What is in the water this week?! Glinner now making a mockery of the cause

[RobynMiller]

I know I know I should just get off twitter but this week is just back to back GC news and not in a good way.

If you haven't seen, Glinner posted a video mocking Green Leader Zack Polanski, understandable plenty of material for a comedy writer there, but the video is so unhinged and unfunny.

Some speculating Graham was drunk when he made it but it's been 24 hours and he's left it up so maybe not.

I feel like we are finally gaining real ground in this fight and this makes GCs look like a bunch of lunatics.

I know there is no formal hierarchy but like it or not, for better and worse, we do have public faces and 'spokespeople' for this fight and this is just embarrassing.

I just feel so helpless because there can't be any accountability for this kind of thing but my God.

Thanks for listening to my rant, just been a very frustrating week.

Video here: https://x.com/Glinner/status/2047187374699126873?s=20

He is a MALE with male intersex 5-ARD you liar. He is a male, a man. No women are being bullied out of sport.

Did matey buy his broken phone from the same shop as that other chap (Scottish parliament, claimed a women had broken his quite clearly already broken brolly when he brandished it in her face) got his broken brolly?

Well well. Things looking up for Mr Linehan. Who needs a Bad Character whateveritwas when you can get SB on the witness stand in person. Nice job SV.

So Mr Linehan was innocent after all? Goodness me.

Will this be more red faces in the Met? Or should we be peering at the CPS a little more rigorously?

The Bad Character thingy, even if it wasn't formally accepted, can't have hurt. When you've got an extremely shifty witness coming up, it's worth pointing out that this is a shifty witness.

Very pleased Glitter's case was thrown out - really pissed off at the utter waste of court/police/CPS time spent on this drivel though. Also Glinner will have his costs paid - by the CPS, not the ghastly Tarquin. So tax-payer's money has ended up paying for this fiasco.
Time the police/CPS put a stop to this nonsense of vexatious cases.

Time for him to start working on his next grift then. Maybe he could stick some comedy false teeth in so you can all chuck money in his hat.

The only person grifting was Tarquin. Who probably would have split any winnings with Fat Tony, Fred and the Fox Killer.

Oh come on. There's lots of 'gardening' for our Graham on here.

If there weren't entirely ridiculous vexatious cases, gardening wouldn't be needed.

The dodgy ex copper and his male acolytes should realise that by now.

Don't recall any for this case - wasn't he supported by the Free Speech Union? I heard he's working again in the US anyways, so I doubt he'll need anyone's help. He may not be much of an impressionist but he's got serious track record as a comedy writer.

Brilliant typo, well done..

Supporting the harassment, misgendering and abuse of a someone who.was a child at the time tells me exactly who you are.

Tarquin's age seems to be a moveable feast, and when it comes to harassment and abuse he has an interesting track record.

It's not a coincidence that this delicate flower has tried to avoid being photographed at either of the trials.

tell me you haven’t read the court documents without telling me you haven’t read the court documents.

Please stop lying. That 'child' was stalking and harassing member of the public and shoving cameras in their faces. He is a menace. And supporting mis-sexing people, which can be dangerous for women, shows us who you are.

PS That 'child' was 17 years old when he stalked, harassed and abused members of the public. At 17 many are working full time jobs and/or at university. 17 is not a 'child'. You would have had the Jamie Bulger murderer kids let off because they were 10 years old so only 'children', going by that standard.

Harassing a kid (or any vulnerable young person) doesn't make you a hero, love.

Why have you dismissed this young man’s stalking, dishonesty and harassment in the need to portray him as a child?

When in fact, it is questionable that he was a ‘child’ at the time of the event where he was yet again harassing women?

Do you believe that someone who has directly lied saying he was a ‘detransitioner’ and that he was a female to male detransitioner, in the year or so beforehand is being truthful about any aspect of his life?

When someone demands that they be treated as if they are the sex category that they are not, why should any other information the give be considered trustworthy? That is what happens when people understand they should respect that someone is the opposite sex to what they are, people are suspicious of anything they say and

It really is something when a group has to rely on coercion in someway, shaming / hate crime threats / intimidation etc, to force people to start thinking of that group as truthful.

Now what group of people.argue 17 year olds aren't kids 🤔

The age of criminal.responsibility and age of vulnerability are different things, dude.

Weaponising poor James's suffering to justify your eagerness to bully a child is abject behaviour.

Child at the time of offence, vulnerable young adult at the trial.

Misgendering, harassing and participating in the abuse of Sophia is not heroic behaviour. It doesn't make you a feminist martyr, it marks you out as someone eager to kick down at a minorify.

Nothing about this horrendous online harassment, which you're clearly enjoying, is feminism.

Being vulnerable and a minor (if that was even true at the time) is also no excuse for a young male person to be allowed to continue to harass people.

Transphobic people are very much having their cake and eating it when it comes to Sophia.

You're all very much aware that she's been influenced (by the sounds of it, manipulated) by older people, but want to attack her as well.

It's the eagerness to treat the actions of a vulnerable kid like a true crime drama which stinks here.

Again, this is deeply unheroic behaviour and none of it is feminism. Everyone calling her by that pathetic name is just complicit in the online bullying of a vulnerable young adult.

But it's okay for adults to group together, bully and pursue her?.

She's not the one who was up in court.

Also, jfc get out more and cure your ignorance. Trans people exist, have done so without your permission forever and will continue to do so.

Being trans is normal. It doesn't make anyone dishonest, or a criminal.

Hating minorities is hating minorities, whatever justification you give yourself for it.

In what way is Sophia Brooks (Tarquin) a vulnerable young person?

He is on film harassing women at a conference, that film was shown to the judge in court this week.

He arrived in court with Stephanie Hayden, originally Anthony George Halliday, and is a harnesser and sexual predator. Hayden somehow in court on Friday ended up showing his knickers and arse to the court room. Adult Brooks hangs out with very dodgy men. …

SHE was a convenient target when no trans women were at the Olympics, and is a fantastic role model to Algerian girls. They look up to and respect her.

Calling her a man is racist and misogynistic af.