“A school faces a threat of legal action over policies that protect all children – so we’re fighting back.”

[SingleSexSpacesInSchools]

https://goodlaw.social/a8mo

the GLP are sort of the curse of bad luck so let’s see what happens…

also wanted to say well done to @SingleSexSpacesInSchools as this is the longest and most frustrating battle.

Who is ignoring the TIF?

The men who are pushing into womens spaces claiming that mens spaces are too dangerous him but totally safe for a TIF?

The TRA who are busy trying to BS (eg the US government) that men can grow babies and need mens health care to Abortion Rights?

The TRA who are removing the meaning of the word woman claiming it means some males and some females and also replacing woman with terms like Bleeder or Breeder?

The social change was not and is not a grass root movement. US money helped paid for the promotion of transgenderism in the UK. And its homophobic.

Stonewall runs its anti-LG policy to support transgenderism. Such that less than 5 years after the right to marry was legislated it is condeming Lesbians for saying she is only same sex attracted. Its still busy claiming heterosexual men are same sex gender attracted "women".

In the OPs childs school the men and women who are responsible for safeguarding the young girl in their care.

Its a male who is running that fundraise with the objective of forcing the OPs girl into having males in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block

The OPs child is being subjected to Bullying and subjected to Coercive Control. The fund raising is openly advocating for current Bullying and Coercive Control to continue.

You here on the OPs thread advocate to force the OPs girl to have males in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block

You dismiss the fact that the OPs child is the vulnerable party so too is the male involved in the fund raising.

You dismiss the fact that she has a right to be safeguarded by the school as is the male involved in the fund raising

You dismiss the fact that she has a lawful right to female only single sex provision in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
So is the male involved in the fund raising

Again reframing my question to the male child who is making demands because he has been taught that he Has A Right which places his wants above girls needs.

How should the school safeguard the male student who wants to access the female only single sex space in the context of his wanting access to
▪︎ the girls showers when the girls showers are being used by girls
▪︎ the girls changing room when the girls changing rooms are being used by girls
▪︎ the girls toilet block when the girls toilet block is being used by girls
such that the school ensure he is not subjecting any girl to non-contact child sex abuse or contact child sex abuse and ends up with a criminal record for sex offending?

This ^ is the theory the OPs childs school is trying to upsell to the OP and the OPs child (and society as a whole).

Multiple Agency who have safeguarding roles are giving the adults in charge a soft pass rather than holding the adults to account.

The management claim they will risk assess each male before enforcing the decision of forcing the OPs child to participate in their qualifying males wants.

I'll bet they will not want to apply the same risk weighting to any girl who asked to be placed in the male only single sex provision.

Its would be much harder to explain to a jury how any resulting sex offending etc could not have been prevented.

Therefore questions still remain to be answered:

How may girls can be subjected to avoidable sexual offending to warm your heart?

Or to reframe

How many male students can be put at risk of engaging in avoidable sex offending on the school grounds?

You continue to attempt to trigger me.

My only answer to you is the presence of a trans child or adult is not a sex offence.

Yes, there is the Supreme Court decision that specified sex for some contexts, but not all. Your beliefs extend far beyond the decision.

The irony is off the scale.

And as for the self quoting... 😂

I'm sorry for not knowing how this thing works.

So you agree we should stop all completely unproven drugs and surgery.

Fab. Glad we can agree on something.

You don’t have to read the thread you know.

I agree that non-trans people should not be receiving trans medical treatment.

Trans people exist. Trans people need medical treatment.

It's not trans people's responsibility to determine how to stop non-trans people from receiving treatment.

And it’s not teenage girls’ responsibility to strip in front of their male peer to validate their feelings.

Let's play a game of 'how do we decide who is trans and who is not'

The Tavistock failed miserably at this challenge.

Perhaps you can crack on and give us a definition of how we tell the difference between true trans and not trans in a scientific way that no one else before you who is medically qualified has managed so far.

Good luck.

I agree. No person should be forced to strip in front of any other person.

You continue to attempt to make this thread about you you you.

You cant answer the questions because if you did you have to also recognise that the OPs girl is a child with rights.

That the adults who have been tasked with safeguarding her in her school are openly failing to carry out their paid role.

The initial comments on X are almost universally critical. Many pointing out the predatory nature of his campaign to wedge boys into girls changing rooms. There's no holding back 😂

I will apologise to say I cannot believe your characterisation of the situation based on what I understand as gender critical beliefs.

88.1k views. Only 178 likes. #SadTimes

So why are you here on a thread supporting the school that requires its teenage girls to strip in front of their male peers?

Honestly do you even know what you’re arguing about?

I think this is the "butter wouldn't melt in his mouth" attitude. Of course he objects to one sex stripping in front of the other. But he believes one sex can become the other, so no inconsistency. And no sweat.

Men's sport, prisons, intimate care, locker rooms.

Where are all the trans identified women and girls clamouring to be included??

No-where.

And it's entirely unsurprising that you can't see what GC women are talking about.

You're the oppressor class trying to strip women of their rights. Your activism relies on it.

Men's sport, prisons, intimate care, locker rooms.

Where are all the trans identified women and girls clamouring to be included??

No-where.

And it's entirely unsurprising that you can't see what GC women are talking about.

You're the oppressor class trying to strip women of their rights. Your activism relies on it.

You are right about Trans men (I.e. females identifying as nen) playing rugby.

WOMANS RUGBY. Not mens. No hormones etc.
Just woman supporting other womankind, however they identify.

Well bless.

Are you are too busy doing you to realise the thread is discussing safeguarding the OPs girl?

That a male is running that fundraise with the objective of forcing the OPs girl into having males in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block

The OPs child is being subjected to Bullying and subjected to Coercive Control. The fund raising is openly advocating for current Bullying and Coercive Control to continue.

The objective is that a male has access to her while she in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
while ignoring that she has a lawful right to female only single sex provision.

The child has not given her consent yo that and the OP is not offering consent on behalf of his child.

Providing a sex offender with a child to offend against is a criminal offence.

If sex offending occurs the adults in the school (et al) tasked with safeguarding will claim that they did not knowingly provide the child.

Safeguarding around sexual offending is about reducing the schools risk of providing a sex offender with a child.

You advocating gor males to be given access to her:

"The fact that it was even allowed and culturally supported for any length of time warms my heart."

You also claimed
"There are some awful people in the world. I believe I would be able to spot a bad faith attempt at transition."

You recognise that sex offending is a possible outcome of the adults in the school forcing the OPs child into mixed sex provision.

Or are you going to claim that sex offending can not or will not happen in mixed sex provision?

If you even with your belief that you can spot the awful people admit that you dont actually trust that you could spot the sex offender 100% of the time why would the same limit not apply to the adults tasked with safeguarding?

These adults are openingly and in writing saying they are not in a position to formulate a lawful safeguarding policy.

So again

How may girls can be subjected to avoidable sexual offending to warm your heart?

Or to reframe

How many male students can be put at risk of engaging in avoidable sex offending on the school grounds?

You know it's not compulsory to be here right?? You can live up to your posting name and leave anytime you want

I don't want the job. I have no idea who or why someone is trans. Maybe medical science will work it out one day. If someone says they are trans I will support them as a trans person. If they decide they are not trans, I will support them as a non-trans person. It is all I can do.