Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #43

1000 replies

nauticant · 25/07/2025 15:21

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence had been intended to be 28 July with 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing was to have ended on 30 July. However, it became apparent as the hearing progressed that this schedule wouldn't be followed.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:
drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #40 can be found in this thread: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5379717-sandie-peggie-list-of-threads-covering-employment-tribunal-and-afterwards

Thread 41: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5379334-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-41 24 July 2025 to 25 July 2025
Thread 42: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5379820-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-42 25 July 2025 to 25 July 2025

OP posts:
Thread gallery
39
OP posts:
GailBlancheViola · 27/07/2025 10:47

Waitwhat23 · 27/07/2025 10:15

I tend to agree with this. Trying to spread clotted cream on top of jam is a hiding to nothing.

Generally jam then cream. I do not understand those who do butter and jam and cream. Bleugh.

That s where you are going wrong Wait you don't spread clotted cream you just lob a great big spoonfull of the stuff on top.

Largesso · 27/07/2025 10:48

FlirtsWithRhinos · 27/07/2025 10:27

I'm sure he does believe he's a woman. He believes there's newer betterer understanding of what a woman is that's far more significant and meaningful than boring old body sex and that since people with boring old body sex are far too boring and dull to understand it they just need to get with the program, take it on trust and do as they are told.

He thinks if he can trap women who object by changing meanings of words and pretending not to know what the old meaning were anymore so that anything they say gets twisted, that somehow means the actual reality about which they were talking about is no longer real.

It convinces people, for a while, because most people start by assuming good intent. But the longer it goes on the stronger the back-of-mind feeling that this isn't right gets. Eventually everyone peaks.

All anyone needs to remember is that is even if the word "woman" really isn't specifically female, plenty of people still are, so even if TW are ultimately successful in distorting the meaning of the word Woman to include their non-female selves they still aren't creating a justification to treat them as female, they are just creating a vancy in language and culture for new words and new rights and new protections for the people who are.

I do see your point but I am no firmly of the belief DU very much enjoys being a man. He enjoyes knowing that he is a man whilst performing as a woman. It’s a sport je gets a lot of pleasure from.

Because what he enjoys most of all is being a victim and there are fewer oops for being a victim in his maleness.

I think the future is set for him because whatever the outcome he gets to be victim hero for himself and trans.

There’s a series on TV called Smoke and if you replaced fire with trans the male fire investigator’s narrative arc would very much parallel DU.

He is looking forward to when he brings his own ET agains NHSF so he can play the main character victim. SP having that role must be doing his head in!?

Merrymouse · 27/07/2025 10:49

borntobequiet · 27/07/2025 10:38

The picture of a scone in the link above is wrong. You halve a scone and put a thick layer of clotted cream and jam on each half. That way you get more cream and jam per scone, and you can eat it without dislocating your jaw or getting cream down your cleavage as it spurts out.
Clotted cream is basically butter, so goes on first. In the sad eventuality of having only whipped cream, it goes on second, and you pretty much have a dessert rather than afternoon tea.
Strawberry jam is the correct jam for scones with raspberry as an acceptable substitute.
I am in my seventies and by dint of age and wisdom, always right.

Yes, I think we can at least all agree that the scone should not be eaten as a sandwich.

Falderalagain · 27/07/2025 10:50

Boiledbeetle · 27/07/2025 09:22

No! But I do do my scones dairy jam dairy as I butter them first.

Good woman!

mylittlekomododragon · 27/07/2025 10:52

Does anyone know anything about the “chaos” that Upton has apparently caused in previous posts? I’ve seen mention of him causing trouble at Ninewells. Apologies if this has been covered.

Sugarplumfairycakes1 · 27/07/2025 10:52

borntobequiet · 27/07/2025 10:45

I think his mental decline really started to show in the final few books. They read like a poor imitation of his best work - feeble storylines, little character development, a lack of the joyful sense of the ridiculous that permeated all his earlier work, and a lack of a deep moral dimension too.
I hope he didn’t have a full appreciation of this.

I agree. They were not the 'essence' of Sir Terry. I think it is because they were not mainly written by him, rather his PA and others.

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 27/07/2025 10:52

Merrymouse · 27/07/2025 10:37

And boring old body sex has an asymmetrical impact.

If you are male your role in reproduction is so limited that you may never know if you have any offspring. Your sex has much more impact on intangible concepts like status and sexual attraction, so you may conclude that gender is more important than sex.

That is so insightful! Explains much more than T ideology.

bloodredfeaturewall · 27/07/2025 10:52

overwhisking whipping cream to almost butter gets a similar product to clotted cream if you are desperate.

DeanElderberry · 27/07/2025 10:53

BriceNobeslovesMurielHeslop · 27/07/2025 10:45

@DeanElderberry my Danish friend thought I was absolutely bananaboats when I begged to be allowed to feed the chickens when we visited her family farm. She said it was like getting excited about taking the bins out.

Edited

Much less chance of meeting rats near the bins in my experience, and they don't have those terrifying wattles, or beady-eyed death stares.

GnomeDePlume · 27/07/2025 10:56

FlirtsWithRhinos · 27/07/2025 10:27

I'm sure he does believe he's a woman. He believes there's newer betterer understanding of what a woman is that's far more significant and meaningful than boring old body sex and that since people with boring old body sex are far too boring and dull to understand it they just need to get with the program, take it on trust and do as they are told.

He thinks if he can trap women who object by changing meanings of words and pretending not to know what the old meaning were anymore so that anything they say gets twisted, that somehow means the actual reality about which they were talking about is no longer real.

It convinces people, for a while, because most people start by assuming good intent. But the longer it goes on the stronger the back-of-mind feeling that this isn't right gets. Eventually everyone peaks.

All anyone needs to remember is that is even if the word "woman" really isn't specifically female, plenty of people still are, so even if TW are ultimately successful in distorting the meaning of the word Woman to include their non-female selves they still aren't creating a justification to treat them as female, they are just creating a vancy in language and culture for new words and new rights and new protections for the people who are.

I dunno, he just reminds me a bit of people I have known who move from one church to another, enjoying all the attention. Once the baptism is done and the spotlight is no longer on them they move on. They aren't interested when volunteers are needed to drive people to appointments, help out at fetes etc.

Until now he was enjoying being special. Senior managers asking if he was okay, falling over backwards to make sure nothing was going to upset the precious, fragile, flower.

Of course senior managers had their own agenda, making sure they could tick the 'supportive' box and demonstrate they had been sitting up straight and writing notes during the diversity training.

Maybe being able to show that a 'mean, bigoted, nurse' had been disciplined also added to their 'inclusivity score'. Gold stars all round and if a nurse has a 30 year career blighted what of it? She's only a nurse. She just had to say 'sorry' attend re-education and everyone could get on with normal.

It has now blown up in their faces. Both for NHSF and DU.

SternlyMatthews · 27/07/2025 10:58

@KnottyAuty thank you for a top notch analysis, it would be well worth getting a friendly journo to publish that.

DuesToTheDirt · 27/07/2025 10:58

SternlyMatthews · 27/07/2025 09:05

Good short piece from Euan McColm in the Scotman, on doctors & trust, with an honourable mention for Pete, & scathing on Searle & Upton, a consultant not a three year old, & not suitable for a doctors career, respectively.

https://archive.is/2cjIp

This is an excellent summary of the case so far, I think.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 27/07/2025 11:14

borntobequiet · 27/07/2025 10:45

I think his mental decline really started to show in the final few books. They read like a poor imitation of his best work - feeble storylines, little character development, a lack of the joyful sense of the ridiculous that permeated all his earlier work, and a lack of a deep moral dimension too.
I hope he didn’t have a full appreciation of this.

I agree. Absolutely the mind that wrote the later books was not what it was, and there was a lot of Rob Wilkins input to get the stories into a publishable shape.

But STP also said as he felt time running short he let more of his anger at injustices through unsoftened as he had things he wanted to get said. And I think that also changes the books.

What I remember most of the later books is great elements rather than satisfying complete works. I love the Austen pastiche and the new Dwarf king turning out to be a woman.

And I absolutely love Goblin culture and the care with which is is drawn, like a cross between Japan, (non-Discworld) fairyland and Fungus the Bogeyman. And their names! So for me getting to meet the Goblins makes up for all the weaker plots and characters.

tribunalObserver · 27/07/2025 11:15

@NebulousSupportPostcard asked about the Miss Russell Advocate who acted for NHS Fife in a recent Fatal Accident Inquiry. Taking that as a minor challenge I looked into it, concluding (unsurprisingly) that it wasn't our Miss Russell - it was this one https://www.compasschambers.com/advocates/elaine-russell who has the case listed in her CV.

Elaine Russell - Compass Chambers

Since calling, Elaine has been well instructed in a range of Personal Injury, Clinical Negligence and Fatal Accident Inquiry work.

https://www.compasschambers.com/advocates/elaine-russell

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 27/07/2025 11:17

Waitwhat23 · 27/07/2025 09:44

Saw this. Anyone unsurprised by this (and other placards) at Trans Pride this weekend?

I suppose Steph is at least reluctantly acknowledging that you don't see placards like that at women's rights events.

Where i work, someone asked about Pride stickers to stick onto PPE.

I mean, it’s not like we’re strapped for cash, or anything. 🙄
And stickers actively reduce how effective that particular item of PPE is, which already has a limited shelf life.
Far be it from me to criticise some DEI dickhead who has no idea what they’re talking about.

Doing an Isla Bumba, shall we say!

Sorry. It’s just irritated me.
As you were.

Nachoinseachthu · 27/07/2025 11:18

InterrobangsArePureBias · 27/07/2025 09:48

Archive version
https://archive.ph/SDqfJ

Spot on for the likeness to Dreyfus. Both that and The Winslow Boy have come to mind regularly.

Great article. I’ve been thinking of the Winslow Boy all week.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 27/07/2025 11:20

SternlyMatthews · 27/07/2025 09:48

pp couldnt find the snickers child reference:

NC - did you work together frequently
SP - not often, but on the night of Halloween
NC - can you describe how that went
SP - a child was brought in, appeared to be in anaphylaxis from sweets they had been given
NC - how serious was his condition
SP - very serious, required urgent response from a consultant, Beth and myself
NC - so you had to work together, how was that
SP - we worked together as a doctor and nurse, we gave medications, took observations, monitored to patient's condition
NC - how was that
SP - I thought it was successful

https://archive.is/xkSxy#selection-1125.9-1163.41:~:text=NC%20%2D%20did%20you,it%20was%20successful

Edited

Snickers child was documented. Datable & identifiable so could find notes.

Upton's testimony after this insisted the 'resus incident' wasn't Snickers child. It was another un-named patient, on an unknown date, with an unremembered complaint. Therefore inpossible to find notes or witnesses.

As Upton would say, weird.

ickky · 27/07/2025 11:22

SternlyMatthews · 27/07/2025 09:15

oh dear! that should fill the thread nicely.
I've noticed over the years that it is easier to spread cream onto jam than vice versa, as jam on top doesnt stick to cream as you spread, so makes a bit of a mess.

This is why you have to shove into your mouth quicky.

If you put jam on first is leaks into the scone and makes it soggy.

Totallygripped · 27/07/2025 11:25

I am now wondering if cream is non-Newtonian. But on the subject of clotted I have very fond memories of visits to Granny in the 1960s. Not on scones but on green jelly. And with a slightly (delicious) grainy texture which i have never found in stuff you can get in supermarkets.

guinnessguzzler · 27/07/2025 11:30

SternlyMatthews · 27/07/2025 09:05

Good short piece from Euan McColm in the Scotman, on doctors & trust, with an honourable mention for Pete, & scathing on Searle & Upton, a consultant not a three year old, & not suitable for a doctors career, respectively.

https://archive.is/2cjIp

Thanks so much for sharing this, captures it all perfectly.

ThatDaringMintCritic · 27/07/2025 11:33

Catching up after a couple of days away. So much to take in my only comment is lemon curd on scones is a game changer (with clotted cream naturally).

BIWI · 27/07/2025 11:34

@Igneococcus we make raspberry gin - very easy! 1 litre of cheap gin (no point using expensive stuff). Put a punnet or two of raspberries into a glass jar or jug and pour gin over. Stir, then cover. Keep stirring occasionally for a couple of days, then pour (filtering it) back into the gin bottle. No need to add any sugar.

OP posts:
nauticant · 27/07/2025 11:37

end of thread

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread