From TT
CE - you accept its one explanation that DU is misleading
PD - I don't believe
CE - JB's report 1643 - scsh shows note in google account, dialogue box too, we see coloured box says hi elizabeth, can edited info sit behind that?
PD - edited time stamp? Yes that would be behind
CE - box 3, 3 sc sh side by side, cropped tightly
PD - yes
CE wider shots would show edit dates
PD - no they weren't there
CE - a little on how this exercise conducted. Propositions, agree/disagree. first most reliable way to ensure reliable/ integrthy - a forensic investigation
PD - yes
CE next best, in person you doing it
PD - wasn't asked
CE not a critisism, just another option, next best, you access files
PD - would have been beneficial
CE - next best, sit next to DU and watch what's done
PD - yes, next best but time limited
Fifer : so we're awready that far doon the league table of 'forensic backgroond' proper weys tae dae yer fuckin job - it's Hamilton Academical territory here.
CE - next best, remote access to DU files
PD - ?
CE - would have been 4th option
PD - i believe DU
CE - but an option
PD - yes
Fifer : Stirling Albion
CE next option, record teams call
PD - yes
CE - didn't happen
PD - no
CE - you went for the 6th best option
Fifer : Thornton Star Under 17s
PD - my assistence asked for just to get note
Fifer : can a jist remind the court. Forensic Backgroond. Ma [redacted] [redacted] eh [redacted] [redacted] [redacted]