Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lesbian mistaken for trans woman in woman's bathroom in Arizona

1000 replies

Christinapple · 05/03/2025 10:53

https://www.advocate.com/news/lesbian-mistaken-transgender-arizona-walmart

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/masculine-looking-cis-woman-confronted-by-cops-in-walmart-restroom-kalaya-morton-demands-justice-video/ar-AA1AdWpn

But I thought people "can always tell"?

It also led to the irony the only males in the bathroom were two male police officers who were notified by a store employee who mistakenly thought a male had entered the woman's toilets.

"In an alarming incident at a Tucson, Arizona Walmart, 19-year-old Kalaya Morton*, a Black cisgender lesbian, was confronted by two male sheriff’s deputies while using the women’s restroom, sparking outrage and a demand for accountability.
Morton, who identifies as masculine-presenting or a “stud,” recounted the humiliating encounter that occurred when a store employee erroneously assumed she was a transgender woman. The saga began innocuously enough: Morton had entered the restroom with her ex-girlfriend, who was kindly handing her a tampon— an act of friendship that, unfortunately, soon spiraled into something far more troubling. In an exclusive interview with The Advocate, Morton detailed her shock when the two deputies barged in, shining flashlights into the restroom stall.

“You have to get out of here. You have to come out. We need to talk to you.” Imagine trying to pee in peace, only to have the police storm in like it’s an episode of Cops: Restroom Edition.
“I’m still using the restroom. I’m sitting down, I’m peeing. What is the issue?,” Morton incredulously told the deputies as she sat there.
Now, while most people hope for a streamlined bathroom experience, Morton was treated more like a suspect than a bathroom user. The deputies apparently needed to crack the case of “Who Looks Like a Man in the Ladies’ Room,” a particularly absurd mystery, if you ask us."

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
MarieDeGournay · 05/03/2025 16:39

WaitingForTheDoubleDecker · 05/03/2025 14:16

😄 The bus joke was worth it. Forgot I chose this username.

Oh, I'm familiar with the general schtick. So long as you humbly accept your place as a GNC woman, put up with people banging on the cubicle door or grabbing at you (which is just 'challenging' you, not harassing) you get a gold sticker for being a good little ideological shield to show that GCs are accepting of gender non conformity. Well, some of them. Cos they're not a homogenous blob and quite a lot of them think that if they don't approve of how you look, you deserve everything you get, especially if you're one of those masculine lesbians. Also, it doesn't happen, it's no big deal, you're probably lying, or you are actually a man, and if it did happen, you're to blame.

Fwiw, I no longer use the women's because I'm also pragmatic. I'm just boggled by the rhetorical trajectory taken by many here. And sure, you personally may still be keen to be seen as a woman and you code that in western appearance standards, but this is precisely why trans identities are part of lesbian subculture, because butches often have to choose between making conformity concessions or being entirely pushed out.

Also, you don't dial up your butchness to stud. If you're white, you're a butch, if you're Black, you might use stud. Many younger lesbians will tend to just use 'masc'.

I would have replied soon, but I was out getting my hair cut, at the local barbers.

I think you and I probably agree on the value of a good sense of humour, a bit of pragmatism, and a sharp haircut Grin

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:40

Catiette · 05/03/2025 16:34

Well, quite. It's that very context that makes it so remarkable to see posters pointedly "Wow"-ing in response to the argument that we'd rather suffer - and, with great reluctance, tolerate other women suffering - personal offence than, well, massively increase our vulnerability to rape or murder. (I mean, wow. That's a helluva thing for us to believe, isn't it?)

Are you just ignoring the vulnerability of an innocent black woman having the police called on her, in a country with such high rates of police violence towards black people?

Catiette · 05/03/2025 16:41

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:33

Please oh logical one explain to us the logic of inviting male police into a single sex spaces to police this woman. Is there no consistency ?

😁

My very logical response (so much so that I suspect you know this already) is...

In this particular circumstance, I've no idea - I wasn't there. I can hypothesise, as people have, that this was an attempt to safeguard women against what appeared to be an unknown man, with the additional reassurances of the police call having been logged, and the attending officers greeted and probably escorted by the caller, all of which would provide additional safeguards offsetting any risk presented by the police officers to make it self-evidently worth "inviting them in" to check on an unknown random male entering a private female space (as perceived).

In more general terms, though, "invite" is a bizarre word, and I'd see no logic to it at all. I honestly doubt the police would RSVP to a gilded card. 😁 "Accept the necessity of male officers, if female officers weren't available, to prevent a potentially far greater harm" would be a more "logical" alternative to this.

Unless one were being disingenuous, of course.

JazzyJelly · 05/03/2025 16:42

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:36

Is it just male police officers you don't object to in female facilities?

I actually don't define myself or my feminism on a a niche issue so no, I wouldn't call myself a TERF.

Someone asking PP or yourself to explain their logic on these facilities is only shit posting to you if you have an issue explaining your logic or reasoning.

I don't object to the emergency services responding to an incident in a public space, no. Would you like to answer to my question? Do you object to all males in female spaces, or just the police doing their jobs?

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:45

JazzyJelly · 05/03/2025 16:42

I don't object to the emergency services responding to an incident in a public space, no. Would you like to answer to my question? Do you object to all males in female spaces, or just the police doing their jobs?

This wasn't an incident - what was the crime that occured (an actual crime please) that justified them attending inside the facilities? You're acting like they were in there saving a life.
I'm objecting to all males in female facilities - why aren't you?

ScholesPanda · 05/03/2025 16:46

I think there is an interesting point to be made about feminist perspectives on clothing.

On the one hand I'm very much 'clothes are clothes', wear what you want, men can wear skirts etc. I would like to think that I would be fine with any female in the women's toilets, regardless of how they looked or presented.

However, on the other hand it's not true is it? Clothes aren't just clothes, or there wouldn't be a multi-billion pound industry selling them. They can signal all kinds of things about us- social status, wealth, eco-consciousness, musical taste. So people, including me, do use these visual clues as a guide to who we are dealing with.

So, I guess for me, absolutely use the women's toilets if you are a female who has made themselves look very masculine, you have as much right as me to do so. But don't get annoyed if I do a double-take or if you get politely challenged. That's me keeping myself safe, and that's ok too.

Maybe these thoughts make me a bad feminist though.

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:46

Catiette · 05/03/2025 16:41

😁

My very logical response (so much so that I suspect you know this already) is...

In this particular circumstance, I've no idea - I wasn't there. I can hypothesise, as people have, that this was an attempt to safeguard women against what appeared to be an unknown man, with the additional reassurances of the police call having been logged, and the attending officers greeted and probably escorted by the caller, all of which would provide additional safeguards offsetting any risk presented by the police officers to make it self-evidently worth "inviting them in" to check on an unknown random male entering a private female space (as perceived).

In more general terms, though, "invite" is a bizarre word, and I'd see no logic to it at all. I honestly doubt the police would RSVP to a gilded card. 😁 "Accept the necessity of male officers, if female officers weren't available, to prevent a potentially far greater harm" would be a more "logical" alternative to this.

Unless one were being disingenuous, of course.

Edited

So to clarify you are okay with males entering a female facility when no crime has occured or been reported as long as they are dressed as police officers? And you're okay with one singular woman consenting to that access on all the other women's behalves?

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 16:48

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:15

Nope not me and I also never called you a bigot. This wasn't a trans identified man - it was a woman. It wasn't even someone accusing someone of being a trans identified man was it? They suspected it was a man. It's almost like men don't actually have to pretend to be women if they wanted to access a toilet to harm a woman..

And you still don't get to consent for me for male cops to be brought into the woman's toilets. What if I was washing out my soaked period underwear in there for example?

If you were in the female toilets and there was a man in there, would you prefer another female person to try to remove that man just in case you happened to have to wash your knickers out?

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:50

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 16:48

If you were in the female toilets and there was a man in there, would you prefer another female person to try to remove that man just in case you happened to have to wash your knickers out?

There wasn't a man though was there? That's the issue. Until the two male police officers went in. I don't want police officers in the loos because someone wasn't dressed feminine enough. O particularly don't want black women being harassed by male police in the toilets.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 05/03/2025 16:51

JazzyJelly · 05/03/2025 16:34

Do you object to all men in female facilities, or just police officers? If the former, I have bad news about who the TERF is. If the latter, I assume you're just shit-stirring.

LOVE this 😂🥰

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 16:54

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:23

Where did I consent to that though? Again, please quote me. Do you agree or not with male police officers on the women's toilets policing a woman for not looking womanly enough?
You can take TERF as an insult if you like, bit weird of you though

It is an insult, which is why you chose to use it. You seem to have lost the ability to comprehend what actually happened. The police officers were responding to a call of a male in the female toilets. Would you expect them to stand outside and ask nicely - “please could the man in the toilets come out, we can’t come in because someone might be washing their knickers out”.
You sound ridiculous.

JazzyJelly · 05/03/2025 16:57

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:45

This wasn't an incident - what was the crime that occured (an actual crime please) that justified them attending inside the facilities? You're acting like they were in there saving a life.
I'm objecting to all males in female facilities - why aren't you?

Ooh, TERF!

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 16:58

I wonder, if @Helpmelosemymind found themselves on fire in a single sex space and a male firefighter came in, would Help tell them to fuck off out of there and send in the female firefighter?

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 05/03/2025 16:59

Catiette · 05/03/2025 16:41

😁

My very logical response (so much so that I suspect you know this already) is...

In this particular circumstance, I've no idea - I wasn't there. I can hypothesise, as people have, that this was an attempt to safeguard women against what appeared to be an unknown man, with the additional reassurances of the police call having been logged, and the attending officers greeted and probably escorted by the caller, all of which would provide additional safeguards offsetting any risk presented by the police officers to make it self-evidently worth "inviting them in" to check on an unknown random male entering a private female space (as perceived).

In more general terms, though, "invite" is a bizarre word, and I'd see no logic to it at all. I honestly doubt the police would RSVP to a gilded card. 😁 "Accept the necessity of male officers, if female officers weren't available, to prevent a potentially far greater harm" would be a more "logical" alternative to this.

Unless one were being disingenuous, of course.

Edited

‘I honestly doubt the police would RSVP to a gilded card’ 😂😂

I am enjoying this thread so much, you cannot beat intelligent, informed, articulate women 🥰

CautiousLurker01 · 05/03/2025 16:59

Q- is it ok for male police to enter the women's bathroom based on someone thinking a man had entered, shouldn't they at least send in female officers?

Yes.
They are officers of the law. I believe even in the US they announce their presence and purpose (official business) when entering single sexed spaces.
Where there is a suspicion of a crime taking place OF COURSE which ever police officers are present should go in. What would you expect us to say - that no, if someone is being murdered, mugged or raped in a single sex space then noone can intervene in an official capacity unless they are same sexed? JFC.

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:59

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 16:54

It is an insult, which is why you chose to use it. You seem to have lost the ability to comprehend what actually happened. The police officers were responding to a call of a male in the female toilets. Would you expect them to stand outside and ask nicely - “please could the man in the toilets come out, we can’t come in because someone might be washing their knickers out”.
You sound ridiculous.

What's insulting about it?

Exactly so the police weren't actually responding to a crime were they ? So where was the justification to harass a black woman in the toilets and how do we prevent this happening?
You and PP sound ridiculous that you can't answer the logic of either there needs to be female officers on attendance if they're going to access female spaces without a legitimate reason or how we allow GNC women to use the toilet without everyone policing their femininity.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 05/03/2025 17:01

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 16:58

I wonder, if @Helpmelosemymind found themselves on fire in a single sex space and a male firefighter came in, would Help tell them to fuck off out of there and send in the female firefighter?

😂😂

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 17:02

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 16:50

There wasn't a man though was there? That's the issue. Until the two male police officers went in. I don't want police officers in the loos because someone wasn't dressed feminine enough. O particularly don't want black women being harassed by male police in the toilets.

Do you actually know how policing works? If someone dials 999 and says that there’s a person in their house brandishing a gun, do you think the police would just pop along, knock politely on the door and ask nicely that if there’s a gunman could they please come out?

LionME · 05/03/2025 17:02

TheUnusuallyQuerulentMxLauraBrown · 05/03/2025 10:55

Hi Chris!

Better that a lesbian be slightly inconvenienced once than all women lose their female only single sex spaces to colonising men-with-gender.

HTH.

oh that’s nice. So much compassion for fellow women isn’t it. Better not look masculine anymore. Never mind the whole feminist take that you should look however you want.

Now what will you do when a transman decide to use the women’s toilet. A transman with full in beard, muscles etc….

Because they ought to be able use the women's right?

WandaSiri · 05/03/2025 17:02

No males in women's public toilets. Here in the UK, we don't mind small boys up to 8 years old, or male cleaners, provided we have been warned.

Assuming this actually happened....
The police were called to remove a man from the single sex toilets at this establishment. Male officers were sent, I would hazard a guess, because it was a man, and men are stronger than women.

The police arrived, confronted the "man" and found she was just a butch woman. Embarrassing and infuriating for the woman, but no real harm done.
The blackness is irrelevant. Her being a lesbian is irrelevant. The reason the police were called was because this woman was thought to be a man.

End of story.

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 17:04

LionME · 05/03/2025 17:02

oh that’s nice. So much compassion for fellow women isn’t it. Better not look masculine anymore. Never mind the whole feminist take that you should look however you want.

Now what will you do when a transman decide to use the women’s toilet. A transman with full in beard, muscles etc….

Because they ought to be able use the women's right?

Yes. They’re female so they can use female spaces. What would you expect to happen?
However, I doubt very much that such a situation would occur because a female who goes to such lengths of conforming to perceived standards of maleness would be unlikely to then go into a public female space as that would instantly mean they’d misgendered themselves. Which would be literal murder.

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 17:07

CautiousLurker01 · 05/03/2025 16:59

Q- is it ok for male police to enter the women's bathroom based on someone thinking a man had entered, shouldn't they at least send in female officers?

Yes.
They are officers of the law. I believe even in the US they announce their presence and purpose (official business) when entering single sexed spaces.
Where there is a suspicion of a crime taking place OF COURSE which ever police officers are present should go in. What would you expect us to say - that no, if someone is being murdered, mugged or raped in a single sex space then noone can intervene in an official capacity unless they are same sexed? JFC.

You don't need to be hyperbolic KFC - where did I say that? But this wasn't an instance of someone being murdered or raped as I replied to PP - this wasn't them attending to an actual report of a crime - so why are you okay with male police officers in single sexed spaces?

Helpmelosemymind · 05/03/2025 17:08

Soontobe60 · 05/03/2025 17:04

Yes. They’re female so they can use female spaces. What would you expect to happen?
However, I doubt very much that such a situation would occur because a female who goes to such lengths of conforming to perceived standards of maleness would be unlikely to then go into a public female space as that would instantly mean they’d misgendered themselves. Which would be literal murder.

Edited

Presumably you support the police being called to establish they are indeed a trans man

Joystir59 · 05/03/2025 17:08

Speaking as a lesbian this experience would have made me feel extremely shit

Brefugee · 05/03/2025 17:09

LionME · 05/03/2025 17:02

oh that’s nice. So much compassion for fellow women isn’t it. Better not look masculine anymore. Never mind the whole feminist take that you should look however you want.

Now what will you do when a transman decide to use the women’s toilet. A transman with full in beard, muscles etc….

Because they ought to be able use the women's right?

many posters here, me included, have consistently said we are not about keeping women out of women's spaces, and that includes transmen.

Having said that. If Buck Angel waltzed into a women's toilet that i was using for sure i would ask if they were sure they were in the right place. Buck Angel, from what I've seen, would say something like "sure, I'm a biological woman". I have no issue with that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.