I sat through a half hour session for a women's outdoor group last year.
The stated aims of the group were to help women, especially minority women, get into outdoor adventure and to try and talk about and over come the barriers women uniquely face.
The talk was about equipment design and use, coaching methods and how this often relates to women's physical size and strength compared to men, attitudes of men being macho and how this is off putting, attitudes of men to women in terms of sexualisation, biological barriers in terms of periods, women's safety, menopause, recovery after childbirth, talk about how women felt it hard to talk about someone of these very personal health issues relating to their bodies and sport in front of men, access to toilets when doing outdoor adventure, childcare, female specific health in terms of aging, bone strength etc religious considerations... Most of the talk focused on biology.
Then at the end they opened up to questions.
There were two men giggling like children throughout and I knew what was coming
"Can we join as transwomen?"
It was totally inappropriate and undermined everything we'd just listened to in the last half hour and the stated aims and purposes of the group.
Worse still guess what the talk prior to the women's one was? One about LGBT access to outdoor sports. So there WAS provision for transwomen but it was all about destroying the stated goals of the women's group in order to get validation.
This isn't about erasing transwomen. This isn't about attacking transwomen. This is about the unique bodily experiences and needs of females and a need to have a space to do this away from males. It's wholly inappropriate for males to go "well my estrogen induced body does this". It's about females talking about their shared experiences relating to their bodies. Experiences that even the transwomen on this thread admit they don't share - they say they have a different experience of 'menopause'. The point is the shared female experience not talking about how transwomen experience this differently.
The LGBT group for similar purposes is over there
--->
As I say it's not like transwomen were not being effectively provided for and represented. It was that the transwomen wanted to take over the women's group and render it pointless for many of the women who might have wanted to otherwise participate. Every minute talking about transwomen is a minute taken away from the women's experiences. And is of fuck all value to any of the women present. It's literally talking at women not women talking with women about shared experiences.
This is what gets to me - it's the inappropriateness and the selfishness where women lose out every time, even when there is a clear legitimate and perfectly fair, biologically related stated aim to have a women's only space whilst transwomen ARE catered for. You can't say transwomen were being excluded - the group just wasn't appropriate for transwomen under the stated aims.
This wasn't anti-trans in anyway.
The two transwomen wanging on, on this thread are utterly guilty of this same shit.
Selfish, navel, gazing me me me which has the singular objective of destroying the ability of women to talk about women's issues with women on women's terms. Women are not allowed to talk about themselves whilst transwomen ONLY talk about themselves and what they want.
The difference is stark.
It's wholly inappropriate, deeply misogynistic and grossly offensive.
Yet somehow we are still 'the bad guys'.
Except we really really aren't.
The men do all the work of showing up who really hates who.