David Tennant seemingly hates women

[Loveaghost]

Just seen David Tennant on The Assembly. Might be a repeat not sure. Flabbergasted that in response to a question about supporting transwomen in women’s spaces he said people need to ‘stop the hatred’, step aside and ‘let people just be.’ (Imagine that being said in his over the top faux ‘man of the people’ manner.)

He was then asked a question about making Good Omen’s 3 when Neil Gaiman has been ‘cancelled’ due to the light issues of being accused of Sex trafficking and rape of women. Here, he simply said he couldn’t ’leave people on a cliffhanger’ and moved on.

So, he’s happy to literally line the pockets of (very alleged) male rapists whilst at the same time arguing women not letting men in their spaces is hatred.

Fuck David Tennant.

A massively over-rated luvvie publicly defending men who want access to women's spaces and supporting the chemical castration of gay children.
Contemptible knob.

It's about MALE vs female.

Nothing to do with 'trans' people.

There are two sexes, not three.

I couldn't even read the book. Only got to 50 pages and gave up. Turned me into a zombie every time I tried to read it.
Can't stand David Tennant.

Again, this is not about lesbians vs straight women.

This is about MALE vs FEMALE. DV and RAPE proves that MALES are a big risk in a way that female vs female is not. Stop playing linguistic games and desperately separating the sexes into tinier and tinier and tinier subgroups in a desperate effort to show that males are not a risk factor to females. You must know that it won't work.

Restricting access to female only safe intimate single sex change rooms and toileting facilities for safety as well as privacy and dignity is what is suggested because there is a reason our fore feminists fought for it a century ago, in the first place! Those reasons have not changed since a century ago. If anything, with the rise of violence against women and the rise of dangerous and hardcore porn in the public realm, the reasons for for restricting male access to vulnerable females exist now more than they ever did!

I feel sad for his child, who seems to be used as an accessory to promote DT.
DT is very self absorbed.

@Limoncellospritzz we know from the Ministry of Justice data that (as of December 24) there are 151 transwomen in prison in England and Wales with convictions for sex crimes. This is hardly an insignificant number.

We have decades of evidence to prove that men are at least five times more likely to be violent than women. This is why women created our own single sex spaces.

If transmen really are men, then we'd expect to see around 800 to 1000 transmen in prison with convictions for sex crimes.

How many are there?

It's a it of leap to say he hates women based on that. Also, charges against Gaiman were dismissed.

What an absolutely revolting thing to say about multiple rape accusations.

Whatever money NG got for that final installment won't be that significant compared to the wages of all the production staff and extras who were expecting months of work. I'd say refusing to be in the final episode would just be virtue signalling, presumably you also think Michael Sheen, Derek Jocobi, Gloria Obianyo, Liz Carr etc also hate women for being in the show?

No group carries a substantially higher risk to females, than males.

And there is nothing you can do to answer that one. Nothing. You have no answer, no comeback to that, and you know it, so you desperately flail about trying to decrease people into ever smaller and smaller subgroups of a sex to attempt to make a point. You just look desperate and silly. It won't work. And you know it. Males carry a substantially higher risk to females than females do.

Foxes carry a substantially higher risk to hens than hens do to hens.

More nonsense TRA logic 🙄🙄

Nice try at white washing the broad smears targeted at trans women as being only about risk factors for single spaces when we both know the dehumanising mocking applies regardless.

MN, X & Facebook are cess pools of ridicule & degradation of transpeople period that exists irrespective of single sex spaces.

What you are asking for is that we give the men who are trans women special access that the men who are not trans women don't get.

What I'm saying is you lack consistency in applying your risk principle as mentioned upthread.

Are all trans women deluded? I don't know. But 100% certainly all trans women are sexist, because the belief that the fundamental and defining difference between men and women is that our minds are different, and all the shit that happened and happens to female people because of our physical sex isn't relevant to being a women or to the existence of women's spaces and women's rights is sexist as fuck.

The idea that only the body & not the mind would have evolved with a reproductive function is scientifically illiterate. Yes, men & women overlap psychologically but also vary.

And homophobes. They always try to drag in 'but-but-but-but-but whatabout tha lesbianz!!!'. Which says a lot about the homophobia that they even think like that. Let alone actually write it down.

Yes exactly. You are doing the trans debate no favours with this approach @Loveaghost

Yep. Once the original authors words stop (in the case of Good Omens , Terry Pratchett's input made the book better), the story loses authenticity. (I feel the same way about Call The Midwife - slight digression, but the books were very good imo).

Female on female violence is not even REMOTELY the same as male on female violence.

Keep digging.

You are being inconsistent unless you restrict access to all increased risk groups which you won't so save the hypocritical justification.

the trans population is too small to make any meaningful statistical conclusions about.

😂😂

This is desperation now. Complete and utter desperation.

Yes, I'm not convinced at all that the child is truly that way, rather than DT talking the child into it. It's rarely the child's choice.

The one lacking consistency, is you.

We say consistently that males, regardless of how they identify, are a risk threat.

You say that males who identify as women are no longer a risk threat.

You change the goal posts continually and have no consistency whatsoever.

We restrict women's single sex spaces to women. All women are allowed in. No men are. Because they're women's spaces, not men's.

That's it.

Wanging on about irrelevant issues and trying to shoehorn in data that isn't relevant doesn't fool anybody and just makes you look like a self-serving dimwit.

No males in the ladies.

That's all you need to know and abide by.

No there are two groups in society. Male, and female.

We restrict males from females. No matter the identity, sexuality or circumstance.

That, is consistent.

You want to decrease into tinier and tinier and tinier sub risk groups to justify your inconsistency, hypocrisy and goalpost shifting.

ALL MALES are restricted from FEMALES.

It's that simple and consistent.

He was 10 when he "came out" as non binary. Now 12 he is touted all over SM by his parents as "Trans".
Poor kid.

This^
and having a trans child doesn’t excuse his behavior, he could advocate for trans right sensibly and respectfully.

Oh dear. This is embarrassing.

You're really struggling with how to apply data and evidence, think critically, and form a cogent, well-reasoned argument, aren't you.

The relevant data here is the male offending rate and the data that shows assaults on women rise significantly in mixed sex spaces, compared to female-only spaces.

That's what we risk manage on.

That's aside from us keeping males out of our spaces for privacy and dignity issues. Which are also important.

It's the law that males stay out of female spaces. You writing silly half-baked posts on here won't change it.