Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #37

1000 replies

nauticant · 22/07/2025 15:39

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.
Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35
Thread 36 mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378031-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-36

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
DuesToTheDirt · 22/07/2025 23:06

Namechangedagain999 · 22/07/2025 22:04

She also asked LC about this and apparently LC didn’t know what re: meant.

Surely an adult not knowing what "re:" means is on a par with a medical specialist not being able to tell the sex of babies? or indeed themselves

Tandora · 22/07/2025 23:06

WithSilverBells · 22/07/2025 23:04

You are completely out of your depth in everything you post.

And yet I’m extremely educated on the topic at hand. Just like all those “captured” medics and scientists and academics you keep complaining about eh? Funny that.

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 22/07/2025 23:07

@WithSilverBells me too! I hate celery but love celeriac. Celeriac and pear soup is the best!

Need to start a campaign that only doctors who have a clear idea on how to differentiate between male and female get promotion & payrises. Those doctors who say ooh that’s tricky get zilch. The rubbish that has been spouted in this tribunal does not given the general public confidence in their abilities.

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 22/07/2025 23:09

Or as one of my colleagues says gender ideology is intellectual wanking.

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 22/07/2025 23:11

Cailleach1 · 22/07/2025 22:37

Sure. As long as my investment is what I say it is too.

Sure, all are welcome at GenderBank

Needspaceforlego · 22/07/2025 23:15

nauticant · 22/07/2025 21:42

Years ago doing university exams I finally realised that if, instead of reading what I was supposed to be revising, I read it and summarised it in longhand, my recollection in comparison was extraordinary and I only needed to do this once rather than read and read and read again.

Me too, I remember things much better if is write it down, so I do think its part of his memory process.
He needs to remember stuff from February,
However many cases he's listened to between then and now.
Plus this couple of weeks.

KnottyAuty · 22/07/2025 23:15

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 22/07/2025 21:30

There is a place for celeriac, finely chopped in a strong tomato broth as the base of a fine soupe de poisson
Celery is not an option here due to its fibrous substructure

50-50 potato and celeriac mash is good as a topping on a veggie/lentil based cottage pie topped with grated Parmesan. Have t made that for years as the kids loathe veggie dishes unfortunately

Enough4me · 22/07/2025 23:15

This case will peak people and they'll never go back.
I still remember an article by Keira Bell reflecting on how, at a vulnerable time, her decision making was badly influenced. Being encouraged to believe she had a fault that could be fixed was like finding a solution. It was worse than snake oil and over time she's had a longer path to a peaceful life than she could have had.

I'm hoping Sandie wins and it's reported loudly and clearly so young people read that sex is reality and it matters. We need more reality and less misleading for the benefit of the younger generations as well as all women.

JanesLittleGirl · 22/07/2025 23:16

Tandora · 22/07/2025 20:01

BBC, NHS Fife and BMC all “captured”. Or….

Secondly, why are NHS Fife trying so hard to smear SP’s character? I don’t get it. Do we only allow women the single-sex spaces they’re legally entitled to if they are lovely delicate flowers who wouldn’t say boo to a goose?

Part of SP’s claim is discrimination related to a “protected belief”. If the NHS can demonstrate that she wasn’t suspended due to a protected belief, but rather due to behaving in a bigoted / discriminatory manner then they can successfully defend this part of the lawsuit.

Are you sure that Ms Peggie is claiming discrimination related to a 'protected belief'? I must have missed it in the original claim.

DuesToTheDirt · 22/07/2025 23:17

MrsOvertonsWindow · 22/07/2025 21:43

Good grief! The levels of capture in the bloody MoD fgs. Civil servants repeatedly breaching the legal requirement to be impartial by spouting trans activist hate and nonsense (no doubt in work time).

That's a horrendous and very revealing judgment. Well worth reading (or maybe Maya's summary as it's very long) - especially if you're in any workplace where you're required to be politically impartial yet are surrounded by bigoted transactivists.

That's quite the read. (I just looked at Maya's tweets.) Basically, you can have a gender-critical belief as long as you don't tell anyone about it! (Then how would they know?)

RedNine · 22/07/2025 23:17

Well it has been quite the day in court, hasn't it.

ifIwerenotanandroid · 22/07/2025 23:17

WithSilverBells · 22/07/2025 22:56

... calling the electromagnetic spectrum 'linear' shows a lack of understanding too.

Hate celery, love celeriac

& fennel is indispensable.

WithSilverBells · 22/07/2025 23:18

Delphigirl · 22/07/2025 21:29

He needs to keep notes (a) to stay focussed and (b) because the act of writing notes puts it all in his memory much more effectively than merely listening. Also he will be writing comments to himself on the witnesses’ demeanour, etc.

That's why commercial revision guides are such a bad idea. Make your own revision guide if you really want to remember something.

KateShugakIsALegend · 22/07/2025 23:18

BouncyCastleNHSSquirrels · 22/07/2025 22:56

This is one of the reasons for the prolific posting.

That poster is able to turn any thread they post on into the "look at me!" show.

They are a bad faith poster who makes a reasonable enough show of "just wanting to contribute to the discussion" to keep drawing replies.

If people want to have this discussion again* *that's fine, I'd prefer it if it could be done on another thread because I've read it all before, more than once.

Alternatively if anyone wants to skip to the end of the book as it were, the advanced search function on a poster's name will show up threads where these discussions have taken place before.

Thank you

Tandora · 22/07/2025 23:18

JanesLittleGirl · 22/07/2025 23:16

Are you sure that Ms Peggie is claiming discrimination related to a 'protected belief'? I must have missed it in the original claim.

Yes there were four claims : sexual harassment, indirect discrimination, discrimination related to a protected belief , and one more I can’t remember - also of the harassment variety I think..

KnottyAuty · 22/07/2025 23:18

nauticant · 22/07/2025 21:42

Years ago doing university exams I finally realised that if, instead of reading what I was supposed to be revising, I read it and summarised it in longhand, my recollection in comparison was extraordinary and I only needed to do this once rather than read and read and read again.

Write once. Read twice.
i think there’s a latin version but I’m not that posh

FleurFloor · 22/07/2025 23:19

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 22/07/2025 22:34

Aye yes but you see, she is a doctor and therefore trustworthy because she follows the GMC.

It was odd that she appealed to this with such wide eyes certainty.

If this tribunal has shown us anything, it is that we put professionals on a pedestal and their behaviour often does not warrant the trust we put in them.

Fife has put forward a multitude of witnesses who we would all willingly trust with our lives, our children's lives and our parents lives. We would give their opinion significant weight when making potentially life altering decisions and we would share with them deeply personal and intimate details of our backstory and medical history.

And yet they have all at times been evasive, combative, truculent, and there is extensive evidence of unpleasantness towards their colleagues. They have all lacked the courage to speak plainly about what they surely know about biological sex and it's importance. They have all spoken with fierce determination to double down on the way they have treated a single lone woman.

If nothing else, this case has seriously damaged the way I will feel about hcps in the future. Knowing that there are this many of them who would treat me differently because I don't think men become women on their say so is unnerving for a start.

BabaYagasHouse · 22/07/2025 23:19

ItisntOver · 22/07/2025 21:22

Today’s reading that is relevant to a number of issues raised in this thread, and casts an interesting sidelight on the potentially self-harming to reputation behaviour of some witnesses.

This essay is a compilation of different frameworks and considerations, like a basic reader for the topic of suicidal empathy.

Hannah Arendt and Thoughtless Compassion

Hannah Arendt offers a middle path between Nietzsche’s skepticism and Levinas’s idealism. In her exploration of the "banality of evil," Arendt warned against actions motivated by collective sentiment without critical examination. For her, compassion can be dangerous when it is unmoored from thought and reason. Even the best intentions, if not carefully considered, can perpetuate harm rather than alleviate it. Arendt’s insights are particularly relevant to the concept of suicidal empathy. She would caution against compassion that is performative or uncritical compassion that seeks to soothe immediate suffering without addressing the broader implications of its actions. For example, policies that prioritize empathy for individuals accused of wrongdoing without regard for their victims’ risk undermining the very principles of justice that sustain social order.
Arendt’s work reminds us that empathy must be guided by reason to support justice rather than enable harm. Compassion, in her view, is not inherently good; it becomes good only when it is informed by careful thought and a commitment to fairness. Her philosophy underscores the importance of balancing emotional responses with intellectual rigor.

From: Suicidal Empathy: The Danger of Compassion Without Limits —on ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385740873_Suicidal_Empathy_The_Danger_of_Compassion_Without_Limits?

And an upcoming book by Gad Saad.

Thank you for this.

Wonderful to have what we are witnessing so well articulated.

MyAmpleSheep · 22/07/2025 23:20

Tandora · 22/07/2025 23:18

Yes there were four claims : sexual harassment, indirect discrimination, discrimination related to a protected belief , and one more I can’t remember - also of the harassment variety I think..

victimisation: being subjected to a detriment for having made a protected disclosure (i.e. being treated worse because you made a claim of discrimination or harrassment.)

moto748e · 22/07/2025 23:20

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 22/07/2025 23:07

@WithSilverBells me too! I hate celery but love celeriac. Celeriac and pear soup is the best!

Need to start a campaign that only doctors who have a clear idea on how to differentiate between male and female get promotion & payrises. Those doctors who say ooh that’s tricky get zilch. The rubbish that has been spouted in this tribunal does not given the general public confidence in their abilities.

Those doctors who say ooh that’s tricky shouldn't be doctors.

nauticant · 22/07/2025 23:20

This thread has been annoyingly derailed, and if this continues it might get filled up before morning. As a precaution I've set up the continuation thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378463-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-38

Can this thread continue to be used before people move over to the new thread? Thanks.

OP posts:
Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 22/07/2025 23:21

moto748e · 22/07/2025 23:20

Those doctors who say ooh that’s tricky shouldn't be doctors.

Absolutely. The process can start up in NHS Fife

DuesToTheDirt · 22/07/2025 23:22

Tandora · 22/07/2025 23:06

And yet I’m extremely educated on the topic at hand. Just like all those “captured” medics and scientists and academics you keep complaining about eh? Funny that.

Like these medics in the tribunal who don't even know their own sex? Those medics?

Tandora · 22/07/2025 23:22

MyAmpleSheep · 22/07/2025 23:20

victimisation: being subjected to a detriment for having made a protected disclosure (i.e. being treated worse because you made a claim of discrimination or harrassment.)

Thank you

moto748e · 22/07/2025 23:24

FleurFloor · 22/07/2025 23:19

It was odd that she appealed to this with such wide eyes certainty.

If this tribunal has shown us anything, it is that we put professionals on a pedestal and their behaviour often does not warrant the trust we put in them.

Fife has put forward a multitude of witnesses who we would all willingly trust with our lives, our children's lives and our parents lives. We would give their opinion significant weight when making potentially life altering decisions and we would share with them deeply personal and intimate details of our backstory and medical history.

And yet they have all at times been evasive, combative, truculent, and there is extensive evidence of unpleasantness towards their colleagues. They have all lacked the courage to speak plainly about what they surely know about biological sex and it's importance. They have all spoken with fierce determination to double down on the way they have treated a single lone woman.

If nothing else, this case has seriously damaged the way I will feel about hcps in the future. Knowing that there are this many of them who would treat me differently because I don't think men become women on their say so is unnerving for a start.

I don't blame you at all. I don't think it's anything less than a cancer in the NHS. Which can (has, according to a post upthread) cost lives.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.