Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #10

1000 replies

nauticant · 10/02/2025 15:51

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and is expected to continue for 2 weeks. The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton started giving evidence on Thursday 6 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely can be obtained by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse
Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2
Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3
Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4
Thread 5: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5
Thread 6: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269635-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-6
Thread 7: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5270365-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-7
Thread 8: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271511-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-8
Thread 9: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271596-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-9

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Bannedontherun · 10/02/2025 20:37

Biglly words i want to do that 😂

ThatsNotMyTeen · 10/02/2025 20:38

oldwomanwhoruns · 10/02/2025 20:27

But whilst we have Gender Reassignment as a Protected Characteristic, he is an Untouchable. The NHS can't do a thing about him, can they?

The issue is not the PC of GR. It is the fact that individuals and institutions have swallowed the stonewall law that having this PC changes someone’s sex

WFTCHTJ · 10/02/2025 20:38

Still catching up, just spat my drink at this bit:
BU - perhpasnothing. My upset may not be avoidable. may be based on prejudice. If a patient sees me and thinks women shouldn't be doctors and goes over my head and speaks to a male doctor, then [sorry having to pause here]

EasternStandard · 10/02/2025 20:39

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 10/02/2025 20:35

Thanks to everyone for the commentary! Here's some relevant bits from 1984, which funnily enough I was thinking about after reading Friday's threads and especially Dr U's contributions. Sometimes men are men, sometimes men are women, sometimes they are both at once. It is not easy to become sane.

'How many fingers, Winston?' 'Four! Stop it, stop it! How can you go on? Four! Four!' 'How many fingers, Winston?' 'Five! Five! Five!' 'No, Winston, that is no use. You are lying. You still think there are four. How many fingers, please?' 'Four! five! Four! Anything you like. Only stop it, stop the pain!' (.....) 'You are a slow learner, Winston,' said O'Brien gently. 'How can I help it?' he blubbered. 'How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.' 'Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.' (.....) O'Brien smiled slightly. 'You are a flaw in the pattern, Winston. .... It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be.

1984, George Orwell. gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100021.txt

So sad

And then adults tell children the equivalent of this

WearyAuldWumman · 10/02/2025 20:40

WFTCHTJ · 10/02/2025 20:38

Still catching up, just spat my drink at this bit:
BU - perhpasnothing. My upset may not be avoidable. may be based on prejudice. If a patient sees me and thinks women shouldn't be doctors and goes over my head and speaks to a male doctor, then [sorry having to pause here]

At best, he's delusional.

eulittleb831 · 10/02/2025 20:40

WhatterySquash · 10/02/2025 20:09

what if he’d sat there and said he was a wombat or a table or a small village in Shropshire?? They’re all equally as untrue and yet somehow in the upside down, everyone is meant to nod and say “no obvious man of course you’re a biological woman”

Small village in shropshire Grin it's only a matter of time...

Thing is he can't realistically sit there and admit that being trans by definition means he is male, or he gives SP a valid reason to have a problem with him being in her CR. To save face (aside from coming across as utterly deranged of course) he has to go the whole hog with the most extreme and ridiculous TRA take that he IS female and that's why he's sooooooo upset and offended, and of course it can only be that she "harassed" him because he's trans, not had an understandable issue with him being there because he's male.

A small village in Shropshire? I doubt he would call himself Clive…..

ICouldHaveCheckedFirst · 10/02/2025 20:41

ThatsNotMyTeen · 10/02/2025 20:38

The issue is not the PC of GR. It is the fact that individuals and institutions have swallowed the stonewall law that having this PC changes someone’s sex

But has DU achieved Gender Reassignment?
By his own words, he
a) is a biological woman; and
b) does not have a GRC. (Can someone confirm he said this?? I understand it to be the case but am now doubting how I know this. It's all doing my head in!).

UnhappyAndYouKnowIt · 10/02/2025 20:42

I just feel sick at what Sandy's been through. She asked for help and tried to sort things out, and then ends up with an email slagging her off in the workplace, gets suspended and can't speak to Co-workers for months. It's horrific.

borntobequiet · 10/02/2025 20:43

WFTCHTJ · 10/02/2025 20:38

Still catching up, just spat my drink at this bit:
BU - perhpasnothing. My upset may not be avoidable. may be based on prejudice. If a patient sees me and thinks women shouldn't be doctors and goes over my head and speaks to a male doctor, then [sorry having to pause here]

That was so bloody weird I became convinced the whole performance was a monster piss take for a moment. I’m still not sure.

Hoardasurass · 10/02/2025 20:44

PaintDecisions · 10/02/2025 16:44

The comments on that article are about 2/3 how can he be a dr/he needs struck off and 1/3 men and women reaching the top of mount kilimanjaro it's quite a sight

Cerah · 10/02/2025 20:44

Place marking. Truly astounding stuff today. Looking forward to tomorrow!

nolongersurprised · 10/02/2025 20:46

Bannedontherun · 10/02/2025 20:07

NC drew out that DU was motivated by his beliefs not his own safety and well being.

NC allowed DU to give a true portrayal of himself, not the shrinking wet lettuce he described earlier to JR and in his complaint. But a self confident arrogant person whose beliefs were firm and unfaltering.

He admitted that he knew SP felt very uncomfortable.

Which means he did by his own admission know he harassed her.

The Court could also conclude that the Christmas incident was harassment by SP, (quite possibly an harassment by DU at the same time.)

But that conclusion would not cancel out the first to incidents of harassment by DU.

It is just all smoke and mirrors on DU part.

He thought the usual TRA tactic was clever, but he actually exposed who he really is and what he is about.

And contained within his smug presentation of his beliefs was an admission of his actual harassment.

I’ve just caught up with the threads and I think NC has done very well. It’s not like TV trials where there’s a gotcha and a confession.

She has exposed DU as a dangerous, deluded narcissist, lacking in empathy who was insistent on getting his own way. And how there was nothing Peggie could have done or said to him that he would have listened to or respected.

Brainworm · 10/02/2025 20:47

By his own words, he a) is a biological woman; and b) does not have a GRC. (Can someone confirm he said this?? I understand it to be the case but am now doubting how I know this. It's all doing my head in!).

I think he side stepped the question and said that whether he had surgery or a GRC would make no difference to his status as a woman. His position was that people have deep knowledge of what sex they are and it is this that makes them a man or woman.

ConstructionTime · 10/02/2025 20:50

The government doesn't even see how this will impact public trust and general order on the streets when the next pandemic or something similar comes around.

Covid
Government: We should trust in scientists and doctors to identify this virus and develop an appropriate vaccine with the least possible side effects (agree)
Flat-Earthers: Vaccines are made by Russian aliens who want to inject us with transponders to read our thoughts
(which is not that far from what Elon Musk is trying with Neuralink, only he sells it as "We're the Good Guys" as this could have some beneficial results for certain conditions, but I doubt it's the final goal)

GC / Material reality
The public: We need to make decisions based on scientific reality
The government: We are probably all Llamas.

rebmacesrevda · 10/02/2025 20:50

This case has been eye-opening for me, and I think for many other people following it. Upton wants to be a civil rights activist, but I wonder whether they have unwittingly awakened a new audience to the gender critical movement. I think I might have become a TERF today, and it's all thanks to Upton.

ArabellaScott · 10/02/2025 20:51

borntobequiet · 10/02/2025 20:43

That was so bloody weird I became convinced the whole performance was a monster piss take for a moment. I’m still not sure.

I think it was, really. He knows we know that no patient would think he was a woman. It's a taunt.

Signalbox · 10/02/2025 20:52

rebmacesrevda · 10/02/2025 20:50

This case has been eye-opening for me, and I think for many other people following it. Upton wants to be a civil rights activist, but I wonder whether they have unwittingly awakened a new audience to the gender critical movement. I think I might have become a TERF today, and it's all thanks to Upton.

Welcome to TERFdom.

WhatterySquash · 10/02/2025 20:53

But whilst we have Gender Reassignment as a Protected Characteristic, he is an Untouchable. The NHS can't do a thing about him, can they?

There must be some degree of unfitness to practise that would get even a TW kicked out. What if he announced he doesn't think a particular ethnic group deserve medical care, or that he thinks crystal healing is the best treatment for schizophrenia, or that women's wombs wander around inside their bodies causing medical issues? Surely his fitness to be a doctor would be questioned and I think saying you don't believe sex is definable and is a nebulous dogwhistle falls into a similar category.

Bagpussnotbothered · 10/02/2025 20:54

Dr Upton is not doing his future career any favours. Aside from the question of patient consent and fitness to practice, what hospital will take a chance on hiring him in the future?

NotAGentleReminder · 10/02/2025 20:55

I'm just catching up on the Telegraph article and got to this bit: 'In her evidence, Ms Peggie has admitted raising the case with Dr Upton of Isla Bryson, the transgender rapist who was initially placed in a woman’s jail.'

SP didn't admit she brought up Ilsa Bryson, though, did she? I thought she said she brought up a case of a man in a woman's prison that had been in the news but she didn't know his name or that he was a rapist.

nocoolnamesleft · 10/02/2025 20:56

Having caught up with the day's events, I have a number of thoughts.

1)The perception of Dr Upton thinking he is the cleverest person in the room. Well yes, it's reckoned to be a common problem for doctors on the stand. If you spend your childhood as the cleverest person in every class, and then only meet other people like that when you got to medical school, and then go to work in a non-research clinical environment where the doctors are often the most academic in the room, it is easy (especially if you're an arrogant arsehole) to assume that you are always the brightest person in the room. But the court is not our room, it is the room of lawyers. And they probably had just the same experience until they hit university, too...

2)I had been rather presuming that the main fault lay with NHS Fife, for their (by the sounds of it) ludicrously misogynistic policies and the usually incompetent NHS HR process. Having read the accounts of Dr Upton on the stand, however, he has convinced me that it was in fact likely that he did know he was intimidating and scaring SP, but he merrily cracked on. Which I find disturbing.

3)I am deeply concerned if a practicing doctor really does not know the difference between biologically male and female. Because it is an essential distinction to make in so many clinical scenarios. But I am equally concerned if he does know the difference and denied it on oath, because that sounds like it could be a probity issue.

4)There are threads discussing this case on a doctors' forum I frequent. Quite a few people seem to be having their eyes opened. The more light...

NotAtMyAge · 10/02/2025 20:57

rebmacesrevda · 10/02/2025 19:01

Me too! Never thought I'd be agreeing with the comments under an article in the Torygraph 😅

There are a lot of us about nowadays. I even have a (very cheap) one year digital sub to the Torygraph because it's so good on this issue.

chilling19 · 10/02/2025 20:57

Still catching up. I think there tribunal are going to throw this into the long grass on the basis that the investigation was a joke. Not helping in this instance but we still have the Darlington nurses to go yet. So fat the 'investigations' have been shoddy (see Jo pheonix) and so they are going to have to up their game pronto. But that still won't work, because if proper investigations are carried out, then a tribunal won't be necessary. As I said earlier who are the internal legal teams?

EasternStandard · 10/02/2025 20:57

UnhappyAndYouKnowIt · 10/02/2025 20:42

I just feel sick at what Sandy's been through. She asked for help and tried to sort things out, and then ends up with an email slagging her off in the workplace, gets suspended and can't speak to Co-workers for months. It's horrific.

I feel similarly from today and it's just from hearing the tribunal

The dominance and gaslighting is too awful to hear

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread