Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

David Tennant seemingly hates women

223 replies

Loveaghost · 24/06/2026 23:47

Just seen David Tennant on The Assembly. Might be a repeat not sure. Flabbergasted that in response to a question about supporting transwomen in women’s spaces he said people need to ‘stop the hatred’, step aside and ‘let people just be.’ (Imagine that being said in his over the top faux ‘man of the people’ manner.)

He was then asked a question about making Good Omen’s 3 when Neil Gaiman has been ‘cancelled’ due to the light issues of being accused of Sex trafficking and rape of women. Here, he simply said he couldn’t ’leave people on a cliffhanger’ and moved on.

So, he’s happy to literally line the pockets of (very alleged) male rapists whilst at the same time arguing women not letting men in their spaces is hatred.

Fuck David Tennant.

OP posts:
Okiedokie123 · 25/06/2026 21:17

HumberSquid · 25/06/2026 07:07

Lol since when has being convinced you're right been a problem? Certainly isn't on this board.

Because he is wrong! 😂

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/06/2026 21:20

IsThisTheReaLife · 25/06/2026 19:44

I dont think DT is a good actor. He is shouty.

I think in Rivals he is too much pantomime villian.

In Dr Who, he was great at promoting the show...but acting ....hmm...

I agree he’s too pantomimey as Tony B but I’m still enjoying it. I’ve seen him play malevolent parts quite well. Dr Who leaves me cold whoever it is.

Bertiebiscuit · 25/06/2026 23:38

Lurkingandlearning · 25/06/2026 19:56

He is just a man who pretends to be other men for a living. Why actors' opinions are sought about anything other than their craft I really don't know. Who cares what they think. Just put on a good show, bank the money and fuck off.

In truth he always "acts" as a shouty impotent old twerp, so not really acting is he

Seethlaw · 26/06/2026 06:20

CaesarAugusta · 25/06/2026 18:37

Tennant did not say that "feminists like Kemi shouldn't exist any more". He said that "acknowledging that everyone has the right to be who they want to be... should be common sense" - which is surely correct - and his remarks about Badenoch not existing had nothing to do with her being a feminist (and she obviously isn't). They were made in the context of her denying people's right to be who they want to be, which, goodness knows, she does in a number of contexts, not just the trans one. Essentially he wants to live in a world where people don't have those views. He is certainly not advocating for mass extermination of bigots.

As for suggesting that he is criticising Badenoch because she is a feminist, how would you square that with her view that maternity pay is taking from one group of people and giving to another and is excessive, and her wish to scrap the Public Sector Equallity Duty?

He said that "acknowledging that everyone has the right to be who they want to be... should be common sense" - which is surely correct

Woof! There's no way at all this is gonna go wrong. Let's see...

  • "I identify as a thief."
  • "I identify as an embezzler."
  • "I identify as a corrupt politician."
  • "I identify as an incompetent professional."
  • "I identify as a pedophile."
  • "I identify as a murderer."
Surely no one would ever utter those words (or equivalent statements) if they were told that they would get support for it, right?

Essentially he wants to live in a world where people don't have those views.

Definition of "bigot" according to Merriam-Webster:

a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices
especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership

Wishesandhorses · 26/06/2026 08:49

Try telling him you identify as someone who wants and needs sex based rights, single sex spaces, and understands that sex is immutable, and watch that 'everyone' suddenly get exposed for the lie it is.

Bertiebiscuit · 26/06/2026 09:14

ElenOfTheWays · 25/06/2026 01:20

Not exactly. The lawsuit was dismissed with the judge saying it was the wrong jurisdiction and it ought to take place in New Zealand
He cannot be "cleared" as there were no criminal charges.
Most people seem to think he's guilty though as other incidents have been revealed since.

He's one of the "men can do what they like, women must do what men tell them" brobrigade

DramaAndBullshit · 26/06/2026 10:33

Seethlaw · 26/06/2026 06:20

He said that "acknowledging that everyone has the right to be who they want to be... should be common sense" - which is surely correct

Woof! There's no way at all this is gonna go wrong. Let's see...

  • "I identify as a thief."
  • "I identify as an embezzler."
  • "I identify as a corrupt politician."
  • "I identify as an incompetent professional."
  • "I identify as a pedophile."
  • "I identify as a murderer."
Surely no one would ever utter those words (or equivalent statements) if they were told that they would get support for it, right?

Essentially he wants to live in a world where people don't have those views.

Definition of "bigot" according to Merriam-Webster:

a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices
especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership

I identify as a fit healthy 25 year old millionaire.

<waits for the magic to happen>

Seethlaw · 26/06/2026 10:52

DramaAndBullshit · 26/06/2026 10:33

I identify as a fit healthy 25 year old millionaire.

<waits for the magic to happen>

Oh, same! I mean, being a fit healthy 25 year old millionaire is certainly better than being a fat sick 50 year old middle-class person, so it's only common sense to identify as the former rather than the latter, right?

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 26/06/2026 11:56

Can I identify as David Tennant, and recant all his gender-woo nonsense, please?

ProfessorBinturong · 26/06/2026 12:22

Seethlaw · 26/06/2026 06:20

He said that "acknowledging that everyone has the right to be who they want to be... should be common sense" - which is surely correct

Woof! There's no way at all this is gonna go wrong. Let's see...

  • "I identify as a thief."
  • "I identify as an embezzler."
  • "I identify as a corrupt politician."
  • "I identify as an incompetent professional."
  • "I identify as a pedophile."
  • "I identify as a murderer."
Surely no one would ever utter those words (or equivalent statements) if they were told that they would get support for it, right?

Essentially he wants to live in a world where people don't have those views.

Definition of "bigot" according to Merriam-Webster:

a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices
especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership

Well quite.

And the problem isn't only - or even primarily - with people wanting to be bad things. A friend of mine wanted to be a fighter pilot. He was colour blind, very short sighted with the attention span of a gnat and the reflexes of a distracted snail. He was also 8. Fortunately he was told 'Sorry, no.' rather than 'You have a right to be who you want.'

Seethlaw · 26/06/2026 13:34

ProfessorBinturong · 26/06/2026 12:22

Well quite.

And the problem isn't only - or even primarily - with people wanting to be bad things. A friend of mine wanted to be a fighter pilot. He was colour blind, very short sighted with the attention span of a gnat and the reflexes of a distracted snail. He was also 8. Fortunately he was told 'Sorry, no.' rather than 'You have a right to be who you want.'

Indeed!

Mind you, I still identify as an astronaut-that-should-have-been, after all those years... 😁

Bertiebiscuit · 26/06/2026 18:22

Waitwhat23 · 25/06/2026 20:38

It's like when that aching bawsack Willoughby talks about the 'old biddy mafia' or some such shite when referring to women who believe in women's rights. He's the best part of twenty years older than me.

(Fucks sake. Edited for spelling)

Edited

These fantasists not only pretend that men become women by popping on lippy, stilettos, fishnet tights and a pvc miniskirt but get a second "youth". As ever men think they became more desirable, ahem, and more important the older they get, while women over 30 are "crones" "hags" and "old bags" who should all shut up and make them a sandwich

Igmum · Yesterday 07:35

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/06/2026 01:28

As far as I'm concerned, the story of Crowley and Aziraphale ends with them sitting at a table in the Ritz, having just stopped the Apocalypse. There is no second or third series, just as there aren't any Metallica albums after Master Of Puppets.

Agree. And a nightingale sang in Berkeley Square. I am not waiting on tenterhooks for whatever distorted version of a third series they have come up with.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Yesterday 18:27

Limoncellospritzz · 25/06/2026 08:01

Hilarious.

You got caught out by not consistently applying your 'principles' & now you think you can shift the goal posts to toilets.

Keep digging.

The principle is that the group who make up 49% of the population, yet are responsible for 98+%of sexual offending and can leave their victims pregnant, are excluded from the spaces set aside for the 51% of people who can be made pregnant and commit less than 2% of sexual offending.

Are there any crimes that Muslims or lesbians are 50 times, that's 5000%, more likely to commit than the rest of us? I doubt it. Stop trying to pretend that the small differences in offending patterns between religious, ethnic, and sexual orientation groups in society are comparable to the vast differences between male and female offending.

Chrysanthemum5 · Yesterday 18:47

Thank you you’ve explained why it is a false comparison so well

Chrysanthemum5 · Yesterday 18:47

That was for @selffellatingouroborosofhate

Lovelyview · Yesterday 19:10

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Yesterday 18:27

The principle is that the group who make up 49% of the population, yet are responsible for 98+%of sexual offending and can leave their victims pregnant, are excluded from the spaces set aside for the 51% of people who can be made pregnant and commit less than 2% of sexual offending.

Are there any crimes that Muslims or lesbians are 50 times, that's 5000%, more likely to commit than the rest of us? I doubt it. Stop trying to pretend that the small differences in offending patterns between religious, ethnic, and sexual orientation groups in society are comparable to the vast differences between male and female offending.

This.

Theunchosenone · Yesterday 19:14

Limoncellospritzz · 25/06/2026 07:56

Are you trying to tell me lesbians carry out 99% of sexual offending?
Or that Muslims do?

No I'm telling you these groups carry substantially higher risk factors to the general population in these areas which by your logic should result in restrictions.

How do Muslims and lesbians carry substantially higher risk factors? Do try not to be Islamophobic or lesbophobic in your answer, there’s a pet.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Yesterday 23:24

HoppityBun · 25/06/2026 09:57

If you e.g. tell someone who’s bothering you, or a cat or similar to go away, shove off or get knotted, you’re not telling them to die, nor do you care where they go, so long as it’s a long way off.

Just quietly ignoring the bit where DT bemoaned Kemi existing. The only way she can cease to exist is by dying. He tried to back out in his next sentence because he realised that he'd said the quiet part out loud.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Yesterday 23:33

mrshoho · 25/06/2026 11:01

I remember a tv drama years ago where he was the lead. I can't remember the name just now but he played a controlling, dangerous, nasty husband. He played that character so well it frightened me.

It wasnae Secret Smile? It was striking how convincingly he played that part.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Today 00:07

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 25/06/2026 17:51

I know exactly what he said, and how you're misrepresenting it. He at no point said he hated women and I have seen no comment from him on spaces for women.

We have no safe spaces anyway, and there is virtually no justice for those of us (me included) who survived male violence. I was just reading how a young man was acquitted of killing a young girl despite stabbing her - once again, men can do what they want to us, without consequence.

I am sorry for all you've been through and hope you did get justice.

Tennant stood up for his kid, and the people who attack his child. He is angry that trans children suffer so much violence and hatred. That is not hating women.

Supporting your nb trans child is not misogyny.

We have no safe spaces anyway

Really? What the fuck do you think that Women's Aid provide?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Today 00:09

TheignT · 25/06/2026 18:11

Has he said she shouldn't exist because she's black? Haven't seen that. Has he said she shouldn't exist because she's a woman? Haven't seen that.

I'm a white woman and I shouldn't be threatened. My husband is a black man and he shouldn't be threatened. My daughter is a mixed race woman and she shouldn't be threatened. In fact no one should be threatened, although the quote of what he said doesn't sound like a threat to me. I don't see that her being black and a woman makes it any better or worse than if it was made to any of us unless she is claiming it was a hate crime in which case she should go to the police with her evidence.

He wouldn't have said that a white man shouldn't exist.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Today 00:11

Helleofabore · 25/06/2026 19:28

Gosh. Howse that work again?

I believe this is one of multiple threads people have pointed out the flaws in this argument. Yet you keep making it.

The issue is one of legitimate and illegitimate discrimination.

It is legitimate to discuss segregating single sex provisions based on sex categories of humans. It is not legitimate to segregate publicly accessible single sex provisions based on sexual orientation or religion.

Because while harm to female people for the purpose of excluding all male people above about 8 yrs old, do include physical harm, it also includes other harms as well.

There will always be some categories in the population that will have a small increased % of harm to the same sex of human using a single sex provision that they have the right to use based on their sex. The risk is not as great overall as allowing male people of any gender identity to use female single sex provisions.

Your argument is as flawed now as it was months ago.

Howse that work again?

I spotted the random italics earlier but for the life of me couldn't recall the name.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread