Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #38

1000 replies

nauticant · 22/07/2025 23:17

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35
Thread 36 mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378031-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-36
Thread 37: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378200-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-37

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 23/07/2025 10:43

It also, of course, either way almost wholly undermines the credibility of KS

... and everyone else on the chain who withheld it from their submissions?

RabbitFurCoat · 23/07/2025 10:43

Just remembered that episode of The IT Crowd where Roy gets stuck in a disabled loo and pretends to be 'leg disabled'. The escalating lies, the reversion to childishness to avoid being caught out. It haunts me. I cringe. And that's just comedy pretend. I reckon you have to be missing a chip to beg victim status deceptively.

Zebracat · 23/07/2025 10:44

I would pay good money for a description of NC’s body language upon hearing “ you can’t prove it” from KS.

EdithStourton · 23/07/2025 10:45

guinnessguzzler · 23/07/2025 09:39

Well you must know what to do with a courgette, particularly given all this talk of henopausal double yolkers ... 'for goodness sake, you've a courgette fritatta': Eggs make a meal out of anything

Right, dinner solved for Thursday evening.
Head of Catering can have the evening off!

TigersAreBetterLookingThanNHSFife · 23/07/2025 10:46

As things haven't started up yet... I am curious about what Vic Valentine's involvement was. What did any of this have to do with the Equality Network or Scottish Trans Alliance?

maltravers · 23/07/2025 10:46

InvisibleDragon · 23/07/2025 09:41

Agree the fawning is ridiculous - I think it also shows it up as posturing.

Horrible managers being totally unreasonable and refusing bereavement leave etc notwithstanding, most people's experience of needing allowances for personal trauma/grief/medical issues at work is that these are managed as discreetly as possible to protect the privacy of the individual involved. Not relaying all the details to 20 senior staff and sharing widely across the whole department!

I assume the need to virtue signal and cow any dissent stopped Dr S from behaving discreetly. Sound the klaxons! I am an ally, one of the virtuous and will hunt down any who disagree (or misbehave by leaving changing rooms - how dare they)!

girlghostbusters · 23/07/2025 10:46

I'm sure many have mentioned this, but what is wild to me is that the consultants themselves were responsible for looking deciding what to submit.

I was involved in an NHS tribunal that required a subject access request to locate files for discovery. For this, the claimant had to provide the keywords needed and the people to pull from during a particular time period.

For example, the order was "find all emails sent in the last 6 months from Honoria Glossop, Gussie Fink-Nottle, and Roderick Spode that include the phrases 'Bertie Wooster' or 'Bertie' or 'Chief Tippling Officer.'" It took the Trust about 6 months to get IT to pull the files then get them reviewed by some data/governance person who blacked out all the lines not relevant or potentially violating GDPR, and then those 500 partly blacked-out pages were delivered as part of the bundle.

I can't imagine why they thought the doctors themselves here were the right people to sort through their own emails (that clearly made them look like class a arseholes) to decide what to submit. I get if it's an employer with 3 employees and no IT team, but this is ridiculous.

INeedAPensieve · 23/07/2025 10:47

Nameychangington · 23/07/2025 09:21

As a counter point to the kid glove treatment of Dr Upton having multiple chats with senior staff in the wellness room, 20 consultants being informed of the hate crime against him in case he needed to go home in the middle of a shift or not come in at all, being escorted to his car by a consultant etc etc I give you the experience of a colleague of mine.

When she was a junior doctor, younger than Dr Upton is, her mother died, and her consultant refused her the day off for her mother's funeral. She had to scrabble around and find a colleague who agreed to swap. Once she'd done that, she informed the consultant who very huffily said 'oh all right, you can make the time up the next day'.

She was just a boring standard kind of female junior doctor and she'd only lost a parent not been asked not to use a changing room she didn't belong in though, so not really as terrible an experience as Dr Upton endured that had all of these senior female staff dancing attendance on him.

That is fucking enraging. I'm so sorry your colleague had to deal with that.

And this is what makes me so angry about DrU and all his enablers. There was absolutely fuck all wrong with him. He was throwing a strop like a three year old because as a man he should not have been using the women's changing room. Yet due to growing his hair long and putting on a nice pair of tights and saying the magic special words "I'm a woman actually" he was pandered to and fawned over like the second coming.

All of these women who did this and enabled him should be ashamed. What a joke.

It was a good few threads back now that I saw a comment from a doctor (or a consultant I think) who listed quite matter of factly all the utterly awful things that she had had to deal with in her working life (truly traumatic events, death etc) and had just been expected to suck it up, as that's the job. Any crying from her would have been seen as a weakness. Yet this entitled Dr gets to wail that a nurse isn't undressing in front of him and has the AUDACITY to ask him to leave the changing room and it's like he's some poor soul in need of a warm blanket round him.

I'm not in the medical setting at all, but I have a lot of friends who are, and as well as denying the reality of biological sex, this pandering to a non-event would tip me over the edge if I was. How dare he. How dare all of those women pander to him. Proves that society knows exactly who the men are and exactly who the women are when it really matters.

Firealarms · 23/07/2025 10:48

I’m curious about what the tribunal thinks in all this, ie how balanced/unbiased legal professionals are processing the witness evidence.

For example on the surface, I think KS was coached on what to say. I’m just wondering what impact her verbal evidence had, given the written evidence seemed damming about her poor actions.

TheFifersSupportWren · 23/07/2025 10:48

Just wanting to check in for KSD2 - what treats are we going to get today?

And to add: Celeriac mash is delicious with anything lamb-y. Needs gravy, and greens. I use half potatoes half celeriac if there are kids / fussy palates involved.

Does anyone have a good (as in tasty) courgette-in-a-cake recipe? I also have a marrow large courgette from a friend’s garden that I need to use up.

hholiday · 23/07/2025 10:48

NebulousDogwhistle · 23/07/2025 09:31

I'm still agog and flabbers gasted at Dr Searle saying "you can't prove it" to Naomi Cunningham. Naomi Cunningham

And then the whole 'trust me, I'm a doctor' shtick. So were Harold Shipman and Simon Bromhall but we're not holding them up as pillars of society, are we?

For that matter, didn’t SP’s previous bad experience come at the hands of a doctor. If I were her, I’d be rather cynical about their code of conduct

MyAmpleSheep · 23/07/2025 10:49

maltravers · 23/07/2025 10:46

I assume the need to virtue signal and cow any dissent stopped Dr S from behaving discreetly. Sound the klaxons! I am an ally, one of the virtuous and will hunt down any who disagree (or misbehave by leaving changing rooms - how dare they)!

There does indeed appear to have been a lot of “behold my virtue”

Firealarms · 23/07/2025 10:49

girlghostbusters · 23/07/2025 10:46

I'm sure many have mentioned this, but what is wild to me is that the consultants themselves were responsible for looking deciding what to submit.

I was involved in an NHS tribunal that required a subject access request to locate files for discovery. For this, the claimant had to provide the keywords needed and the people to pull from during a particular time period.

For example, the order was "find all emails sent in the last 6 months from Honoria Glossop, Gussie Fink-Nottle, and Roderick Spode that include the phrases 'Bertie Wooster' or 'Bertie' or 'Chief Tippling Officer.'" It took the Trust about 6 months to get IT to pull the files then get them reviewed by some data/governance person who blacked out all the lines not relevant or potentially violating GDPR, and then those 500 partly blacked-out pages were delivered as part of the bundle.

I can't imagine why they thought the doctors themselves here were the right people to sort through their own emails (that clearly made them look like class a arseholes) to decide what to submit. I get if it's an employer with 3 employees and no IT team, but this is ridiculous.

this is how all government department deal with SARs, rightly or wrongly

borntobequiet · 23/07/2025 10:49

nauticant · 23/07/2025 10:36

I wonder if this is going to be one of the things JR will be putting work in to in her re-examination. JR will be very keen to repair this but doing so could go badly wrong and in any case will end up drawing even more attention to something JR would like to be made less visible.

JR may be a superstar barrister’s barrister, but not much of what she does seems very clever to this watching layperson. In fact her hectoring, accusatory tone and frequent seemingly inadvertent exposure of the weaknesses of her client’s case look rather amateurish. But what do I know.

Disclaimer: I’m not actually watching watching, just “watching” via TT, MN and other channels.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 23/07/2025 10:50

TheFifersSupportWren · 23/07/2025 10:48

Just wanting to check in for KSD2 - what treats are we going to get today?

And to add: Celeriac mash is delicious with anything lamb-y. Needs gravy, and greens. I use half potatoes half celeriac if there are kids / fussy palates involved.

Does anyone have a good (as in tasty) courgette-in-a-cake recipe? I also have a marrow large courgette from a friend’s garden that I need to use up.

Flora's famous courgette cake by Nigella is delicious

MyAmpleSheep · 23/07/2025 10:52

girlghostbusters · 23/07/2025 10:46

I'm sure many have mentioned this, but what is wild to me is that the consultants themselves were responsible for looking deciding what to submit.

I was involved in an NHS tribunal that required a subject access request to locate files for discovery. For this, the claimant had to provide the keywords needed and the people to pull from during a particular time period.

For example, the order was "find all emails sent in the last 6 months from Honoria Glossop, Gussie Fink-Nottle, and Roderick Spode that include the phrases 'Bertie Wooster' or 'Bertie' or 'Chief Tippling Officer.'" It took the Trust about 6 months to get IT to pull the files then get them reviewed by some data/governance person who blacked out all the lines not relevant or potentially violating GDPR, and then those 500 partly blacked-out pages were delivered as part of the bundle.

I can't imagine why they thought the doctors themselves here were the right people to sort through their own emails (that clearly made them look like class a arseholes) to decide what to submit. I get if it's an employer with 3 employees and no IT team, but this is ridiculous.

Who better than a group of 100% trustworthy doctors (who are overseen by the GMC, you know) to mark their own homework?

MsGoodenough · 23/07/2025 10:53

Beowulfa · 23/07/2025 10:27

The panicked " you can't prove it" from KS yesterday reminded me of the "I didn't do it, nobody saw me do it, you can't prove anything" Bart Simspon t-shirt I had when I was 12.

Or "we didn't see anything, and Captain Blackadder did not shoot this delicious plump- breasted pigeon"

Totallygripped · 23/07/2025 10:53

I only alighted on these threads a week ago and don't have the detailed background knowledge which many others do. But I still can't get my head round why there was so much investment in DU. I don't know enough about junior doctor rotations. Was he bound to spend whole career in Fife/that A&E dept? Not that that would alter fundamental issues at stake here. Be kind vs Be horrid (to SP).

GreenFriedTomato · 23/07/2025 10:53

@Needspaceforlego The first email must have something in it the 6 of them colluded in. Something that is really really damaging to them all.
They've had two chances to cough it up. They've clearly discussed it with the comment that KS made.

Apologies if this has been answered- I'm still catching up with last night's posts.

So is the first email of this chain still missing then?

I remember NC saying that one of Searle's emails looked like it was the start but it didn't make sense that the subject title has Re; in it.
Another part of the chain (initially hidden by all 6 ?) had the evidence of colluding/foot in mouth etc?

So I'm still not following. Is the issue that they intentionally cut off the foot in mouth email - because as part of the chain they would have deliberately needed to cut it off as it would naturally have been included in the rest of the chain.
Is it that the initial email is still missing? Or is it both?

I am still rather confused as to exactly what the issues are with this email business.

anyolddinosaur · 23/07/2025 10:55

. @kittykarate JR tried to claim Naomi was on a "fishing expedition" to avoid further disclosure. The judge wouldnt have it in February and he is not going to think he was wrong now.

NotMyRealAccount · 23/07/2025 10:55

I once tried using slices of celeriac instead of pasta in a lasagne when a family member was low-carbing. It was more convincing and less mushy than trying to make spaghetti from courgettes or rice from cauliflower.

(I suspect my intelligent, science-trained, non-diabetic sibling would prefer not to be reminded of the time she looked terrified when presented with a plate that had boiled carrots on it because of the sugar in them. And is it right that posting a bit of irrelevance among the on-topic material trips up the bots that are trying to scrape the thread?)

SigourneyHoward · 23/07/2025 10:57

Courgette recipe contribution here! 5oclockapron on insta (chef name Clare Thompson) did a cluster of courgette recipes last summer.
also Ed Smith has a banger of a slow cooked courgette, white beans, mint, goats cheese summer dish that is light and brothy and makes me happy!

Firealarms · 23/07/2025 10:57

borntobequiet · 23/07/2025 10:49

JR may be a superstar barrister’s barrister, but not much of what she does seems very clever to this watching layperson. In fact her hectoring, accusatory tone and frequent seemingly inadvertent exposure of the weaknesses of her client’s case look rather amateurish. But what do I know.

Disclaimer: I’m not actually watching watching, just “watching” via TT, MN and other channels.

Edited

I actually think in the legal profession, a lot of success comes down to being convincing/manipulating perception/having a face that fits. Getting the tribunal to buy into you and what you have to say sort of thing. I’m not saying she’s doing a good job, just that it‘s not about being clever or smart; it’s about timing, being dynamic, controlling the overall narrative etc

Needspaceforlego · 23/07/2025 10:57

MarieDeGournay · 23/07/2025 10:28

Ah it's not bad, as online insults go !

for non Gaelic speakers: it means 'Aren't you an eejit!'.
Note that 'oinseach' is a female eejit, there's a different word for a male eejit, i.e. 'amadán'Smile
There's no sign of anything happening on TT, so we're allowed a bit of irrelevant chat without irritating anyone, I hope?
For the record: I am agnostic on celery.

Tapadh leat,
Duolingo the hasn't taught me the words for eejit!

prh47bridge · 23/07/2025 10:57

BezMills · 23/07/2025 10:31

@Needspaceforlego yes, on an SD card, let's guess using a FAT32 file system, the sectors containing file data are not scrubbed, only the records in the File Allocation Table. Unless those sectors are written over, the files are still there, just no longer linked from the File Allocation Table, and can be reconstituted by clever software. Which can be super handy if you're trying to get your photies off a corrupt device.

Deleted data can be recovered regardless of the file system used. For a flash drive, USB stick or SSD, deleted data sticks around longer than with magnetic hard drives, so can be recovered with the right equipment.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread