Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 3

1000 replies

IDareSay · 05/09/2025 11:51

These threads are currently being used to follow the case that is taking place at Westminster Magistrate's Court over the 4th and 5th September, but will also be following the subsequent fallout of Graham's arrest at Heathrow on his return to the UK for this court case earlier this week.

He is currently on trial for alleged harassment of a trans identified male and criminal damage to the man's phone. The charges stem from a series of events in October 2024 at Battle of Ideas.

Part 1 here

Part 2 here

Graham's account of the arrest here

You can support his Substack here

Free Speech Union are running a fundraiser to support a claim against the Met in reference to the Heathrow arrest. Just search FSU and Graham Linehan fundraiser and it should be easy to find. Currently reached 93% of its target.

Most of the mainstream media have reported on the case, but none have covered it as well as Nick Wallis. Follow him on X for live posting from the court.
You can support Nick here (posted this morning Friday 5th September):

"I am deeply grateful to everyone who has seen fit to bung me the cost of a coffee, a pint or even a bloody London pint since I found out I was able to come back today. If you think you can afford to make a small donation, there’s more info here:"

https://store29806256.company.site

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow | Mumsnet

Arrested again! Details on his Substack. This is beyond a joke; 5 armed officers! [[https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/i-just-got-arrested-again ht...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5403191-graham-linehan-arrested-on-arrival-at-heathrow?page=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
40
Ereshkigalangcleg · 06/09/2025 09:56

YY exactly @ThatCyanCat

bonfireoftheverities · 06/09/2025 10:06

EmeraldRoulette · 06/09/2025 02:34

@bonfireoftheverities what is security like there? And how busy was it? I would've thought it would be packed out now.

That's nice that you got to meet him. I'm surprised he doesn't go home and collapse in a heap. Honestly, I don't know how he is still standing - and that's before the airside arrest.

Bags in trays to be x-rayed, through a metal detector.

The back and forth with pronouns was great fun. Fortunately Graham was clear as a bell (except when he leaned back away from the microphone from time to time); the lawyers and judge much less so, which was annoying as there were speakers which I assume were meant to be more than wall decorations. You often had to strain to hear them, cursing every sound by your fellow spectators. Even someone getting lozenges out of a little tin turned heads.

DustyWindowsills · 06/09/2025 10:13

Llamasarellovely · 06/09/2025 09:23

No, his evidence is over, that's it. The other three defence witnesses can bring in their personal experience now but Glinner can't.

Julie Bindel and Kate Harris were present at the Battle of Ideas conference last year - just one of the events at which SB was getting in people's faces. Does anybody know if they have also been harassed by SB online? They may be able to corroborate GL's claim that SB's behaviour was widely seen as a cause for concern.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 06/09/2025 10:15

I imagine they are all going to testify to his allegedly harassing behaviour, Kate Harris spoke about him briefly in her chat with KJK.

Catiette · 06/09/2025 10:27

RedToothBrush · 06/09/2025 08:09

He sounded traumatised and his responses were one of a man who had been repeatedly harassed, he was aware of seven other people who had received the same type of harassment from the same person. He had reported things previously but the police had ignore. He was then subsequently arrested for harassment so felt he was being treated unfairly. Between him and the seven others he presented 400 pages of evidence in response to his arrest detailing how they had been repeatedly harassed, only to be dismissed again and charged.

One incident included a boom box being placed under his car. He's Irish. This is racist and an implicit bomb threat.

The bloke accusing him said under oath that he had tracked down where Linehan lived by using a photo of Linehan outside his house. He also obtained his telephone number but did a lot of 'i don't recall' at this point. This bloke also admitted to make threats online, wishing that it hadn't been soup but acid and then there's the footage of him harassing women at the BoI with his camera when they didn't want to be filmed which we know Linehan was witness to.

All of the above was talked about in court.

Then there was his arrest on Wednesday.

We have become aware that SB worked with Lyndsey Watson and we have been made aware that a wider group of TRAs knew that Glinner was going to be arrested on Wednesday before it happened. One posted about the 'trans underground Mafia'. We have also had posts on MN gleefully saying 'something big' was about to happen which I now am fairly sure was a reference to Glinners arrest.

There are also tweets requesting people report his website to anti terrorism and posts saying they have done this so there very much looks like coordinated targeted actions against him that are very much ongoing.

So all in all this week has demonstrated that even if Glinner sounds a bit tin foil hatted, it's representative of his lived experience and tbh I think those demonstrations of extreme behaviour would test a lot of rational reasonable people in terms of whether they thought there was a conspiracy involving collision/bias by the police. The intention of some of the harassment against him and others has very much been to test their sanity.

Even the ever cool JKRowling has pointed out the very obvious disparities in how she's been abused online and how the police have treated GC groups. Not to mention several court cases which have upheld complaints against the police along these lines.

I genuinely don't understand how you have come to some of the conclusions / questions in this post tbh.

Reading this made me realise for the first time the parallels with Sandie Peggie. She, too, felt harassed, tried to go through the correct channels (for her, her line managers etc.; for Linehan, the police), was unjustifiably rebuffed - and as a result of this, found herself having to speak up in a distressed state in a volatile situation. It’s something many victims of workplace bullying will recognise, too - attempt to behave appropriately in an untenable situation, only to momentarily crack and feel the full force of your employers’ wrath as the bully takes immediate advantage.

It also makes me think of my comment re. the BBC elsewhere in the thread - by not giving our concerns an equal voice, they’ve contributed to the pressure building in Peggie and - especially, very clearly - Linehan. Never mind their behaviour as our national broadcaster being undemocratic, it’s positively irresponsible.

None of this is to excuse Linehan’s actions - but it really does expose a telling and disturbing pattern. While I don’t support his approach and tone on balance, I have a lot of sympathy for him eventually lashing out on the day.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 06/09/2025 10:30

It seems that the allegation is that a lot of his bad behaviour online was via sock puppet accounts.

Chickenbone123 · 06/09/2025 10:31

People on Reddit have screenshots of apology from Glinner for sending unsolicited dick pics to women on here. Is this true?

oldphotosandlilies · 06/09/2025 10:31

I can't think of a single police force that doesn't appear to be absolutely corrupt, incompetent or both. I was going to say that IME the Met and the City of London are the worst, then I remember the Scottish, Northern Irish, Irish, Manchester, West Yorkshire, in fact all of them. What do you do when literally have no law enforcement you can trust?

Abhannmor · 06/09/2025 10:32

DeanElderberry · 06/09/2025 09:46

That is a really interesting comment. The continuity in membership of secret societies between Scotland and Northern Ireland is well known (as is the way the Kincora children's home was used to provide blackmail fodder for the
establishment).

It makes me wonder whether Glinner's national and cultural identity made him an extra tasty hate figure for them.

Hmm. That may have been a factor for some Scottish based Tras. If you're Irish and GC the faux Left in Britain will tend to ascribe it to your Catholic background.

Whereas here in Ireland you will be labelled an unwitting dupe of evil British imperialist Terfs. There's a lazy assumption to suit everyone in trala land .

BettyBooper · 06/09/2025 10:33

Chickenbone123 · 06/09/2025 10:31

People on Reddit have screenshots of apology from Glinner for sending unsolicited dick pics to women on here. Is this true?

'To women on here' as in MN??

zhackup · 06/09/2025 10:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

DabOfPistachio · 06/09/2025 10:44

Chickenbone123 · 06/09/2025 10:31

People on Reddit have screenshots of apology from Glinner for sending unsolicited dick pics to women on here. Is this true?

No, that's fake. Some one mocked it up. TRAs often bring it up to try discredit him even though it's been long debunked.
It is a good example of the kind of harassment he's up against.

SinnerBoy · 06/09/2025 10:44

EweSurname · 06/09/2025 07:42

The man who disrupted the FWS rally this week by blaring his music and who was protected by police to do so has now reported Susan dalgety from FWS for breaking his umbrella, despite lots of footage showing he arrived with a broken umbrella and she’s now being investigated by the police.

The asymmetry on policing is astonishing.

www.thetimes.com/article/3ade8d08-7830-4c0e-ae29-8ba63593fcce?shareToken=5c88285d4a63f2c11e7ca1d9e72d19cc

So, a man assaulted and woman with a makeshift weapon and she's being investigated. I hope there is footage of the incident and it can assist Ms. Smith in making a complaint; also that the Police charge the man with making a false statement.

Szygy · 06/09/2025 10:55

We know that Sophie Brooks has been working with Lyndsey Watson and Stephen Hayden and has closed association with Fred Wallace

Catching up, but yes, 'Tarquin' is 'Sophia Brooks'.

'Sophie Molly/Sophie Sparkles' is a different person entirely, but very much a fellow-traveller.

Incidentally, I’ll never be able to find it now, although I might give it a try by looking back through Nick Wallis's fantastic tweets, but was there a point in the last couple of days when somebody claimed that there was 'no connection' between the current case involving Glinner, and Lynsey Watson? That was very much a 'hmmmm' moment for me.

All of us on here have an overview. All of us on here can connect the dots. Resources like the excellent/chilling Wings over Scotland help draw everything together. It’s not tinfoil hat stuff, it’s happening.

bonfireoftheverities · 06/09/2025 10:56

EmeraldRoulette · 06/09/2025 02:34

@bonfireoftheverities what is security like there? And how busy was it? I would've thought it would be packed out now.

That's nice that you got to meet him. I'm surprised he doesn't go home and collapse in a heap. Honestly, I don't know how he is still standing - and that's before the airside arrest.

Forgot to mention, you had to take a sip out of any drink you were taking in.

After all the talk in the courtroom about photos I was bit nervous about asking Graham, but he was lovely. Initially I hadn't intended to be in the shot (I've never done a selfie with a Known Person before); I'm smiling like a loon. Other pic is the great Julia Long. Finally, everyone encouraged to join in for a group photo.

On the way to the pub I chatted with Maria Maclachlan about peaking. Wish I could remember the details, as she was very interesting!

Short clip is of SB & friends leaving.

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 3
Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 3
Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 3
Justme56 · 06/09/2025 11:00

SinnerBoy · 06/09/2025 10:44

So, a man assaulted and woman with a makeshift weapon and she's being investigated. I hope there is footage of the incident and it can assist Ms. Smith in making a complaint; also that the Police charge the man with making a false statement.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx29j3v5dq7o

I think it’s quite obvious that Police Scotland have a problem with women. If it happens inside the force it’s very likely to be evident outside too.

Two female police officers pictured from behind, they are both wearing hi-vis vests that have the word Police written on them. They are walking on a street next to parked police cars

Report finds evidence of Police Scotland misogyny

The findings came from the Independent Review Group which was tasked with looking into equality.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx29j3v5dq7o

RedToothBrush · 06/09/2025 11:04

ThatCyanCat · 06/09/2025 09:51

It may be partly because GCs don't have the time or inclination to flood the system with vexatious complaints. We generally have jobs, families, hobbies/creative pursuits and, as passionate as we are about the issue because it's important, we lack the single minded, egotistical obsessiveness shown by so many TRAs who are driven by their weak sense of self and/or passionate misogyny.

Ok, I was going to do a post about the concept of
'Why don't women make complaints?'

And I started off looking at harassment...

https://www.forbes.com/councils/yec/2018/10/30/workplace-harassment-why-women-dont-speak-up/
Obviously, there isn’t a simple answer. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, an estimated 75% of individuals who get harassed at work don’t file a complaint. The most often cited reasons include not wanting to be seen as a victim or attention-seeker, the humiliation, the time it will likely take including follow through, fear of negative consequences like being alienated or fired and being blamed as the victim.

Fairly straightforward.

Then I appear to have fallen down some sort of reporting black hole, when I decided to look at the NHS.

https://www.healthwatch.co.uk/news/2025-01-27/nhs-complaints-system-lets-people-down-new-research-warns
Our poll, conducted by YouGov, found that out of 2,650 adults living in England who had a poor experience of NHS healthcare, over half, 56%, took no action about their care, and fewer than one in 10, nine per cent, made a formal complaint.
Among those who didn’t formally complain when they had a poor experience, our research identified a number of key barriers to doing so:

  • Around a third of respondents, 34%, didn’t believe the NHS would use their complaint to improve services;
  • A third, 33%, thought NHS organisations wouldn’t respond effectively to their complaint;
  • Thirty percent didn’t believe the NHS would think their complaint was serious enough;
  • One in five, 20%, were scared that complaining would affect their ongoing treatment;
  • Nineteen percent said they didn’t know who to contact to make a complaint.
  • Overall, over half of people who made a complaint to an NHS organisation were dissatisfied with both the process of making a complaint, 56%, and the outcome of their complaint, 56%.

Curious I thought. Its gender neutral. I'd like to know whether women complain to the NHS more than men or not.
I tried to find data about complaints to the NHS by sex - it wasn't broken down. Its a pretty important stat to gender neutralise. But I couldn't find anything.

Odd I thought, given the following:

https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/collection/womens-health-why-women-feel-unheard/
The recent Women’s Health Strategy for England reported that more than 4 in 5 (84%) women responding to their survey had at times felt that their healthcare professionals were not listening to them. The finding was echoed by recent focus groups. We need to understand why this happens. Why don’t women feel listened to? What can be done to improve their conversations with healthcare professionals?

Then I found this article.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-65671018
35,000 cases of sexual misconduct or violence in NHS in five years

An NHS spokesperson has told the BBC that all NHS organisations must have robust measures in place to ensure immediate action is taken in any sexual cases reported to them.
But the BMJ and Guardian investigation found that fewer than one in 10 NHS trusts has a dedicated policy to deal with sexual assault and harassment - and that managers are also no longer obliged to report abuse of staff to a central database.
AND
Although more than 4,000 NHS staff were accused of rape, sexual assault, harassment, stalking, or abusive remarks towards other staff or patients in 2017-22, the BMJ and Guardian investigation found that only 576 have faced disciplinary action.

Once again, to my frustration this article was gender neutralised, with no reference to sex breakdown

And this one
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2jxjepm00zo
Sexual harassment of NHS staff widespread - survey

In the study of more than 12,200 health workers, one in 10 reported unwanted incidents including being touched or kissed, demands for sex in return for favours, and derogatory comments.

And AGAIN gender neutralised. I thought, ok this BBC article mentions the source is a Unison Survey.

I didn't find the one that relates to this news article but I did find another earlier unison survey asking the same question from 2019...

Of the people responding to the survey, 8% had suffered sexual harassment in the past two years. This report is based on their experiences.

The survey revealed that this type of unwanted behaviour is a major issue – for some employees, on a daily basis. Nearly one in ten (8%) respondents (695) said they'd been sexually harassed in the last year. Of these, nearly a third (31%) said the harassment was frequent/regular, and more than one in ten (12%) said it occurred daily/weekly. The vast majority (81%) of those harassed identified as female, and the rest (19%) male. Most (61%) said the harasser was older than them, nearly two in five (37%) said they were in a more powerful position, with under a third (32%) experiencing harassment from a colleague with the same level of responsibility.

Ok so we get a bit closer here and establish it IS gendered, but we don't find out sex. It'd actually be useful to know the breakdown with regards to sex - it might actually show that transwomen NHS staff are more at risk than women (or vice versa) but we don't know this.

It goes on:
The survey findings reveal that staff responded in various ways to the harassment with nearly a half (46%) telling a colleague, nearly three in ten (28%) keeping quiet, a quarter (26%) telling a friend/family member outside work, and just over a fifth (23%) speaking directly to the perpetrator. However, when it came to formal reporting, more than seven in ten (71%) shared their reasons for not doing so which included: • They felt nothing would be done (49%) • They'd be dismissed as oversensitive (37%) • They feared the perpetrator(s) would retaliate (24%) • They were scared it could harm their career (22%).
Of those who did report the sexual harassment, only 15% believed their case was dealt with properly. Employers appear to be failing to take a tough line on harassment. More than two thirds (68%) of those who experienced sexual harassment confirmed a policy existed in their workplace, yet fewer than one in five (17%) said it was implemented.

And at the bottom of the report it states
Reinstatement of section 40 of the Equality Act which ensured staff were safeguarded against harassment by third parties (for example, patients and their friends or relatives). Under this clause, employers were liable if they failed to act after two incidents. However, the government scrapped this ‘three-strikes’ rule in October 2013 on the grounds that other laws gave staff similar protection, a claim disputed by UNISON

Which I thought MOST interesting in the context of the subject at hand.

Its completely off topic really - my point was going to be that women don't complain because they have very low trust in the institutions that are supposed to look after them and there being a history of structural failure in this area...

... it probably deserves its own thread on how this problem on the basis of sex is making what is a particular problem for women invisible.

Anyway, I'm going to finish on this BBC article (where they managed to acknowledge women exist, well at least to a point):
https://www.bbc.co.uk/worklife/article/20230615-why-its-getting-harder-for-some-women-to-report-harassment
Why it's getting harder for some women to report harassment

Global data shows that workplace harassment – which includes actions such as persistent unwanted sexual advances or, as in Diane’s experience, bullying – is rampant, and that it disproportionately affects women and minorities. Indeed, 2023 figures from Deloitte’s annual Women at Work report show that some 44% of women in a survey of 5,000 women across 10 countries said that they had experienced harassment, micro-aggressions or both in the workplace during the preceding year.

But while the statistics in and of themselves are concerning, what’s perhaps even more worrying is that the proportion of women who have experienced harassment but who have chosen not to report it is high – and may be growing. Deloitte researchers found that only 59% of women who said they were harassed reported the incidents to their employer, down from 66% in the prior year’s survey.

“This is a concerning drop, as it reveals that far too many women don’t feel comfortable reporting harassment, and the percentage is only growing,” says Emma Codd, Deloitte’s Global Inclusion Leader, based in the UK.
Experts across the legal, academic and HR fields say the reasons for the decrease in reporting is likely the result of a combination of factors: from fear of retaliation, to a sense that the behaviour or actions might just not be serious enough to warrant a report.

And some experts say that the number of those who haven’t reported harassment could be increasing due to the current precarious economic outlook and unsteady labour market – two factors that have traditionally disproportionately affected working women. Indeed, Codd points out that about one-fifth of the women who have experienced harassment at work but decided not to report it said their decision was driven by concern that reporting the behavior would adversely affect their career trajectory.

AND

Researchers have found women’s wages rise at a slower average pace than men’s, and women have historically been less likely than men to be promoted. They are also more likely to receive a harsher punishment than men for missteps and misconduct. One research paper published in the Harvard Business Review found that female financial advisers were 20 percent more likely to lose their jobs, relative to comparable male advisers, when they committed an “incident of misconduct” – a regulatory breach, for examples. Women, the paper found, are also 30% less likely to find new jobs following misconduct.

INeedAPensieve · 06/09/2025 11:16

SinnerBoy · 06/09/2025 10:44

So, a man assaulted and woman with a makeshift weapon and she's being investigated. I hope there is footage of the incident and it can assist Ms. Smith in making a complaint; also that the Police charge the man with making a false statement.

This i think is the same man who shouted "fuck you" at sexual assault and rape survivors going to the Filia conference in Glasgow last year. Our then first minister humza actually put a statement condemning his behaviour. He is absolutely abhorrent. My complaint to one of the staff at the Burrell museum for platforming him and having a video of him in one of their exhibits was ignored. It's enraging.

Catiette · 06/09/2025 11:17

PriOn1 · 06/09/2025 09:02

With regard to tin foil hat territory, I have long thought the current situation and sheer regulatory capture that periodically gets discussed on here, are so extreme that anyone describing it to anyone who is new to all this risks being dismissed as having gone a bit crazy.

Telling people on Twix, years ago, that there were men in women’s prisons was often met with disbelief, as was the fact that medics were cutting breasts off teenage girls and giving drugs to children that cause sterility, for a mental health problem.

Those things are now well established, but the sheer gaslighting of these terrifying bullies is also appalling to watch. These are grown sociopathic men, who are wielding the police and manipulating the law, as well as turning up at women’s houses, attacking them on social media, while broadly staying out of the spotlight.

Having experienced this kind of bullying as a young woman, I know the only way to escape the grips of these men, once they have you in their sights, is grey rock, but then we see this new tactic, throwing a trained youngster into the ring to get into people’s faces, driving them to the point where it’s impossible to achieve grey rock, other than by withdrawing from any kind of activism.

And, of course, that is a sideline to their sheer enjoyment at seeing their victims panic, suffer, get angry and realize how powerless they are to do anything about the monster who is tormented them, but has convinced the world he’s the victim.

I despise these men with every fibre of my being, but have never found any way to defeat them as they always have support from the power structures in society.

If Graham Linehan can finally make others see this struggle, he will have achieved something. I feel for him though as, even in a much smaller scale, gaslighting was the worst thing that ever happened to me. It broke my mind and I’ve never really fully recovered.

Edited

I'm so sorry for this. I found your post very moving. I wasn't going to mention, but did intimate, in my last, that I, too, have experienced bullying and gaslighting of this kind, and, like you, carry the scars. It's an appalling experience.

RedToothBrush · 06/09/2025 11:19

Ereshkigalangcleg · 06/09/2025 10:30

It seems that the allegation is that a lot of his bad behaviour online was via sock puppet accounts.

From Nick Wallis's tweets - in which Sophie Brooks
a) admits he has more than one twitter account (but has sudden onset court dementia about how many)
b) when prompted admits to at least one sock puppet account which dish out targetted abuse
c) this was in response to a 'long standing feud'
d) his target was GC
e) his target had reported him to the police (and nothing seems to have been done about it by the police)

Its not exactly out there to suggest that he did the same to Glinner. He actually ADMITS under oath he did the same to someone else, and only after confronted with named twitter accounts.

How many accounts did he have to get to the point that he couldn't remember them?

How many account on twitter is it normal to have? One, maybe two for private and professional?

SV how many X accounts did you have in Oct last year
SB I don't remember
SV a number
SB I really don't remember
[SV names one]
SB yes
[SV names two more]
SB yes [Judge is amused by the X name "Beans Wit Pasties"]
SV you used your accounts to make allegations people were nonces, didn't you
SB I don't remember SV let me help you
[SV gives him a printed photo of a tweet from one of his accounts Sophie [with trans hearts]]
SV there are screenshots which show you on 23 Nov you called someone a "fucking weirdo nonce"
SB confirms
[SV reads out another tweet in which one of SB's sock accounts accuses Thames Pilgrim of obsessing over 16yo girls (SB confirms he means SB)]
SV so Thames Pilgrim could see this
SB yes - he was saying things about me it was part of an ongoing feud
SV I'm not asking you about that J pls just answer the questions [SV takes him to a Jill Womb Haulier tweet where she says she's quite scared]
SV whats your attitude towards male violence against women
SB in what context
SV in any context
SB it's not okay ever
SV Thames Pilgrim is an ally of GC feminists
SB we have a long-standing feud - he's reported me to the police
SV do you think TP is an ally of GC movement
SB he considers himself to be

WearyAuldWumman · 06/09/2025 11:25

murasaki · 06/09/2025 00:37

I'd be buying bottled water....

Seriously, just bad luck, but a lot of it.

I joined my local municipal gym.

I asked about the whereabouts of the showers and changing facilities. The young man behind the desk told me where to find them. He then hesitated and told me that there were also showers that I could use downstairs in the pool area, but that these were in the unisex changing village.

I could later see why he warned me. There are gaps above the cubicles in the changing village and it looks like bars have been fitted over them retrospectively to stop people being able to crawl over the top.

The dry change area (which also has showers) makes it quite clear that it's single sex - the sign on the door simply says "Women".

A couple of weeks later, I was looking out the window as I was doing my cardio on a stationary bicycle and saw someone who was clearly a bloke sauntering up the walkway leading to the main door of the facility.

He was wearing an outfit very similar (but not identical) to that worn by by the gym instructors and appeared to have a couple of balloons stuffed up his polo shirt. I've never seen him again, thankfully. Maybe the "Women" sign scared him off.

RedToothBrush · 06/09/2025 11:30

Nick Wallis's tweeting continued.

SV do yo know Jean Hatched
SB I know the name
SV ever year she organises a bike ride for
... murdered women - to commemorate them
SB didn't know that
SV you know about Posey Parker and her real name
SB Kelly Jay Kean
SV PP is a GC campaigner
SB yes
SV v high profile
SB not so much.... actually yes she is
SV Jean wrote a post with a pic saying - they've thrown soup over Posy again - shameful
SV and a reply saying it could have been acid
SV and you say
SB really wish it was though
SV really wish it was though
SB she's harassed me called me a sociopath
SV being a sociopath...
... is about a lack of empathy. Were you showing empathy there?
SB I have a lack of empathy for those who attack me
SV so violence against women is okay
SB that's not what I said
SV no you wrote you wished it was acid - is that okay
SB no SV because you got caught out
SB no
SV you are concerned about being unemployable because of being called a "domestic terrorist" - yet you use accounts like this to dish out abuse
SB L has 500k followers that account had about 30 - quite a contrast I think

a) a second admission of sock puppetry to abuse and wish acid had been thrown in the face of a GC woman for her beliefs.
b) justified because someone had called him a sociopath (which given the context rather demonstrates she wasn't wrong).
c) saying that its ok to have a lack of empathy for those who disagree with him and call him a name and to abuse them using a sock puppet account
d) suddenly his sudden onset court dementia receeds and he's able to note the number of followers that particular sock puppet account had.

Hmm.

So two example admitted under oath...

...you'd think the police might want to check his hard drive at this point.

EmeraldRoulette · 06/09/2025 11:30

@bonfireoftheverities thanks for sharing

I thought they'd be airport style security in a court. I would be so annoyed with people taking lozenges out of a tin! I feel a Reece Shearsmith style rant coming on 😂

WearyAuldWumman · 06/09/2025 11:32

PriOn1 · 06/09/2025 09:02

With regard to tin foil hat territory, I have long thought the current situation and sheer regulatory capture that periodically gets discussed on here, are so extreme that anyone describing it to anyone who is new to all this risks being dismissed as having gone a bit crazy.

Telling people on Twix, years ago, that there were men in women’s prisons was often met with disbelief, as was the fact that medics were cutting breasts off teenage girls and giving drugs to children that cause sterility, for a mental health problem.

Those things are now well established, but the sheer gaslighting of these terrifying bullies is also appalling to watch. These are grown sociopathic men, who are wielding the police and manipulating the law, as well as turning up at women’s houses, attacking them on social media, while broadly staying out of the spotlight.

Having experienced this kind of bullying as a young woman, I know the only way to escape the grips of these men, once they have you in their sights, is grey rock, but then we see this new tactic, throwing a trained youngster into the ring to get into people’s faces, driving them to the point where it’s impossible to achieve grey rock, other than by withdrawing from any kind of activism.

And, of course, that is a sideline to their sheer enjoyment at seeing their victims panic, suffer, get angry and realize how powerless they are to do anything about the monster who is tormented them, but has convinced the world he’s the victim.

I despise these men with every fibre of my being, but have never found any way to defeat them as they always have support from the power structures in society.

If Graham Linehan can finally make others see this struggle, he will have achieved something. I feel for him though as, even in a much smaller scale, gaslighting was the worst thing that ever happened to me. It broke my mind and I’ve never really fully recovered.

Edited

My late husband thought that I was nuts when I told him about this. Then the daughter and granddaughter came up from England for a visit.

The GD was then at uni in the south of England. Her third subject in first yr was "Gender Studies". Her mum proudly told us that the GD had written an essay about "significance of lipstick". (I bit my tongue - I did a post-grad diploma in Media Ed some years back, so it covered a lot of this stuff.)

Later, it turned out that the GD's best friend was a "trans man" who'd had an elective bilateral mastectomy at the age of 20. When my stepdaughter expressed her concern to the GD, the response was "Mum! You're sooooooo transphobic!"

DeanElderberry · 06/09/2025 11:40

Abhannmor · 06/09/2025 10:32

Hmm. That may have been a factor for some Scottish based Tras. If you're Irish and GC the faux Left in Britain will tend to ascribe it to your Catholic background.

Whereas here in Ireland you will be labelled an unwitting dupe of evil British imperialist Terfs. There's a lazy assumption to suit everyone in trala land .

☘ 😁 🇮🇪

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.