Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is it safety or separation?

660 replies

OneFlakyMaker · 20/09/2025 05:54

When opposing transgender people in women's spaces, are you looking for safe spaces or separate spaces?

They may overlap but are not the same thing, and while a lot of the discussion is focused on safety, the tone and some arguments hint that addressing safety won't be enough for many people to feel comfortable. Instead, a place without males is sought.

I read one woman described it "At the club we used the women's bathroom to get a break from interacting with men".

OP posts:
ArabellaSaurus · 23/09/2025 08:27

Ah, I see. Women used as training materials to help the poor confused men learn how not to be misogynist pricks. I didnt grasp that point.

Many men are quite capable of interacting with women without insulting them, or trying to lecture them.

Learn from them!

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 08:28

ArabellaSaurus · 23/09/2025 08:12

Hostility with an aftertaste of contempt.

In plain sight !

At least the constant repetitive links, emojis and such has disappeared.

ArabellaSaurus · 23/09/2025 08:29

If you really dont know of any decent men from whom you can learn basic standards of decent behaviour and how to interact with women, then just try to imagine that women are human beings with agency, life experience, and the same rights to self determination as men.

RedToothBrush · 23/09/2025 08:29

I don't think Howse realises we can spot an abusive male from the other side of the planet here.

We know what MRAs look and sound like.

We've had enough of them visiting MN to be able to recognise the pattern. They aren't new and they don't say anything original.

The TRAs who spout on about how we aren't feminist because we don't include male transwomen but sound EXACTLY like MRAs are a particular joy.

When you use the same tired tropes it's not exactly difficult.

Shortshriftandlethal · 23/09/2025 08:29

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 07:02

You tell me.

Please explain why women seek the company of women other than for safety? Why the desire if their discussions aren't any different from men's? Because their conversations only ever limited to their 'biological realities'?

Reality isn't convenient is it?

Lots of women also seek the company of men because they like men and get on better with men in certain ways. I also post on another specialist interest forum which is 99% male and have done for many years, as an example. I have male friends in 'real life' too. My gay male friends are often like a 'half way house' between my male and female friends in that some of our shared styles and approach to communication is similar as with female friends.......but

My longest standing female friends are those who I met when our children were babies, and we were brought together because of these shared circumstances. A combination of the commonality of life experience/perspectives and our shared substance ( being female) is what draws us to other women. Certainly for me.

Ultimately though, even with female friends we each have our own individual style and mode of communication, interest and friendship. Friendships can be built on all sorts of different foundations.

RedToothBrush · 23/09/2025 08:30

RedToothBrush · 22/09/2025 07:39

A timely reminder.

Only MRAs benefit in a discussion about the legitimacy of women's safety and think that comparisons with US civil rights and separation are fair and accurate parallels.

There is a reason for this.

If your argument is essentially that women and girls don't need safety, privacy and dignity from men you are either a creep, a perv or enabling one. Whichever it is, you hate women either openly or subconsciously because you have utter contempt for their needs.

There is no other place this discussion goes.

I think I need to repeat this post.

AGAIN.

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 08:32

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 08:24

What is also pretty basic stuff is that people who have never met or seen someone who is of a different race or sexual orientation will still have respect for those people.

Your point has been to consider that women wanting single sex groups (not provisions needed for safeguarding including privacy and dignity) are or at risk of becoming a separatist movement. Your point is one that relies on absolutism and it is flawed because of that.

And additionally, your point being one based on absolutism then places the blame on female people for male people’s poor behaviour towards female people. This is not only victim blaming, it crosses over into the abuser’s code.

Ultimately, it is not the responsibility of female people to improve male people’s behaviour. And it is not the responsibility of female people to restrict their needs or their choices in the way you have tried to defend on this thread and others to make male people better people.

It is the responsibility of male people to act with respect and there are so many opportunities for male people and female people to interact everyday.

That some people are arguing on the internet that some female people having access to some single sex groups while still interacting with male people on a daily basis should not be allowed because male people wil not know how to behave respectfully is an absurd notion. So much so that it is an abusive notion.

Just adding to my post.

Is it exposure to this board then that has meant you, personally, learned how to behave with respect in a space that is in the vast majority used by women?

Is that what changed how you interact so dramatically? Are you telling us that you are living proof of what contact with women achieves in improving someone’s behaviour? Or was it the punishment of deletions?

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 08:37

ArabellaSaurus · 23/09/2025 08:27

Ah, I see. Women used as training materials to help the poor confused men learn how not to be misogynist pricks. I didnt grasp that point.

Many men are quite capable of interacting with women without insulting them, or trying to lecture them.

Learn from them!

Indeed.

That was the informative nugget I found when reading the post from yesterday morning. I think most of us just skipped reading the post the first time around.

But it is indeed abusive to women.

Women, you cannot ever meet up without including male people because if you do, male people will treat you badly! And if you even think of it, you are ‘separatists’ and you need to be ashamed.

Our treasure chest of gems are overflowing with these latest threads.

Shortshriftandlethal · 23/09/2025 08:39

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 07:23

if your definition of 'legitimacy' is one in which people believe exactly what you say or tell them, regardless of what the the measurable evidence and facts say to the contrary, then no, there can be no legitimacy unless there is a universal acceptance of your premise. There isn't.

No. Legitimacy requires associations. So no, one can't claim to be a homosexual without having associations to homosexual behaviour.

The movement from one state to another is socially living as the opposite gender by making changes to one's body & social status.

That is superficial change... only at the level of social presentation and private psychological imagination. You cannot change the 'substance'. You cannot change your sex ( the hard drive). Nothing at the more superficial level is permanent or fixed. It is fluid and changes with time and experience. If you are trying to fix 'femininity' in place it will end up being nothing but an exaggerated performance like a set of clothes you put on each morning to achieve a particular impression of whatever is is you want to project that day. The clothes are nothing but a costume one wears to signal one's role or character in the social system or order.

.

TheKeatingFive · 23/09/2025 08:44

The movement from one state to another is socially living as the opposite gender by making changes to one's body & social status.

Lets break this down

socially living as the opposite gender

A meaningless phrase. How does one live 'as a woman'?

making changes to one's body

Changes, but none that actually brings anyone closer to being female. The end result is a changed male

social status.

Doesn't happen

So a complete non definition

Shortshriftandlethal · 23/09/2025 08:46

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 07:48

De transitioners aren't changing 'back' in personality rather in how far they want to embrace/express certain aspects of it.

'Being a woman' is not an expressive option or performance style. A woman is an adult human female and the only thing she shares with all other women are the facts of her biology.

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 08:46

The movement from one state to another is socially living as the opposite gender by making changes to one's body & social status.

People can have whatever ‘gender’ they want. They don’t move from one sex to another though. And if other people don’t want to recognise someone’s ‘gender’ there should be no enforcement of it.

Single sex provisions are not based on ‘gender’, they are based on the sex class that person belongs to. HTH

BlackeyedSusan · 23/09/2025 08:46

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/09/2025 06:24

They may overlap but are not the same thing, and while a lot of the discussion is focused on safety, the tone and some arguments hint that addressing safety won't be enough for many people to feel comfortable. Instead, a place without males is sought.

A place without males is key to securing that safety for women.

We don't want male free spaces because we think boy have cooties.

It's because they commit 100% of rapes and over 98% of all sexual assaults.

It's because they can physically overpower us.

It's because we can't tell which ones are dangerous and which ones are not until we have already been harmed.

And it's because, if we have already been harmed by a man, just being in a space like that with a member of the opposite sex is enough to re-traumatise us even if they don't actually do anything other than be there.

But you're right, safety is not the be all and end all of the argument. Safety is a good enough reason to keep all male people out of women's spaces. But so is, "We just want female only spaces."

Why is this so difficult for some people to understand? Women saying "no" should have been the end of the discussion.

Thank you.

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 08:49

ive just been sick.

I can’t believe it’s ok for that person to state that my violent rape and sa is my fault because of a lack of contact.

im beyond upset that the post is standing.

this person it’s a thought experiment and some sort of game to say more and more outlandish and ridiculous word salad and they don’t care about the impact on real women. Collateral damage. That’s all I am.

I struggle enough with feelings of worthlessness and self blame after my rape. What did I didn’t I should I have done. But to make it my fault because I want SSS? That’s just beyond me.

TheKeatingFive · 23/09/2025 08:51

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 08:49

ive just been sick.

I can’t believe it’s ok for that person to state that my violent rape and sa is my fault because of a lack of contact.

im beyond upset that the post is standing.

this person it’s a thought experiment and some sort of game to say more and more outlandish and ridiculous word salad and they don’t care about the impact on real women. Collateral damage. That’s all I am.

I struggle enough with feelings of worthlessness and self blame after my rape. What did I didn’t I should I have done. But to make it my fault because I want SSS? That’s just beyond me.

❤️

I'm so sorry.

There are genuinely no depths to which these ghouls won't sink to

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 08:55

TheKeatingFive · 23/09/2025 08:51

❤️

I'm so sorry.

There are genuinely no depths to which these ghouls won't sink to

Honestly. It’s so stark.

It’s my fault I got raped because women have single sex spaces.

And they don’t even have the guts to answer me. Because they know they have no answer.

But. Every single person who reads their posts now is going to see me going. You’re the one who told me my rape was my fault because women have single sex spaces.

That’s not a statement I’m going to let pass.

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 08:57

”now its become more acceptable that's why some are taking further steps to live their 'authenticity'.”

When I see sentences such as this one in relation to male people becoming ‘authentic’ women I really think authentic has become another one of those words that has been twisted to now mean the opposite to the intended and established meaning.

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 08:57

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 07:26

That female people want to spend time with other female people sometimes is hardly a cause for concern that those female people are seeking ‘separatism’ as part of a movement.

And psychological, behavioural & cultural commonalities is a meaningless tool for categorising humans as to who has access to single sex spaces or single sex provisions. I think it is clear that you have tried across multiple threads to articulate your point but fail because your point is irrelevant for the premise you are trying to defend.

Avoiding the question? Makes sense….

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 09:00

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 08:57

Avoiding the question? Makes sense….

I’ve not avoided any of your questions.

lets talk about how you say my rape and sa is my fault because women have single sex spaces. Go on. Let’s.

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 09:00

KitWyn · 23/09/2025 07:34

If I say I am gay/lesbian I am telling you that I am same sex attracted. I could be, and remain, celibate, for any number of reasons. Still gay/lesbian!

What are these "homosexual behaviours" you speak of? Are there also "womaning behaviours"?

Please list them, that would be very helpful to better understand your argument.

There's this thing called "physical attraction" that you don't necessarily need to 'act out' on others to prove you are.

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 09:02

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 07:38

I don’t believe you can parse ‘anti-trans hysteria’ in any way that doesn’t ultimately end up showing hostility towards the women and girls that are asking that sex is prioritised above gender when sex matters.

Interesting that you try though. However, if that had been all that you had posted, you might have been able to make that excuse. I don’t think anyone who has been on threads with you could doubt your hostility towards any woman who disagrees with you.

don't dehumanise & demonise trans people = "hostility towards the women and girls" 🤪

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 09:03

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 09:00

There's this thing called "physical attraction" that you don't necessarily need to 'act out' on others to prove you are.

But but but. You said my violent rape was my fault because of a lack of contact.

ive asked you to answer me. Please do.

ta.

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 09:04

Howseitgoin · 23/09/2025 09:02

don't dehumanise & demonise trans people = "hostility towards the women and girls" 🤪

I’ve never dehumanised any trans person

A man dehumanised me though, when he raped and sexually assaulted me. When he strangled me so hard I pissed myself.

Helleofabore · 23/09/2025 09:04

I hope you are ok. Taztoy

The post you refer to is DARVO. As you have picked up it really is victim blaming.

female people - we want to socialise away from male people.

male people - but then we won’t know how to treat you with respect. And you will be responsible for that.

female people - we need space to heal without you being there.

male people - then accept that we won’t treat you with respect and accept the consequences.

DARVO

Taztoy · 23/09/2025 09:04

Keep laughing at me @Howseitgoin I see you and you’re showing everyone else loud and clear.

The word is

NO