. The current campaign is not to remove segregation, rather it’s an attempt to change the terms of that segregation, giving some people the special privilege of using opposite sex spaces, regardless of the negative effects on those who need them most, in this case, women.

The equivalent would have been white people claiming they were black and insisting that they must be given access to black peoples spaces, even though black people objected that this would make them feel unsafe.

Yes. This was a bizarre example to bring up in the OP.

I can't help it if you can't understand the law or plain English.

Yes ISTR that’s one of the claims made by women.

Where do you think he meant they’d go?

👏👏👏

This.

If you e.g. tell someone who’s bothering you, or a cat or similar to go away, shove off or get knotted, you’re not telling them to die, nor do you care where they go, so long as it’s a long way off.