Katy Montgomerie

[niadainud]

Just wondering what people think about her. I was sent a link by someone, and I do occasionally try to watch the views of pro-trans people for "balance", but I really struggled with this one.

I find her excessively pleased with herself, incoherent, ageist and of course prone to flinging around insults such as "TERF", "transphone" and "bigot" every few minutes.

I'm not quite sure what gives her the confidence to "diss" people like Helen Joyce, Richard Dawkins et al, as if they're idiots and she is some sort of intellectual giant.

She says things like this: "The UK's Supreme Court ruled on "biological sex", but they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. The "Gender Critical" position on biology is just factually wrong. Finally hundreds of experts in the field come together to call out all this anti-science rubbish"

Other than being trans herself, does she have any justifiable claim to the superior knowledge she purports to have?

I might take this a little more seriously if you didn't have a reputation for ridiculous hyperbole.

But if you tend to claim that misgendering is literal violence and other such absurdities, don't be surprised if people shrug when you really are talking about neo Nazis.

I prefer the version of feminism that revolves around actual women.

Which is also the only version of feminism.

We should warn J K Rowling that it's misogynistic to police and nitpick other women's appearance immediately!

Does she ? Or does she also correctly identify a male person by observing their male body cues?

Your deflection has been noted though. You fully support a male person who perpetuates misogyny as a sick gotcha.

Oh. Remember supporting an abusive male in their abuse of H
JK Rowling by censuring her reaction to that abuse is also an act of misogyny.

Is this what you are doing? Are you supporting male people in their abuse of JK Rowling because you disagree with her?

The only people who police and nitpick womens appearance are males.

I don't support the misgendering of anyone, trans or cis, and think that anyone who actively and maliciously misgenders others on a systematic basis while knowing full well the psychological harm it causes is in a very strange position to be throwing stones.

Women don't care if they get misgendered, Butterfly.

It's one of those things that literally only hurts because it's true.

I think you should tell that to the many nonconforming cis women who have reported how miserable it has been to use single sex facilities since the SC ruling gave every bigot in the country a green light to go out transvestigating to their heart's content

Yet you don't care about the psychological harm it does to women, girls and rape survivors who are gaslit to mis-sex a male, a member of their oppressor sex. That causes far greater psychological harm to actual females than a mantruming male not having a female cosplay in his fetish. We don't care how males feel. You males sure don't give a stuff how us females feel. You won't even answer questions. Which proves you post in bad faith.

so you’re happy to misgender people without a trans identity but frown on other correctly sexing those with a trans identity? Wow! So you are a hypocrite?

"I feel no threat from any trans person that might be in the toilets. I’ve never felt threatened by a trans person as it turns out.

The 69,958 thousand rapes that were reported between October 2023 and September 24 in the UK do slightly concern me, though.

91% of pеople prosecuted for sеxual offenses are cis men aged 18 plus. The biggest threat to cis women sadly comes from cis men.

Women are facing serious dangers not during boxing matches or from trans people needing a piss, but from actual violence that is carried out against them every week.

According to End Violence Against Women, every three days a woman is killed by a man
More than 100,000 girls are at risk and living with the consequences of FGM, forced marriage and honour based abuse

Kathryn Bromwich from the Guardian States that Trans people make up roughly 0.5% of the UK population and are twice as likely to be victims of crime than cis people
According to Home Office figures, this country has seen an increase in hate crimes towards trans people and cis women are supposed to focus on a threat we have yet to see manifest from a small minority of the country who are struggling to stay safe themselves."

-Kate Nash, GERM

Hahahaha. You’re funny. Or maybe you should listen to the many women happy they have single sex spaces free from misogynistic men demanding entry. Males do not belong in women’s spaces. However they identify.

How to you know they were cis men you bigot? Did you assume their gender??? I don’t know, you’re pushing the boundaries now of transphobia.

I see. So a woman who has been abused is required to further her abuse by submitting to her abuser’s demand to be referred to as a female when they are a male person?

This doesn’t surprise me at all. I understand that you cannot recognise the intricacies of consent. And this is part of consent.

You fully support female people being further abused by their abuser.

You cannot understand the inherent misogyny of using a JK Rowling’s image as a sick gotcha. And you support her abusers in perpetuating their abuse.

Kate Nash? PMSL. I wonder what Ms Nash would say to the victim of Kate Dolatowski, and all the other women and girls who were raped by transwomen in our spaces? This handmaiden does not speak for most women and girls. In fact, she speaks for none of us except herself on her hands and knees for males.

Besides it's not about being raped, it's about a rape survivor having to mis-sex a male and deny our lived experience as the oppressed sex, to satisfy the sexual fetish of the oppressor and predator sex who thinks wearing a dress makes a difference. I will never, ever, ever mis-sex a male, no matter how much they want to. My psychological health matters far more than their heartless fetish.

So what? Kate Nash is also abusive to women she doesn’t agree with.

You are now just supporting more abuse of female people.

The pattern has been set on numerous levels tonight.

The latest memo which sprang up from men bitter and resentful about the SC clarification - "I know, let's go with, 'thousands of women now afraid to use their own toilets because no-one can tell what sex they are if they don't have long hair and a dress. That'll work!'"

No-one believes it, Butters. No-one, not even you.

You mean the ones who are telling great big whoppers?

Because female people with short hair being challenged about their right to use women's toilets is such a likely consequence of the Supreme Court saying that male people with bad wigs shouldn't use them, isn't it?

You're really doubling down on the KF bit aren't you?

Considering I was asked often enough in my youth if I was a male, even while waiting to use toilets, I would say that this is nothing new. In fact, women and girls have always used queries such as this to safeguard their single sex spaces.

Not sure what wigs have to do with any of this, bad or otherwise?

Huh? What KF bit? Just cos you were being bigoted and assuming people’s gender? What has that got to do with me, KF or anything but your prejudices? I’d suggest some calm reflection and some shadow work. It may help you heal.

Well, this nonconforming woman is very happy with the SC ruling. We just need everyone to follow the rules. Males, however they identify, need to stay out of female single sex spaces and then I would be overjoyed.