Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #39

1000 replies

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:23

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.
Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35
Thread 36 mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378031-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-36
Thread 37: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378200-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-37
Thread 38: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378463-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-38

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Chersfrozenface · 23/07/2025 18:02

KS is setting her credibility, and possibly her career, on fire for this mediocre man, and it is absolutely unbelievable. Maybe it’s a form of Stockholm syndrome?

  1. She didn't think for one moment that her credibility would be questioned. Did she not say at one point (and I'm paraphrasing) that she never thought her emails would end up as evidence in a tribunal?
  1. This is not just any old mediocre man, this is a trans mediocre man. She thought she was a heroine of The Right Side of History in pandering to him. Again, did she not pretty much wail at one point (paraphrasing again) "I was just beeeing kiiiind!"?
KnottyAuty · 23/07/2025 18:02

Enough4me · 23/07/2025 17:47

I'm curious, for those watching, has anything made you now see Upton as a woman or made you think Sandie was wrong to feel intimated by him?
I'm not seeing it in real time so wondered if I'm missing some revelations from the evidence?

Short answer no.
I started off assuming DU would be a very vulnerable character and that NHSF had done him and SP wrong by messing up their policy.
Then I saw DU on the witness stand and the scales fell from my eyes.
At 6ft1 with a male frame and the beginnings of male pattern baldness, DU was not one of the trans women who seamlessly pass.
Then there were a number of mannerisms - DU unfastening their jacket with one hand in that male businessman/member of the rotary club way.
Not realising that he was visible on camera as he tried to give NC hard/intimidating stares on the way to the door during breaks.
Arranging or agreeing to have his 2 friends sit behind NC to try to intimidate her and read her screen. They wouldn't move when NC asked. The judge had to intervene.
Vulnerable no longer seemed at all relevant to my perception of DU and that is before I get on to the completed wild things DU said under oath.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 23/07/2025 18:04

moto748e · 23/07/2025 18:00

One general point that strikes me is that NHSF have been continually criticised for not having a policy on this, or a procedure for that... But I would have thought that most of these policies (on trans staff, and much else) could/should be issued nationally by the NHS. Does each Health Trust really have responsibility for sorting its own policies and procedures? Does the NHS need to be a bit more Stalinist and centralised?

That really is one of the biggest problems with the NHS it's not National. It's around two hundred separate local fiefdoms all reinventing the wheel. They all invent their own policies (or not in the case of NHS Fife). They have different computer systems, different training, different policies etc etc

AMillionMugsNoTeabags · 23/07/2025 18:06

KnottyAuty’s description matches my opinion having seen DU’s evidence.
which I suppose is a small point in favour of KS; she can’t have cheated an watched DU’s evidence or she’d have known her “Beth is the loveliest, gentlest person eva” is risible to anyone who saw him at the tribunal.

anyolddinosaur · 23/07/2025 18:06

@Enough4me From the moment he arrived in a&e upton was keeping notes about any colleague who didnt do exactly as he wanted. He's an over 6 foot tall well connected middle class doctor, a former hockey player and Sandie, a 50 year old very much smaller (5ft 3?) woman was alone with him between her and the door. She had reason to fear him both physically and for what he could do to her career.

She'd tried to avoid him before but on Christmas Eve, stressed by the bleeding, she asked him to leave.

No, he doesnt act like a woman at all.

Largesso · 23/07/2025 18:06

Now I understand why NHS released the findings of the internal I/x the evening before the tribunal and why that expressed it as they did.

It becomes clearer and clearer that KS was doing a lot of manipulation behind the scenes but push came to shove when they realised her email to the consultants would be revealed.

They needed to get it out before credibility was fully lost. The entire I/x has been compromised by KS.

They have worded it as they have because the know DU is gearing up for their own ET for constructive dismissal and hostile working environment.

Their report on their finding did what they thought played both sides — it cleared SP but reprimanded her at same time.

Rhaidimiddim · 23/07/2025 18:07

yourhairiswinterfire · 23/07/2025 17:04

If you mean the homophobia and racism gossip, I think it will be disregarded, because she hasn't been reported or investigated for that in the 30 years she's been a nurse, they've produced no evidence for it, and it's not the reason she was suspended, investigated and possibly discriminated against. It has nothing to do with the tribunal.

But the allegations support the charge of harrassment.

Newtt · 23/07/2025 18:07

anyolddinosaur · 23/07/2025 17:56

The tears came when she realised that her statement that the witness was not going to get involved could actually be checked. It was also clearly false as the witness had made a statement and it didnt support Upton. So she was exposed as a liar who was trying to nobble a witness. I doubt she realised quite how serious that was. Perverting the course of justice is actually a criminal offence and I wonder if anyone will now be asking the Scottish Police to investigate.

Oh what karma it would be if she could be found guilty of a criminal offence and placed in a women’s prison.

I’m sure Kate would manage to work out if her cell mate was male or female quickly enough - without the need to check their chromosomes!!!!

HPFA · 23/07/2025 18:08

This tribunal has been fascinating in showing the different ways people react to being told to believe something they don't and can't.

Some like Sandie reject the belief entirely.

Some like Dr Searle try to force themselves to believe it and thus become very upset and angry when they're confronted with the fact it doesnt make sense.The Sandies must therefore be silenced.

Then there's Charlotte Myles who clearly doesnt believe it (and doesnt feel guilty about this) but thinks its kind to act as if she does. Hence shes able to be much more respectful to the Sandie position since shes not threatened by it.

At work those of my colleagues who've expressed an opinion on the trans issue are Charlottes, as is my daughter.

Me, I think I'm much too Sandie for the TRAs and probably too Charlotte for many on this board.

moto748e · 23/07/2025 18:08

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/07/2025 17:51

Or please don’t ask me to lie for you and DU, because I won’t do it.

From the POV of Rihanna, I'd say she had everything to lose and nothing to gain from getting involved, whatever her personal views. In her shoes, I'd be steering clear if I could.

KnottyAuty · 23/07/2025 18:08

Extravirginolive · 23/07/2025 17:48

That was me. I've worked with many of these types of senior people, they throw their weight around like bulls in a china shop and many of the people around them say nothing to them as they don't want to get trampled by the bull.

They think this means everyone agrees with them but everyone quite openly hates them and will very happy to see them pulled down. It's very hard to do this though and that can be extremely damaging to organisations to let these bullies dominate the culture. They sit in place for years with the dysfunction around them causing failure, turnover and poor performance.

I'm retiring shortly after 30 plus years in HR and I'm going to start writing publicly about this as it's not really dealt with in any useful way that I've seen.

I doubt many at Fife will have any genuine sympathy.

The tricky thing about this is probably that KS has no idea that this is the case. If you do write about it, especially if you are covering senior women, then do try to look at the alternative perspective. Noone will have told KS they don't like this behaviour so it's likely she will never have had a chance to consider behaving another way. It will be a horrible shock and I do feel sympathetic in that regard - although I don't like her attitude in the evidence today. But there is something specific about how women get a reputation the older and more powerful they get, which works against them. If you can dig into that and advise younger women on how to avoid that trap you would really be on to something!

Lins77 · 23/07/2025 18:09

I wonder how many other women were uncomfortable but didn't say anything. Maybe got changed in a toilet cubicle (I think it was referred to that some did that for whatever reason) or just quickly changed with eyes averted and left as quickly as possible. I'd guarantee it was quite a lot.

Kalalily · 23/07/2025 18:10

FatCyclist · 23/07/2025 17:28

Does KS have a trans child by any chance? Only possible reason I can think of for her actions.

i have been following when I get a chance but nowhere near up to date. However, this post caught my eye and I hope it is ok for me to comment. Speaking as the mother of a trans child with Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria in late teens, I think it is highly unlikely that KS has a trans child. If she did, she would likely have educated herself on the dangers of “be kind” and would recognise the danger in solidifying this social contagion by using requested pronouns etc.
How can a senior NHS doctor not have read the scientific literature, limited as it is, on this topic. I think there should be serious repercussions for any medic or teacher who does not fully inform themselves on all sides of the gender debate. There is too much at stake for our autistic young people, to whom we owe a duty of care.

Rhaidimiddim · 23/07/2025 18:10

ThreeWordHarpy · 23/07/2025 17:09

Wow. What an afternoon.

Regarding KS tears, as a TT reader they seemed to come out of nowhere. I can only agree with a PP who suggested it was the unconscious cognitive dissonance forcing her brain to try and reconcile the facts with her beliefs.

Compared to, for example, Jo Phoenix being very distressed as she gave evidence in her tribunal. Because not only was her evidence upsetting, it was triggering memories of when she was raped as a young woman and not believed and having to giving evidence in that case. A double whammy of emotions to deal with in a stressful situation. She was incredibly brave, especially as the OU barrister had very little compassion when questioning. So I did laugh at JR’s barb at NC’s people skills! Pure court drama.

Edited

It has being suggested she realised she was being led to a point where she had to tell the truth or perjure herself.

Enough4me · 23/07/2025 18:11

KnottyAuty · 23/07/2025 18:02

Short answer no.
I started off assuming DU would be a very vulnerable character and that NHSF had done him and SP wrong by messing up their policy.
Then I saw DU on the witness stand and the scales fell from my eyes.
At 6ft1 with a male frame and the beginnings of male pattern baldness, DU was not one of the trans women who seamlessly pass.
Then there were a number of mannerisms - DU unfastening their jacket with one hand in that male businessman/member of the rotary club way.
Not realising that he was visible on camera as he tried to give NC hard/intimidating stares on the way to the door during breaks.
Arranging or agreeing to have his 2 friends sit behind NC to try to intimidate her and read her screen. They wouldn't move when NC asked. The judge had to intervene.
Vulnerable no longer seemed at all relevant to my perception of DU and that is before I get on to the completed wild things DU said under oath.

Thanks it's interesting to hear beyond the photos and reports.
I thank luck (as I don't believe in God) that I haven't gone through what Sandie has gone through with this man to then be in court with him (& friends) still claiming him to be a woman.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/07/2025 18:12

tribunalObserver · 23/07/2025 17:43

In the fictionalised version of this tribunal, sexed-up to ensure viewing figures, surely the fictionalised KS figure will turn out to have been having an affair with thefictionalised BU figure. Trouble is, making that plausible on screen will require really careful casting of the BU figure, and some considerable departure from real life. Any ideas?

blessed GIF

Someone on X suggested Brian Blessed as BU, I think that’s hilarious 😂 you can imagine him going around bellowing ‘I am BIOLOGICAL, and my identity is FEMALE, therefore I am a BIOLOGICAL FEMALE’.

Cailleach1 · 23/07/2025 18:12

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/07/2025 16:36

He’s as kind as KS, we know she’s kind because she made a point of saying so earlier. My arse.

Reminds me of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. “I’m a good person”, was mentioned once or twice, by those who were involved in that scandal. We did also got performative tears once or twice, I seem to recall.

Namechangedagain999 · 23/07/2025 18:13

Just a thought that maybe BBC on GC side as anyone of these witnesses looking on BBC would think all is well? They’re like a double agent??

RedToothBrush · 23/07/2025 18:13

HPFA · 23/07/2025 18:08

This tribunal has been fascinating in showing the different ways people react to being told to believe something they don't and can't.

Some like Sandie reject the belief entirely.

Some like Dr Searle try to force themselves to believe it and thus become very upset and angry when they're confronted with the fact it doesnt make sense.The Sandies must therefore be silenced.

Then there's Charlotte Myles who clearly doesnt believe it (and doesnt feel guilty about this) but thinks its kind to act as if she does. Hence shes able to be much more respectful to the Sandie position since shes not threatened by it.

At work those of my colleagues who've expressed an opinion on the trans issue are Charlottes, as is my daughter.

Me, I think I'm much too Sandie for the TRAs and probably too Charlotte for many on this board.

Most of us started as Charlotte and then increasingly went "are you having a bloody laugh" and became Sandie.

SternlyMatthews · 23/07/2025 18:14

MarieDeGournay · 23/07/2025 14:53

JR has successfully challenged about 'prison' comment, that SP did refer to Bryson case at some point.
NC moving briskly along, but JR must be chuffed to have something stick!

The important thing about Bryson in that context is that he is the only well known troon whose picture was all over the papers with the outline of his willy showing through his tights, so he was actually used by SP as an example of a very male troon rather than as a rapist.

prh47bridge · 23/07/2025 18:14

KateShugakIsALegend · 23/07/2025 17:21

Judge not accepting that TW are men: Grounds for an appeal?

Edited

To reiterate, JR has made it clear that she intends to argue that the SC ruling only applies to representation on public bodies and does not apply here. The judge cannot say anything at this stage to suggest he has made up his mind on this point. Therefore, when NC argued that the SC ruling meant she could refer to Upton as a man, the judge could not agree. If he had, he would have given Fife grounds for appeal (assuming they lose). I'm not sure why NC referred to the Equality Act at this point. She could simply have pointed out that the judge had already ruled SP's team could use male pronouns to refer to Upton.

KateShugakIsALegend · 23/07/2025 18:15

RedToothBrush · 23/07/2025 18:13

Most of us started as Charlotte and then increasingly went "are you having a bloody laugh" and became Sandie.

This.

Absolutely this.

Justabaker · 23/07/2025 18:15

Waitwhat23 · 23/07/2025 15:58

There has been mention of stenographer's services being paid for by (I'm assuming) Sandie's team for the duration of this part of the tribunal.

I think this may have been prompted by NHS Fife's accusations that TT's tweets were inaccurate.

No, it was not for the benefit of TT or because of Rs fault finding with our work.

ET in Scotland - witnesses do not do written statements. Their evidence in chief is elicited through examination and then tested in cross examination. This means that copious notes are required or a transcript. They secured funding (I do not know how) to pay the steno team for the second half.

And given the kerfuffle about 'agreed facts' I say it's a good thing.

Bluebootsgreenboots · 23/07/2025 18:16

@Kalalily with you there.
As someone who has seen this ideology damage my family so deeply it is fascinating, cathartic but infuriating to see how the wild fire of this ‘theory’ has been blown through our young people, the flames being fanned by the idiocy and complacency of people who should know better - the Bumbas, Searles, Milnes, Davidsons of this world. And of course, the board who allow all this to go on, unchecked.
So when we as parents say ,’No, it’s not possible to change sex’ we are cast aside as young people look to those who are telling them what they want to hear.

Justabaker · 23/07/2025 18:17

ickky · 23/07/2025 15:59

I wonder if they will release the transcripts to the public once the judgement is in? Does anyone know if that could happen?

LGB Alliance paid for transcripts of the Mermaids action and then published these. It may be linked on TT Substack but not sure.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread