Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women Against the Far Right - Open Letter

222 replies

ThisChicPinkRaven · 02/09/2025 07:08

A collection of prominent women have signed an open letter regarding the far right's consistent, and increasing, 'justification' for their vile behaviour that immigrants represent a sexual threat to women.

It's true that there are some instances of sexual violence committed by migrants, the overwhelming majority - to the surprise of absolutely nobody - is committed by men who are UK nationals and born here.

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this subject, specifically whether your personal politics regarding migrants are coloured by the degree of threat you feel.
I am aware that there are some people on this board who hold views not wholly compatible with the rest of us, so please remember to be kind, patient, and thoughtful in your responses.

Source Links
Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/sep/02/women-stop-linking-asylum-seekers-sexual-abuse
Independent: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/womens-safety-far-right-vawg-government-b2811674.html

Prominent UK women tell rightwingers: stop linking immigration to sexual abuse

Exclusive: Open letter says politicians are exploiting violence against women ‘to fuel hate and division’

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/sep/02/women-stop-linking-asylum-seekers-sexual-abuse

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
SummerFeverVenice · 03/09/2025 01:22

RingoJuice · 02/09/2025 08:22

Americans undergo background checks as part of any visa process. You don’t do the same for asylum seekers, do you?

Yes we do. All asylum seekers are identity and background checked.

SummerFeverVenice · 03/09/2025 01:25

RingoJuice · 02/09/2025 08:26

If they really want to keep women safe why are they focussing on what can be done about a minority of migrants rather than what is clearly so deeply wrong with our patriarchal society?

Because you could just have border control
and deny them entry. You are a fucking island, no land borders. So why not deal with this low-hanging fruit? Why make things even MORE difficult for yourselves?

I can’t understand it.

Er, Ireland and Northern Ireland is a land border? We have always had border controls?

Maybe look at a map of the country and do a bit of research before lobbing asinine comments?

SummerFeverVenice · 03/09/2025 01:31

arethereanyleftatall · 02/09/2025 09:44

The op lost any credibility with the failure to comprehend ‘per capita’. I actually laughed out loud with the sentence about the most assault - IN BRITAIN - is being committed by British citizens.
We know the convictions of non-whites is far higher than whites per capita. That’s easily found.
What we don’t know, either way, is whether those convictions are unfairly/discriminatory. But we can’t possibly know that, so all we can surely go off is the actual convictions.
how will anyone ever achieve any safeguarding etc rules if even actual numbers in prisons are dismissed?
having signatures of people who think twaw won’t help your cause, as they are upfront showing everyone they’re misogynists and liars.

You have lost all credibility by implying that British and white are synonymous.

MyDarlingWhatIfYouFly · 03/09/2025 01:34

RingoJuice · 02/09/2025 08:26

If they really want to keep women safe why are they focussing on what can be done about a minority of migrants rather than what is clearly so deeply wrong with our patriarchal society?

Because you could just have border control
and deny them entry. You are a fucking island, no land borders. So why not deal with this low-hanging fruit? Why make things even MORE difficult for yourselves?

I can’t understand it.

Well let’s just deny entry to all men then, since we know that over 98% rape perpetrators are men. Then we can prevent rapes from all men coming into the country.

Because the likelihood of rape based on flawed statistics is of course the only thing we should consider when assessing who to let in.

SummerFeverVenice · 03/09/2025 01:41

Yes, if I was a 14 you girl living Rotherham I would absolutely judge the people around me by the color of their skin. And if you're biggest concern about thay is that I'm being racist, then you're a morally-reprehensible gang rape-apologist.

🥴 ZanyFatBall would you happen to be from the Deep South? Your view that not judging people by the ‘color of their skin’ means you are a ‘gang rape apologist’ is very Coo Clucks Can.

Chickenbone123 · 03/09/2025 01:44

specifically whether your personal politics regarding migrants are coloured by the degree of threat you feel.

Regarding migrants as a whole it probably represents perhaps 50% my feelings for disagreeing with legal mass migration. Not sexual threat specifically, but all threat. Crime, terrorism, cultural change etc. The other 50% is to do with resource, services, sustainability, economics, democracy etc.

Regarding asylum seekers it probably is much higher. Perhaps 90%. Mainly due to them being unvetted, undocumented, housed in large groups of males, and that even if we do want to deport them if they commit crime. Well we often can’t. So they are a heightened risk in the early years due to the housing and social situation they live in; plus a long term risk in that we can’t really get rid of them if they do turn out to be wronguns.

NoStoneUnturned · 03/09/2025 02:02

Why don't these prominent UK women put their money where their mouth is and buy and open hotels or HMOs for asylum seekers near where they live? Probably make a profit. Don't forget to walk around at night near them to show us all how safe they are!

Illjusthavethebreadsticks · 03/09/2025 02:08

reversegear · 02/09/2025 08:15

So because we agree that all men of all colours and nationalities commit sexual assault and rape we are all supposed to be ok with allowing even more men from cultures that allow child marriage and rape into our country and not aim to restrict their numbers and reduce women’s risk?

👏👏👏

RingoJuice · 03/09/2025 05:33

Illjusthavethebreadsticks · 03/09/2025 02:08

👏👏👏

This is pretty much their argument, when you break it down 😭

ThisChicPinkRaven · 03/09/2025 06:19

SummerFeverVenice · 03/09/2025 01:31

You have lost all credibility by implying that British and white are synonymous.

Here, here.

I'd also suggest @arethereanyleftatall didn't do themselves any favours by making the myopic statement "The op lost any credibility with the failure to comprehend ‘per capita’". I don't think I mentioned 'per capita' in the slightest, much less "failed to comprehend" it.
My assumption is @arethereanyleftatall's reading age isn't quite on par with ours, so I think we can safely treat their post accordingly.

OP posts:
ThisChicPinkRaven · 03/09/2025 06:36

DiaAssolellat · 02/09/2025 19:37

I find your phrase literal rape enablers abhorrent. The women signing the letter have not enabled rapists, and you’re saying immigrants are rapists. Just…..wow.

This thread has really allowed the racists amongst the MN community to show their true colours. Pun absolutely intended.

"This thread has really allowed the racists amongst the MN community to show their true colours"

I absolutely agree with you, but I still maintain it's important to hear their views.
I think one of the driving reasons that we have such a hideous class divide in this country is because those who espouse views we might think of as racist feel their concerns are being ignored and/or dismissed.

Where I think it becomes a problem is when this impotent frustration spills over into overt racism and the ugly, aggressive "stop the boats" and "send them all back" rhetoric that comes with it.

My personal view on this letter is that it's laudable. That's not necessarily the same thing as effective, of course, but Lord knows that with 'protests' designed to intimidate and frighten migrants and rather disadvantaged people spray painting roundabouts in the fevered hope people will give way to the right (pun very much intended), the side of sanity needs more of these outspoken gestures.

OP posts:
Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 07:19

arethereanyleftatall · 02/09/2025 09:44

The op lost any credibility with the failure to comprehend ‘per capita’. I actually laughed out loud with the sentence about the most assault - IN BRITAIN - is being committed by British citizens.
We know the convictions of non-whites is far higher than whites per capita. That’s easily found.
What we don’t know, either way, is whether those convictions are unfairly/discriminatory. But we can’t possibly know that, so all we can surely go off is the actual convictions.
how will anyone ever achieve any safeguarding etc rules if even actual numbers in prisons are dismissed?
having signatures of people who think twaw won’t help your cause, as they are upfront showing everyone they’re misogynists and liars.

We do know that because women know what happens when they are raped and report it. Usually nothing

Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 07:22

ThatZanyFatball · 02/09/2025 14:57

Let's settle this once and for all bc it is glaringly obvious that OP is a man and what he is trying to accomplish with his post.

I am a mother to a teen daughter. Since I am a woman, I have a real understanding of how to navigate the world from a woman's perspective due solely from lived experience. And here's what I tell my daughter.

If you're walking down the street and someone is walking near you, I don't care what they look like, what sex they are, what color they are, what "identity" they are etc. If your gut is telling you you might be in danger, cross the street. It doesn't matter what it makes the other person feel or if you come across this way or that. It doesn't matter if the reason is how they look or their color or size or sex etc. You know why? Because if you're wrong you can always apologize later. And if that person is a decent and kind person, they too will understand why you crossed the street and not judge you for it. But if your gut is right, and you don't cross the street bc you're more concerned about their feelings than your safety, you won't get the chance to apologize.

But see people like OP are part of the concerted effort to make women feel that the threat of being assaulted, raped, kidnapped, or murdered is a worse thing than the possibility of hurting someone else's feelings. So he comes here and posts things like this calling us all racists to try and get us to question what every woman understands to be trusted safety protocols to manipulate us into loosening them, leaving us more exposed to the very nefarious behavior he and his ilk wish to perpetrate against us.

So let's not even entertain this by defending ourselves against his manipulative accusations. Because if he were a real woman (or even a decent man for that matter) he would actually understand.

The reality is that you should feel more unsafe around the men you know than the men you dont. The men you welcome into your home are more likely to abuse your children than any migrant you do not know. So remember that around your husband, your brothers, your father... its them most likely to touch your children inappropriately and groom them. Not some man in a hotel down the road. The men you chose to be in their lives.

Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 07:26

TempestTost · 02/09/2025 10:24

Everyone, everyone knows that British men, white or otherwise, commit sexual assaults. Ffs many many women have been sexually assaulted.

Your argument doesn't work because no woman is ignorant that men from all kinds of backgrounds can and do commit sexual assault., even if they think there are certain groups who are over-represented.

They know it is a bollocks argument and it makes you seem disingenuous.

No they really don't because many people victim blame. They don't believe that all these women are really raped by their white and/or British boyfriends, especially those from two parent families and nice homes. They don't believe their husbands and sons are doing anything like this and will lose everything to defend them in court if they have to. They often win.

Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 07:30

SouthWamses · 02/09/2025 10:44

Because it has been clearly reported plus plenty of reports if you know many F2s.

https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2025-05-07/bma-we-could-potentially-see-thousands-of-unemployed-doctors

So a doctor complaining about the UK taking specialist candidates from abroad is going abroad to take a specialist candidate position from another country? Not ironic at all.

Could it be that the British candidates aren't good enough? I've definitely heard clinical staff say that medical students just aren't as on the ball as they used to be when it comes to actually working with patients. Give them exam questions and they do fine, real life stuff? Not so much.

Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 07:31

Chickenbone123 · 03/09/2025 01:44

specifically whether your personal politics regarding migrants are coloured by the degree of threat you feel.

Regarding migrants as a whole it probably represents perhaps 50% my feelings for disagreeing with legal mass migration. Not sexual threat specifically, but all threat. Crime, terrorism, cultural change etc. The other 50% is to do with resource, services, sustainability, economics, democracy etc.

Regarding asylum seekers it probably is much higher. Perhaps 90%. Mainly due to them being unvetted, undocumented, housed in large groups of males, and that even if we do want to deport them if they commit crime. Well we often can’t. So they are a heightened risk in the early years due to the housing and social situation they live in; plus a long term risk in that we can’t really get rid of them if they do turn out to be wronguns.

What sort of cultural change? You won't be able to eat a roast on a Sunday?

PamIsAVolleyballChamp · 03/09/2025 07:35

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 02/09/2025 08:20

Both things can be true. It's men. From this country, from other countries, probably if they were from the moon, common denominator, maleness.

yep and I'd be far more inclined to pay attention to this letter if it wasn't signed by the fully paid up TWAW/men are women if they say they are you bigot/only old real clutchers want single sex spaces because they're past it and not down with the shiny new women with cocks

as has been said so many times on here; if someone is prepared to lie and say that men are women if they say they are, I'm inclined to ignore their views on anything related to women because they apparently don't know what one is

Absolutely this!

Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 07:53

Hmm the idea of ignoring other women who disagree with my views doesnt sit well with me. It seems very ethnocentric and encourages people to think that all women are a monolith and therefore all men are too. I don't agree that TWAW but I don't think the opinions of women who do are inferior to me or count less as women. That's a pretty vile.

Pharazon · 03/09/2025 08:11

SouthWamses · 03/09/2025 01:00

Oh look, another racist looking to deny the existence of a whole indigenous ethnic group. The BBC would be proud.

What indigenous ethnic group? The post referred to talked about avoiding contact with immigrant men due to safety concerns. When of course the poster actually meant non-white people, regardless of whether they are immigrants or not.

anyolddinosaur · 03/09/2025 08:14

My personal politics are certainly coloured by the threats I feel - I regard Farage as a far worse threat than a few asylum seekers. So I hoped I'd be able to support this letter. I cant. It's bilge to claim that the problem is all men and not recognise that some cultures have a far worse attitude to women than others. If we welcome men from those countries - whether illegally or legally - we have a duty to teach them better attitudes. That is not happening in any significant way.

All the stuff about adjusting statistics for their age, trauma and whatever other excuse you can dream up is bullshit. The government wont collect accurate statistics because it knows it would not like the answer. But the lack of an answer means the problem is quite possibly being exaggerated.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/09/2025 08:15

How high minded of you @Ihavetoask

Do you think the opinions of women who have concerns about immigration or grooming gangs are “inferior to you” and shouldn’t be listened to? You’re not coming across like you actually empathise with many of the women on this thread, whether their concerns are misplaced or not.

I’m pretty sure you’ve dismissed their views, as much as they’ve dismissed the views of a few pampered, out of touch celebrities/MPs and their “open letter”. Do you think the actual “far right” are interested in what they think? Or are they actually just smearing ordinary people as “far right” for perfectly commonplace opinions about the limits of immigration?

SouthWamses · 03/09/2025 08:18

Pharazon · 03/09/2025 08:11

What indigenous ethnic group? The post referred to talked about avoiding contact with immigrant men due to safety concerns. When of course the poster actually meant non-white people, regardless of whether they are immigrants or not.

The constant reference to not being able to identify Brits by their colour. Posters don’t mean some immigrants are white; they are denying there is an indigenous ethnic population in the UK which is as racist as denying any other ethnic group exists. It is like saying there are no indigenous American tribes because other races have moved to America and intermarried with them.

Ihavetoask · 03/09/2025 08:21

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/09/2025 08:15

How high minded of you @Ihavetoask

Do you think the opinions of women who have concerns about immigration or grooming gangs are “inferior to you” and shouldn’t be listened to? You’re not coming across like you actually empathise with many of the women on this thread, whether their concerns are misplaced or not.

I’m pretty sure you’ve dismissed their views, as much as they’ve dismissed the views of a few pampered, out of touch celebrities/MPs and their “open letter”. Do you think the actual “far right” are interested in what they think? Or are they actually just smearing ordinary people as “far right” for perfectly commonplace opinions about the limits of immigration?

Errrrr. No. I have no issue with people expressing their views and I don't think it negates or supports their identity as women in any way. It's just people thinking things. I may strongly disagree with the view and think it is totally inaccurate, but it doesn't make the speaker an inferior woman or a suspicious woman.

Pharazon · 03/09/2025 08:26

SouthWamses · 03/09/2025 08:18

The constant reference to not being able to identify Brits by their colour. Posters don’t mean some immigrants are white; they are denying there is an indigenous ethnic population in the UK which is as racist as denying any other ethnic group exists. It is like saying there are no indigenous American tribes because other races have moved to America and intermarried with them.

You can’t identify Brits by their colour. A significant proportion of Brits are non-white. Similarly a significant proportion of non-British residents are white. A British ethnocultural group doesn’t exist - there are English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish ethnic groups, but ‘British’ is a 300 year old political accommodation and nothing more.

RingoJuice · 03/09/2025 08:29

The reality is that you should feel more unsafe around the men you know than the men you dont

We all know parents are the most likely to kill their children. But that doesn’t mean we should totally ignore murders by unrelated adults!

IIRC 90% of children are killed by their own parents/stepparents. By your logic, should
we stop teaching ‘stranger danger’? Should schools stop safeguarding since most kids are killed and/or abused by their parents anyway?

Of course not.

Swipe left for the next trending thread