From TT
CE - should be html files, but there aren't here
PD - no, was asked to produce files in quesiton
CE - no critisism, but there is info
PD - yes
CE - native files
PD - ???
CE - no metadata produced
PD - only screen shots
Fifer : Screen shots aye? The tool of the rank amateur. METADATA. DO YOU SPEAK IT?
CE - you didn't look
PD - no
CE - you dodnt enter artifacts
PD- no
JR - this is PD's document
CE - i don't
PD - DU produced the screenshots, I produced assistence
CE - you provided writtten guidance for DU, DU produced, you gave ?
PD - empty table,
CE - DU filled it in and returned to you?
PD - yes
CE - so DU produced it?
Fifer : very cosy. A few wee screenshots fae Dr Uption. "Backgroond in forensics", ye aw heard him say it. What is forensic aboot askin a body tae give us a screenshot. Fuckin nothing forensic aboot that, ah'll tell ye that for kirk a. So far fae forensic ye'd need tae git three different buses tae be able tae see forensic.
PD - I'm comfortable with it
Fifer : he's comfortable with it. Forensic backgroond, coupla jpgs, quite comfy. Fuckin dingy woosh.
CE - this doc you did create, response to JB report, wrote summary. Cannot give explanation for dates issue, but do not believe DU tried to mislead. You say you don't believe it, but it is one explanation?
PD - it's a possibility, but I didn't believe
Fifer : forensic backgroond, expert in takin the subject of a fuckin investigation's word for it and gettin sent a coupla fuckin jpgs. Are ye hearin this abject pish min.