So far we have had just on the past couple of pages:
The men are going to attack anyway, why bother excluding a sub group then.
Some dads take their daughters into female toilets (just a note, they fucking should not be doing that either)
I think there was a dismissal in there of the harm that female people have actually reported in sports etc as being ‘imagined and random’.
Some women are masculine looking, so this will harm all women to exclude a group of male people.
Focus on the other men.
Don’t waste police time.
This group of male people are not as dangerous as the others (and ignores the MoJ evidence and safeguarding principles)
They are just a few.
This group are targeted for violence and are victimised (and apparently no other sub group of male people are).
They just want to pee in privacy.
Very weak arguments, some are simply completely flawed logically and evidence wise.
Then we have the emotionally manipulative tactics such as:
Hysteria, hate, imagined and random scenarios,
Must be another day ending in 'y'.