A despicable smear campaign by association. And one that is not logical.
If you don’t want a man in your changing room but make some Trump supporting comment, you’re a bad person and it’s valid to disregard your views on men who claim they're women. If you don’t want a man in your changing room but express what could be construed as racist views, you’re a bad person and it’s valid to dismiss your views on men.
However, if you don’t want a man in your changing rooms, but support Labour or the Democrats, work to improve your community, foster children, save the whales, hug trees, and volunteer for human rights charities, you are still a bad person according to genderists and it’s valid to disregard your views on men in women’s changing rooms.
So how on earth is it possible for Sandie to win in the minds of brainwashed colleagues? And what possible valid commentary can this Lindsey person have to say about SP that actually matters?
Even if SP were racist, homophobic, transphobic (whatever that means), mean to colleagues, and occasionally made a medical error, none of that should mean that it’s right to force her to get undressed in front of a man.
It really is extraordinary - and an incredible testament to the most effective MRA campaign ever - that the perspective that TW (and it’s always TW and not TM) are brave, authentic selves that should be allowed to take over any female role and/or enter any female space without question. End of.
Convinces me that mass delusions are possible.