Well, like Suzanne Moore, I have a working class Tory-voting mother. She's a lot more socially conservative than me, that's for sure, and we disagree on many issues - as I say, I've never voted for a right wing party in my life - but as the person who always taught me that regardless of who you vote for, women using our votes was essential (bc had suffragettes in the family, "women didn't tie themselves to railings for you not to use your vote" etc etc), she is certainly not a 'fascist', is working not middle class, abhors racism (esp the NF/BNP sort, and frankly had more negative to say about racists than lefties; she thinks lefties are unrealistic and not sensible) and unlike some supposedly more 'righteous and moral' posters here would find asking for sex tourism tips for which African countries to visit in order to find economically deprived "exotic lovelies" they can use for sex pretty fucking abhorrent on multiple fronts.
People have all sorts of reasons for voting the way they do.
It's generally both more intelligent and fruitful to exercise your curiosity to try to find out exactly why and where they're coming from than to blanket condemn those who vote differently from yourself, namecall ("fascists" "soulless") or make unevidenced claims about their moral characters. But I guess some here think that it is for them who, with their self righteousness and supposed (while wholly unevidenced) moral & intellectual superiority, to do the "educating" of others into their own way of thinking rather than deigning to "educate themselves" or even talk to anyone outside their own very narrow frame of reference. But then expect everyone else, those they clearly view as lesser mortals to be "shamed" into falling in line with their thinking.
Christ, it's embarrassing. Why would ANYONE trust such a person to be competent or knowledgeable enough to be able to inform government policy? Or to be even taken seriously in any way?