It was very very clever of NC.
Rhianna has given a statement to AG disputing DUs account.
NC found evidence of KS being invited to meetings which would have meant she knew this.
KS says she can’t recall.
NC tried to get her to admit she meant with Rhianna AFTER that statement was given.
Which would mean witness tampering.
KS can’t recall when, no idea of time of year.
This was the very clever bit. KS has has to admit talking to R — how else would she know that she was wanting to be ‘kept out of it’.
She hasn’t clocked until NC questioning that this was going to land her in it. She can’t deny having the meeting.
KS getting upset again.
JR intervenes. J says I think we have got as far as we are going to get with this.
NC persists.
BOOM. KS hadn’t know R statement was in evidence in the bundle.
Realised it is very odd of witness to suddenly be concerned of SP racism after statement which was clear and contradicted BU so has to admit her meeting was after.
NC puts it to her that she was, my rephrasing and interpretation, trying to either get R to change her testimony to support BU or agree SP racist so she is concerned. R saying she wanted nothing to do with process could mean she want going to do what KS demanded of her.
Obviously JR hasn’t called her as R testimony undermined DU narrative.
KS admits in hindsight she shouldn’t have made it up met with R.