Having caught up with the day's events, I have a number of thoughts.
1)The perception of Dr Upton thinking he is the cleverest person in the room. Well yes, it's reckoned to be a common problem for doctors on the stand. If you spend your childhood as the cleverest person in every class, and then only meet other people like that when you got to medical school, and then go to work in a non-research clinical environment where the doctors are often the most academic in the room, it is easy (especially if you're an arrogant arsehole) to assume that you are always the brightest person in the room. But the court is not our room, it is the room of lawyers. And they probably had just the same experience until they hit university, too...
2)I had been rather presuming that the main fault lay with NHS Fife, for their (by the sounds of it) ludicrously misogynistic policies and the usually incompetent NHS HR process. Having read the accounts of Dr Upton on the stand, however, he has convinced me that it was in fact likely that he did know he was intimidating and scaring SP, but he merrily cracked on. Which I find disturbing.
3)I am deeply concerned if a practicing doctor really does not know the difference between biologically male and female. Because it is an essential distinction to make in so many clinical scenarios. But I am equally concerned if he does know the difference and denied it on oath, because that sounds like it could be a probity issue.
4)There are threads discussing this case on a doctors' forum I frequent. Quite a few people seem to be having their eyes opened. The more light...